Adrian was RIPed after Crossing Central America
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 23703
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Adrian was RIPed after Crossing Central America
Not a chance...mountainous terrain destroyed it...it's dead.....RIP!
0 likes
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
- Brett Adair
- Category 1

- Posts: 322
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:49 pm
- Location: Sylacauga, Alabama
- Contact:
-
HURRICANELONNY
- Category 5

- Posts: 1387
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:48 am
- Location: HOLLYWOOD.FL
MODELS
It was pretty obvious that this little system didn't have a chance but why do some of these models not take into consideration the terrain and shear. Like the GFDL had it as a Hurricane near Bahamas in a couple of days and it was obvious it ain't happening. Where is the information being put into these models and if they can't get the info. why post such dumb things.
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Re: MODELS
HURRICANELONNY wrote:It was pretty obvious that this little system didn't have a chance but why do some of these models not take into consideration the terrain and shear. Like the GFDL had it as a Hurricane near Bahamas in a couple of days and it was obvious it ain't happening. Where is the information being put into these models and if they can't get the info. why post such dumb things.
Some models account for terrain, some don't. Unfortunately, many people forget about terrain at times and focus on the model output too heavily.
Additionally, those models who do account for terrain are only accurate if the track verifies. For example, say this given model forecasts the system to cross over Nicaragua/Costa Rica border. Elevation at this point is roughly 2,300ft. The model will calculate the given frictional effects against 2,300ft terrain and then regenerate the cyclone once over water.
Now, say the track was off and the system made landfall near El Salvador where the elevation is roughly 7,200ft. The difference between the actual frictional effects and the forecast effects are based off of a differential elevation of nearly 5,000ft -- a huge difference. This would greatly affect the speed of decay and the potential/speed of redevelopment.
0 likes
- TropicalWXMA
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 114
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:22 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive

- Posts: 29133
- Age: 74
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
Mike, well stated.
To give a prime example of the differences. If you watch any TC cross Hispaniola-mountains up to 10,000 feet or so-most will be severely decimated if not destroyed by that transit, but if you run the same TC across Eastern Cuba or for that matter Puerto Rico, which also have some "mountains", the effect will be much less due to the fact that the mountains at these locations are hills compared to what is in Hispaniola.
Can any of the pro mets tell us which of the models do take terrrain into account?
To give a prime example of the differences. If you watch any TC cross Hispaniola-mountains up to 10,000 feet or so-most will be severely decimated if not destroyed by that transit, but if you run the same TC across Eastern Cuba or for that matter Puerto Rico, which also have some "mountains", the effect will be much less due to the fact that the mountains at these locations are hills compared to what is in Hispaniola.
Can any of the pro mets tell us which of the models do take terrrain into account?
0 likes
-
Scorpion
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Scorpion wrote:Pretty odd that Jeanne survived Hispaniola and was a minimal hurricane at landfall.
Well, A) it didn't cross Hispaniola, which would have weakened the storm tremendously, but rather a brushing, and B) even after the brushing, the system remained of tropical depression/storm strength for a few days (which is a very long time in the tropical world, especially if you've had the express pleasure of waiting minute by minute for the next recon report or NHC advisory).

0 likes
-
HurricaneBill
- Category 5

- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
Scorpion wrote:Pretty odd that Jeanne survived Hispaniola and was a minimal hurricane at landfall.
Jeanne barely survived Hispaniola. After emerging from Haiti, she was barely a depression and the low level circulation broke away from the mid level circulation.
What saved Jeanne was a new low level circulation forming in the large band of convection east of the center.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: gib, Hammy, HurricaneRyan and 524 guests

