Accuweather Wrong With Larry's Path

lilbump3000 · #1 Postby **lilbump3000** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:52 pm

Accuweather is very wrong on were larry is going to be in 5 days, they are even wrong within 3 days

click below to see how wrong they are
http://hurricane.accuweather.com/adcbin ... e&partner=

lilbump3000 · #2 Postby **lilbump3000** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:52 pm

I don't think he going to move that fast.

#3 Postby **Lowpressure** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:55 pm

That track is pretty hard to believe, but the way this season has gone, who knows?

#4 Postby **feederband** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:00 pm

this is almost what steve lyons was suggesting :?

lilbump3000 · #5 Postby **lilbump3000** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:01 pm

Well only time will tell to see if they right.

#6 Postby **Steve** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:04 pm

Funny how their best tropical met, Joe Bastardi, is putting out something entirely different. He called for formation and a hit in his landfall zone 3 (Boothville to Apalachacola) back on Monday or Tuesday when most were screaming frontal low and whatever. He maintains his previous position tonight. Give Joe some credit for nailing the BOC/Gulf from early last week as the place to look given the overall pattern.

He needs to just ditch Accuweather and go private. They're like the rest of the generic sources.

Steve

WoodstockWX · #7 Postby **WoodstockWX** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:12 pm

They're afraid to put a circle as a projected path like NHC practically did.

PTrackerLA · #8 Postby **PTrackerLA** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:32 pm

I bet most of the mets along the gulf coast tonight are basically throwing their hands up in the air with a confused face :lol:

wrkh99 · #9 Postby **wrkh99** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:34 pm

Pt They probley still don't know that we have has new TS

Lindaloo · #10 Postby **Lindaloo** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:46 pm

Well tonight my local station (WLOX) is running a ticker across the top of the screen. I do not understand that at all.

#11 Postby **wxman57** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:10 pm

It's interesting that the official AccuWeather track is opposite from what JB was saying. Actually, I like that track, though I think it is probably too slow. The track isn't too far off from the GFDL, and close to the UKMET. The GFDL may not be too bad, moving Larry inland in about 72 hrs.

Rainband · #12 Postby **Rainband** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:13 pm

wxman57 wrote:It's interesting that the official AccuWeather track is opposite from what JB was saying. Actually, I like that track, though I think it is probably too slow. The track isn't too far off from the GFDL, and close to the UKMET. The GFDL may not be too bad, moving Larry inland in about 72 hrs.

I think this system caught everyone by surprise. It just proves mother nature throws curve balls.. :roll:

bahamaswx · #13 Postby **bahamaswx** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:14 pm

How is it wrong? While I'm in the EAST bandwagon, you can't really rule out a Mexican landfall.. not by a longshot.

Rainband · #14 Postby **Rainband** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:17 pm

bahamaswx wrote:How is it wrong? While I'm in the EAST bandwagon, you can't really rule out a Mexican landfall.. not by a longshot.

I don't mean the track..the formation is what I mean. Most everybody was saying no Larry... :roll:

bahamaswx · #15 Postby **bahamaswx** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:22 pm

And I didn't mean you

... the guy named the thread "Accuweather WRONG with Larry's path"

Accuweather Wrong With Larry's Path

Accuweather Wrong With Larry's Path

hmm

Who is online