ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8921 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:05 am

Short term trend west had a large shift in the landfall on the SE coast. It will be like that till it makes landfall somewhere. I am breathing a little easier here in Wilmington, NC. I will pray for you guys in Florida. I know the way the models are trending west is not looking good for ya'll. :cry:
2 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8922 Postby Sanibel » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:05 am

I would call this slightly offshore and a locking of the track over almost 2 days now...
0 likes   

MatthewsRevenge

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8923 Postby MatthewsRevenge » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:06 am

Wow, GFS has this hitting landfall in Savannah, GA.
Last edited by MatthewsRevenge on Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8924 Postby Raebie » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:06 am

Savannah is in a world of trouble. No matter the model, it looks like landfall in that area is becoming more and more inevitable.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8925 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:06 am

Yeah, GFS is still probably too far east. It's got Irma near to coming in along the GA Coast at 96 hours (which is valid Monday at 7am). It's probably a little too deep and a little too far east still though the 2nd landfall point makes sense in its run and will probably be at least close.
1 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8926 Postby NDG » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:06 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8927 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:09 am

The GFS has the center of the eye 25-30 miles offshore, I ran the coordinates. The western eyewall rakes much of the coast. One more 25 mile shift brings the eye onshore. Interested to see the ECM, and the ENS.
3 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8928 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:11 am

GFS is slower with Irma to the point the 588dm ridge break occurs so further east turn, ECM is about 6 hours later.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8929 Postby gatorcane » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:12 am

CMC shifts a little west:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8930 Postby gatorcane » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:14 am

CMC shifts west:

Image
2 likes   

User avatar
Jevo
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1729
Age: 47
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: The Flemish Cap
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8931 Postby Jevo » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:14 am

The only saving grace for GA at this point is most models have the storm at a borderline Cat 1/2.. Couldn't image a 4 pushing water up into that area. Irregardless depending on which model you look at, FL still has to deal with Irma as a Cat 4. The GFS is coming East this run by about 20 miles on approach and if it's ensembles are any measure we may see that encroach upon the FL East coast with later runs.
0 likes   
Disclaimer: 50% of the time I have no clue of what I am talking about. Chances are I am taking a less than educated guess that sounds good because 10 years ago I stole Mike Watkins book 'The Hurricane and its Impact'. For official information please direct yourself to the NHC and their cadre of weather geniuses.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8932 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:14 am

12Z Canadian is out to 60 hours, and it has Irma a little SW of the 00Z run.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=186

Lanfdall Miami at about 70 hours (which would be Sunday morning at 5:00am).
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=317

Definite swing West for the CMC which had been just east of the peninsula at 00Z.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8933 Postby ronjon » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:15 am

Steve wrote:Yeah, GFS is still probably too far east. It's got Irma near to coming in along the GA Coast at 96 hours (which is valid Monday at 7am). It's probably a little too deep and a little too far east still though the 2nd landfall point makes sense in its run and will probably be at least close.


I agree - at this point based on the westward shifts of the NAM (synoptic use only), the 12z GFS and GEM, the relative consistency of the last two NAVGEM runs on the SW Fl coast, the EC ensembles, and the operational Euro verifying better with the actual storms movement (more southerly), I believe any future adjustments on track might be slightly westward. The GFS solution is still possible and these forecast turns with troughs can sometimes be difficult for models to grasp but I'm not seeing alot of evidence of that from other guidance so far.
Last edited by ronjon on Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8934 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:15 am

Jevo wrote:The only saving grace for GA at this point is most models have the storm at a borderline Cat 1/2.. Couldn't image a 4 pushing water up into that area. Irregardless depending on which model you look at, FL still has to deal with Irma as a Cat 4. The GFS is coming East this run by about 20 miles on approach and if it's ensembles are any measure we may see that encroach upon the FL East coast with later runs.

Jevo, the GFS has it as a 4 into GA...and even the NHC has it as a 3 on approach.
2 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

Pughetime12
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:07 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8935 Postby Pughetime12 » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:16 am

Steve wrote:Yeah, GFS is still probably too far east. It's got Irma near to coming in along the GA Coast at 96 hours (which is valid Monday at 7am). It's probably a little too deep and a little too far east still though the 2nd landfall point makes sense in its run and will probably be at least close.


If it comes in more west, wouldn't it come in further down in Georgia? With it getting pushed NW once it's in Georgia, I'm wondering if that would lessen some of the wind speeds in the coastal areas of GA/SC.
Last edited by Pughetime12 on Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Zarniwoop
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:02 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8936 Postby Zarniwoop » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:16 am

Honest question from someone who is ignorant.

Does anyone take the GFS intensity forecast seriously? I mean anyone that matters.

Because, they always seem outrageously low compared to other models. And I'm probably imagining this, but they always seem to be east of most other models in my limited experience of watching.

Just a beginner question.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8937 Postby gatorcane » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:18 am

Anybody have text UKMET?
1 likes   

Craters
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 421
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:34 pm
Location: Alvin, TX (south of Houston)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8938 Postby Craters » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:18 am

The NHC has their storm-surge maps up for Irma in the graphics section.

Direct link to the model's inundation map:

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphic ... n#contents
1 likes   
Nothing that I post here should ever be treated as a forecast or anything resembling one. Please check with your local NWS office or the NHC for forecasts, watches, and warnings.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8939 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:18 am

Looks like being within 72 hours of S/SE FL Landfall, the tracks are really starting to come together. GFS is near shore. CMC is on shore. And they haven't been the best with Irma (CMC slightly better to 72 hours last I looked). Next to run are the lesser models NAVGEM and JMA and the mesoscale models HMON and HWRF. If they are all clustered at or near the S/SE Tip of FL in 68-72 hours, I think we can raise the hurricane flags in Miami.

Of course EC is still an hour and a half out and could throw a monkey wrench into this since it's the best model.
2 likes   

norva
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:41 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8940 Postby norva » Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:19 am

Do you think the NHC cone at 5 will shift West because of these runs or stay the same?
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests