rwfromkansas wrote:
Is this saying the cap is weaker than the models expected in OK?
Yes which unlike most events lately would likely help this event be worse. Would help keep storms discrete while also preventing more morning convection.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
rwfromkansas wrote:
Is this saying the cap is weaker than the models expected in OK?
South Texas Storms wrote:rwfromkansas wrote:The flash flood watch is weird for DFW considering it’s a squall line. Most will get under 2 inches, many under an inch.
Agreed. I'm expecting 0.50-1.50" average amounts for DFW. Surprised NWS FWD is calling for widespread 2-3". Seems quite bullish based on the latest data.
Cpv17 wrote:Weird the SPC has DFW in an enhanced risk and y’all are talking like y’all are barely gonna get anything outta it. That doesn’t make much sense.
bubba hotep wrote:Cpv17 wrote:Weird the SPC has DFW in an enhanced risk and y’all are talking like y’all are barely gonna get anything outta it. That doesn’t make much sense.
The ENH is primarily in place because of the high svr potential for any storms that might fire. However, the chance that storms fire appears to be low.
HockeyTx82 wrote:https://m.facebook.com/wfaa.steve.mccauley
In our area, latest RAP objective analysis indicates MLCAPE
greater than 3000 J/kg at this time with some capping remaining.
An aircraft sounding from 11:30 am indicated a deep moist boundary
layer with around 70 J/kg of MLCIN remaining. This may be
sufficient to keep convection at a minimum across North Texas
through the afternoon. Mesoscale domain visible satellite imagery
show a generally unimpressive CU field across the region at this
time. For now, we`ll keep PoPs generally around 20% through the
afternoon.
Cpv17 wrote:Weird the SPC has DFW in an enhanced risk and y’all are talking like y’all are barely gonna get anything outta it. That doesn’t make much sense.
Anti-freeze wrote:HockeyTx82 wrote:https://m.facebook.com/wfaa.steve.mccauley
Can you summarize for those without facebook?
South Texas Storms wrote:rwfromkansas wrote:The flash flood watch is weird for DFW considering it’s a squall line. Most will get under 2 inches, many under an inch.
Agreed. I'm expecting 0.50-1.50" average amounts for DFW. Surprised NWS FWD is calling for widespread 2-3". Seems quite bullish based on the latest data.
Ntxw wrote:For Oklahoma, one hard thing to predict is storm modes. A lot of scattered activity, semi quasi linear can also cause some issues of not fully taking on the potential. Not saying this will happen but it's often one of the toughest to forecast with severe weather. A few discrete cells like what happened yesterday can overperform, while the opposite can happen as well with too much activity.
snownado wrote:Cpv17 wrote:Weird the SPC has DFW in an enhanced risk and y’all are talking like y’all are barely gonna get anything outta it. That doesn’t make much sense.
So in theory, shear & moisture are more than favorable for high-end surface-based storms *IF* the timing were to coincide with favorable surface instability and *IF* there were a trigger mechanism that's defined enough to break through the cap.
But if the trends this season are any sign, DFW's gonna DFW with a fairly underwhelming event.
Not necessarily a bad thing since it means far less damage to property & far fewer lives at risk in such a large population center (as discussed several posts ago), but that's also the reason why expectations are quite low.
Ntxw wrote:For Oklahoma, one hard thing to predict is storm modes. A lot of scattered activity, semi quasi linear can also cause some issues of not fully taking on the potential. Not saying this will happen but it's often one of the toughest to forecast with severe weather. A few discrete cells like what happened yesterday can overperform, while the opposite can happen as well with too much activity.
ElectricStorm wrote:Ntxw wrote:For Oklahoma, one hard thing to predict is storm modes. A lot of scattered activity, semi quasi linear can also cause some issues of not fully taking on the potential. Not saying this will happen but it's often one of the toughest to forecast with severe weather. A few discrete cells like what happened yesterday can overperform, while the opposite can happen as well with too much activity.
I think that's probably why they haven't pulled the trigger on a high risk yet but the HRRR seems to be trending towards a more discrete/semi-discrete mode so we'll see
cheezyWXguy wrote:snownado wrote:Cpv17 wrote:Weird the SPC has DFW in an enhanced risk and y’all are talking like y’all are barely gonna get anything outta it. That doesn’t make much sense.
So in theory, shear & moisture are more than favorable for high-end surface-based storms *IF* the timing were to coincide with favorable surface instability and *IF* there were a trigger mechanism that's defined enough to break through the cap.
But if the trends this season are any sign, DFW's gonna DFW with a fairly underwhelming event.
Not necessarily a bad thing since it means far less damage to property & far fewer lives at risk in such a large population center (as discussed several posts ago), but that's also the reason why expectations are quite low.
Yeah with today’s potential, I don’t mind sitting this one out. I do think tonight’s squall line has some chance to be fairly potent though. 4-5am arrival isn’t exactly ideal timing, but the depicted environment is rather impressive for that time, with sufficient instability, minimal capping and high SRH values. Spinups would definitely be possible if the line holds together til then.
One thing nagging at me right now though is that there are storms out in west Texas that the CAMs are struggling to depict. I wonder if this is any indication that the cap may be more breakable south of the red river than expected. Probably doesn’t mean much but just a thought.
Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], wxman22 and 55 guests