The only official CI8.0 system on record

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Meow

The only official CI8.0 system on record

#1 Postby Meow » Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:53 am

From the Annual Report on the Activities of the RSMC Tokyo - Typhoon Center 2010.

Image

Try to explain this.
Shì shì shì shì.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#2 Postby Alyono » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:09 am

To be fair, I don't think they are using the actual Dvorak scale, but instead a modified version. The intensities do NOT match the actual Dvorak numbers
0 likes   

Meow

Re:

#3 Postby Meow » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:13 am

Alyono wrote:To be fair, I don't think they are using the actual Dvorak scale, but instead a modified version. The intensities do NOT match the actual Dvorak numbers


It is called the Koba table, which JMA uses. CI8.0 = 888hPa 122kt

http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/tcp/d ... alysis.pdf

To many other storms in the northwest Pacific, it works pretty well, but Megi is a disputable case.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#4 Postby Alyono » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:17 am

which means it is not a true Dvorak

That said, Megi was the best looking storm on sat that I have ever seen
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#5 Postby Alyono » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:18 am

The JMA winds in Megi are at least 25 KT too low based upon recon data (even when considering 1 min to 10 min winds). It simply is not accurate
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re:

#6 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:28 am

Alyono wrote:The JMA winds in Megi are at least 25 KT too low based upon recon data (even when considering 1 min to 10 min winds). It simply is not accurate

JMA's wind speed evaluation doesn't follow the traditional sustained wind conversion
125knot is actually the highest wind JMA given to a tropical cyclone since Bess of 1982
Last edited by supercane4867 on Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Meow

Re:

#7 Postby Meow » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:28 am

Alyono wrote:The JMA winds in Megi are at least 25 KT too low based upon recon data (even when considering 1 min to 10 min winds). It simply is not accurate

CI8.0 = 122kt = original 170kt

I guess 125kt is the maximum limit of JMA’s scale based on the Koba table. Tip’s 140kt is just converted from 165kt (165*0.88=140.8). Other two 125kt storms from JMA Best Track were born before the Koba table.

Alyono wrote:which means it is not a true Dvorak

Currently no agency uses a true Dvorak.
Last edited by Meow on Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re:

#8 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:34 am

Alyono wrote:That said, Megi was the best looking storm on sat that I have ever seen

Typhoon Nida and Hurricane Rick in the Previous year just look as impressive if not even better
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Re:

#9 Postby Alyono » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:38 am

Meow wrote:
Alyono wrote:The JMA winds in Megi are at least 25 KT too low based upon recon data (even when considering 1 min to 10 min winds). It simply is not accurate

CI8.0 = 122kt = original 170kt

I guess 125kt is the maximum limit of JMA’s scale based on the Koba table. Tip’s 140kt is just converted from 165kt (165*0.88=140.8). Other two 125kt storms from JMA Best Track were born before the Koba table.

Alyono wrote:which means it is not a true Dvorak

Currently no agency uses a true Dvorak.


They should have used the conversion for Megi as like Tip, Megi had recon data
0 likes   

Meow

Re: Re:

#10 Postby Meow » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:40 am

supercane4867 wrote:Typhoon Nida and Hurricane Rick in the Previous year just look as impressive if not even better

Yes, they are extremely impressive, but not the most impressive. Based on their looking, they may be 9.9, but not 10.0.
0 likes   

Meow

Re: Re:

#11 Postby Meow » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:47 am

Alyono wrote:They should have used the conversion for Megi as like Tip, Megi had recon data

The Koba table is not a conversion; it is an average rate of many observations.

Other agencies in the South Hemisphere use the conversion. Strong storms look stronger, but many storms which can be analysed as TS by JMA would not be named because of the conversion.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: Re:

#12 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:52 am

Meow wrote:
supercane4867 wrote:Typhoon Nida and Hurricane Rick in the Previous year just look as impressive if not even better

Yes, they are extremely impressive, but not the most impressive. Based on their looking, they may be 9.9, but not 10.0.


Neither Megi could score a 10.0
From objective Dvorak standard they were all at the same level
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

#13 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:08 pm

What were Monica's Dvorak's? That IMO was as strong as Megi.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re:

#14 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:10 pm

Yellow Evan wrote:What were Monica's Dvorak's? That IMO was as strong as Megi.


That CI8.0 analyze was from CIMSS-ADT, nothing official
0 likes   

Meow

#15 Postby Meow » Fri Aug 23, 2013 2:33 pm

Megi is also very lucky—it has a TIFF MODIS picture for its peak intensity, but Nida and Rick don’t have.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: The only official CI8.0 system on record

#16 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:33 pm

Notice that there're about six tropical cyclones globally had the maximum Dvorak T-number given by an agency
As one of them Hurricane Gilbert was analyzed at T8.0 by NHC itself. So Megi maybe the only Official CI8.0 system, but not the only system received official top Dvorak intensity.
0 likes   

Meow

Re: The only official CI8.0 system on record

#17 Postby Meow » Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:59 pm

supercane4867 wrote:Notice that there're about six tropical cyclones globally had the maximum Dvorak T-number given by an agency
As one of them Hurricane Gilbert was analyzed at T8.0 by NHC itself. So Megi maybe the only Official CI8.0 system, but not the only system received official top Dvorak intensity.

Please give us a reference.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: The only official CI8.0 system on record

#18 Postby supercane4867 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:34 pm

Meow wrote:Please give us a reference.

If this is what you want

Hurricane Gilbert preliminary report page 8
Image

Squares that went off the chart correspond to 170kt intensity
0 likes   

Meow

Re: The only official CI8.0 system on record

#19 Postby Meow » Sat Aug 24, 2013 7:06 am

supercane4867 wrote:Squares that went off the chart correspond to 170kt intensity

But it is not ultimately recognized. :(
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: The only official CI8.0 system on record

#20 Postby supercane4867 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 12:43 pm

Meow wrote:
supercane4867 wrote:Squares that went off the chart correspond to 170kt intensity

But it is not ultimately recognized. :(


Of course not, it's Dvorak classification and does not related to what recon found anyway
Just an example of another perfect storm by official satellite estimation
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests