ATL: IKE Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re:
HouTXmetro wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t4/loop-ft.html
WSW jog?
Don't get me excited.....it's just a wobble right?
http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/satelli ... duration=9
Last edited by Stormcenter on Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
Jijenji wrote:Ok, let me remind everyone again that I'm an amateur. But that being said, it sure looks to me on the water vapor loops that the center of the storm is much further north?
Boy sure feels that way, should have seen the rain and the wind that just went through upper Plaquemines Parish. The rain/wind band lasted about 10 minutes and I'm sure gusted to 60mph. Crazy! Tonite is going to be rough.
0 likes
Re:
seems unlikely to dodge that big of a bullet at this point...landfall further west than rita
weather offices inland are on top of the potential inland effects. From NWS Shreveport
TROPICAL STORM WIND WATCH IS IN EFFECT FOR PART OF NORTHEAST
TEXAS...MILLER COUNTY IN SOUTWEST ARKANSAS...AND NORTHWEST
LOUISIANA...SOUTHWEST OF A LINE FROM CLARKSVILLE TEXAS...TO
TEXARKANA ARKANSAS...TO NATCHITOCHES LOUISIANA.
weather offices inland are on top of the potential inland effects. From NWS Shreveport
TROPICAL STORM WIND WATCH IS IN EFFECT FOR PART OF NORTHEAST
TEXAS...MILLER COUNTY IN SOUTWEST ARKANSAS...AND NORTHWEST
LOUISIANA...SOUTHWEST OF A LINE FROM CLARKSVILLE TEXAS...TO
TEXARKANA ARKANSAS...TO NATCHITOCHES LOUISIANA.
fasterdisaster wrote:Even if it were to make landfall east of Galveston it would have to be more than 30 miles away for them to avoid hurricane winds.
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
Gustav made landfall close to daylight (I dont remember if it was before or after). Baton Rouge got the worst of it during the afternoon.hiflyer wrote:After 25 years down in SoFla I have one question...why do most of these storms do their US landfall at night? Is it written in code somewhere? I've done a few of these and I would far prefer a day passage over a night transit...but the NHC says 0100 on the coast....
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:21 am
- Location: Wayne, NJ
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
I would really like to see Ike's historical track, from his birth til now, in satellite photos. Does anyone have that?
0 likes
Re:
MiamiensisWx wrote:One small consolation for Galveston Bay:
If Ike makes landfall directly on Galveston and the mouth of the bay, the large wind radii and RMW would imply that the greatest surge values would occur farther east (closer to High Island). Of course, this is contingent on the landfall location and RMW size. If the RMW shrinks (while the wind radii remains as large as the current situation), Galveston Bay would experience the largest surge values. This will be VERY important...
Houston/Galveston area members, PAY attention to this point... do not be complacent in the future if Ike's greatest surge occurs farther east.
0 likes
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
Re:
KWT wrote:Stormcenter, it probably is, recon does show that its moved more or less westward since the lass pass but that probably means very little and will no doubt get corrected down the road.
Yeah, it more than likely will correct itself and when it does we are all going to swear it's made the north turn. But per both satellites and recon it did do a big jog west and possibly WSW.
Last edited by HouTXmetro on Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re:
wilma and bulk of katrina were day events...as evidenced by the amount of video clips people have posted from both on youtube etc
hiflyer wrote:After 25 years down in SoFla I have one question...why do most of these storms do their US landfall at night? Is it written in code somewhere? I've done a few of these and I would far prefer a day passage over a night transit...but the NHC says 0100 on the coast....
0 likes
Re: Re:
MiamiensisWx wrote:MiamiensisWx wrote:One small consolation for Galveston Bay:
If Ike makes landfall directly on Galveston and the mouth of the bay, the large wind radii and RMW would imply that the greatest surge values would occur farther east (closer to High Island). Of course, this is contingent on the landfall location and RMW size. If the RMW shrinks (while the wind radii remains as large as the current situation), Galveston Bay would experience the largest surge values. This will be VERY important...
Houston/Galveston area members, PAY attention to this point... do not be complacent in the future if Ike's greatest surge occurs farther east.
VEry good point, though I suspect in this case either way the Galveston Sewall is going to gt over topped to some extent, its just a matter of how badly I reckon at the moment.
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
not sataellite images...but nhc graphical display really shows the wind field blossoming in the loop..
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/graphics/al09/loop_R.shtml
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/graphics/al09/loop_R.shtml
luvcanescarol wrote:I would really like to see Ike's historical track, from his birth til now, in satellite photos. Does anyone have that?
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:21 am
- Location: Wayne, NJ
-
- Tropical Wave
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:35 am
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
luvcanescarol wrote:I would really like to see Ike's historical track, from his birth til now, in satellite photos. Does anyone have that?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26295161/
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
it is a great review of where we have been so far with ike too....and the graphics the nhc use give it almost 'cartoonish' quality which is ironic since we are tracking a beast!
luvcanescarol wrote:That's really interesting. Thank you for posting it!
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:22 am
- Location: Lives in Melbourne, works in N Queensland
Re: Re:
rtd2 wrote:NHC on target again 4-5 days out...kudos again they need to start 7 day forecast on future storms
4 days out they had landfall at 27.5N 97.0W, rtd2.
They now have it at 29.0N 95.0W
There has been a consistent underestimation of the northern movement by about .5º in just about every 12 hour forecast. That is why the track keeps shifting north.
Not bad, but if you add a couple of extra days the difference gets pretty substantial.
Cheers
Rod
Last edited by Rod Hagen on Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 157 guests