Accu-Weather Joe B forecast for 2005

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

Accu-Weather Joe B forecast for 2005

#1 Postby KatDaddy » Wed May 18, 2005 10:37 am

Here you go

Image
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Brett Adair
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 322
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Sylacauga, Alabama
Contact:

Re: Accu-Weather Joe B forecast for 2005

#2 Postby Brett Adair » Wed May 18, 2005 10:39 am

KatDaddy wrote:Here you go

Image


Ugh....I hate AccuWeather at this time. And that forecast from JB, totally ridiculous. He is a pro, and has done much better in the past on his tropical predictions. I would be willing to bet that the Hatteras area is the region to watch this year. Someone along the Mid Atlantic gets slammed....
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

#3 Postby KatDaddy » Wed May 18, 2005 10:42 am

Yes I agree Brett. I would like to read his forecast in detail but I refuse to pay Accu-weather any money :)
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Brett Adair
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 322
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Sylacauga, Alabama
Contact:

#4 Postby Brett Adair » Wed May 18, 2005 10:43 am

KatDaddy wrote:Yes I agree Brett. I would like to read his forecast in detail but I refuse to pay Accu-weather any money :)


The BOYCOTT is on KatDaddy! I think myself and the members of the stormtracker forum (professional/ameatur storm chasers board) are all in protest.
0 likes   

cyclonaut

#5 Postby cyclonaut » Wed May 18, 2005 10:46 am

It doesnt get anymore vague than that folks!
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

#6 Postby Agua » Wed May 18, 2005 10:47 am

His region specific forecast won't be published until June.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#7 Postby dhweather » Wed May 18, 2005 10:48 am

I'm certainly not paying accuweather or anyone else for services
that my tax dollars provide.

Does accuweather have its own satellites in orbit for tracking tropical
systems? NO

Has accuweather deployed WSR88D nationally for its own use? NO

Has accuweather collected ocean and atmospheric data for decades
to use in its forecasts? NO

Does accuweather have the authority to issuse severe weather watches
and warnings? NO

Their place is to act as a consultant for industry or add value to what NOAA does already.

NOAA is responsible for all of the above and uses our tax dollars to do so.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#8 Postby dhweather » Wed May 18, 2005 10:49 am

Whoops, after my diatribe, I forgot to say that yes, it's a safe and true
call to say that from Brownsville to Cape Hatteras is at a higher risk.
Most kids in school know that too.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurryKane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Diamondhead, Mississippi

#9 Postby HurryKane » Wed May 18, 2005 10:52 am

dhweather wrote:Whoops, after my diatribe, I forgot to say that yes, it's a safe and true
call to say that from Brownsville to Cape Hatteras is at a higher risk.
Most kids in school know that too.


Pootus could have predicted that.

Why did he release the "greatest risk" part? Why not just leave it at the storm number predictions--did he think that a pretty graphic behind them would make it look more informative, when in reality it's quite vague?
Last edited by HurryKane on Wed May 18, 2005 10:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Brett Adair
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 322
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Sylacauga, Alabama
Contact:

#10 Postby Brett Adair » Wed May 18, 2005 10:52 am

dhweather wrote:I'm certainly not paying accuweather or anyone else for services
that my tax dollars provide.

Does accuweather have its own satellites in orbit for tracking tropical
systems? NO

Has accuweather deployed WSR88D nationally for its own use? NO

Has accuweather collected ocean and atmospheric data for decades
to use in its forecasts? NO

Does accuweather have the authority to issuse severe weather watches
and warnings? NO

Their place is to act as a consultant for industry or add value to what NOAA does already.

NOAA is responsible for all of the above and uses our tax dollars to do so.


Thank you very much for speaking my thoughts dhweather. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Brett Adair
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 322
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Sylacauga, Alabama
Contact:

#11 Postby Brett Adair » Wed May 18, 2005 10:53 am

HurryKane wrote:
dhweather wrote:Whoops, after my diatribe, I forgot to say that yes, it's a safe and true
call to say that from Brownsville to Cape Hatteras is at a higher risk.
Most kids in school know that too.


Pootus could have predicted that.

Why did he release the "greatest risk" part? Why not just leave it at the storm number predictions--did he think that a pretty graphic behind them would make it look more informative, when in reality it's quite vague?


I seriously hope everyone is taking that JPG piece of crap for what it's worth.
0 likes   

User avatar
cajungal
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2336
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Schriever, Louisiana (60 miles southwest of New Orleans)

#12 Postby cajungal » Wed May 18, 2005 10:55 am

DUH! That is where the majority of the hurricanes hit anyway. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
The Big Dog
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 8:30 am
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

#13 Postby The Big Dog » Wed May 18, 2005 10:57 am

My neighbor's 10-year-old daughter could have come up with that. Gee thanks, Joe. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#14 Postby dhweather » Wed May 18, 2005 10:58 am

HurryKane wrote:
dhweather wrote:Whoops, after my diatribe, I forgot to say that yes, it's a safe and true
call to say that from Brownsville to Cape Hatteras is at a higher risk.
Most kids in school know that too.


Pootus could have predicted that.

Why did he release the "greatest risk" part? Why not just leave it at the storm number predictions--did he think that a pretty graphic behind them would make it look more informative, when in reality it's quite vague?


Pootus is a smart one though! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#15 Postby dhweather » Wed May 18, 2005 10:59 am

FYI - Pootus is my 1.5 year old daughter.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurryKane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Diamondhead, Mississippi

#16 Postby HurryKane » Wed May 18, 2005 11:03 am

Check it out! He predicts that there will be 3 Landfalling HuRRRicanes.

BRRRilliant, that.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#17 Postby dhweather » Wed May 18, 2005 11:04 am

They wanted to accenuate the R's

Or their graphic artist has a stuttering typing problem
0 likes   

hcane
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 8:32 pm

Landfall forecast ????

#18 Postby hcane » Wed May 18, 2005 11:21 am

The poor excuse for a forecast is an example of why they need more money .... hire a grpahic artist that can spell and a forecaster that truly makes a forecast not a blanket statement ....
0 likes   

rainstorm

#19 Postby rainstorm » Wed May 18, 2005 11:32 am

its a prelim forecast
0 likes   

User avatar
BayouVenteux
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 775
Age: 64
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:26 pm
Location: Ascension Parish, Louisiana (30.3 N 91.0 W)

Re: Landfall forecast ????

#20 Postby BayouVenteux » Wed May 18, 2005 11:37 am

hcane wrote:The poor excuse for a forecast is an example of why they need more money .... hire a grpahic artist that can spell and a forecaster that truly makes a forecast not a blanket statement ....


As a "grpahic artist" :wink: myself, I can certainly empathize with the aggravation you feel regarding the sordid state of spelling abilities and proofing skills among many in the profession.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chaser1 and 519 guests