New Old News re: Rick Insanatorm

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

New Old News re: Rick Insanatorm

#1 Postby MWatkins » Fri May 27, 2005 1:40 pm

Gee...must be a slow news day...we've been talking about this stuff since April...about time the AP grabbed it...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050527/ap_ ... um_s_storm

Prepare to get angry...

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#2 Postby yoda » Fri May 27, 2005 1:44 pm

Oh I am... especially by the last sentence by Myers.... :grrr:
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#3 Postby dhweather » Fri May 27, 2005 2:01 pm

"The National Weather Service is not focused on it's core mission of protecting the nation's lives and property," Myers said. "There have been numerous examples in the last year, situations where they have not devoted the resources to that."


Really Rick? Please show me where the NWS has not focused on its
core business? What are the examples? Please elaborate!

I don't care who runs against him, I will send his opponet money in 2006.
People like him are fundamentally wrong, and do not deserve to be
in public office.
0 likes   

User avatar
Skywatch_NC
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

#4 Postby Skywatch_NC » Fri May 27, 2005 2:05 pm

:rarrow: Insanatorum :rarrow: :Door:
Last edited by Skywatch_NC on Fri May 27, 2005 2:44 pm, edited 4 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

#5 Postby Agua » Fri May 27, 2005 2:10 pm

dhweather wrote:"The National Weather Service is not focused on it's core mission of protecting the nation's lives and property," Myers said. "There have been numerous examples in the last year, situations where they have not devoted the resources to that."


I guess they were focusing on pina coladas and beach balls instead. :roll:

On a side note - $2,000 for a campaign contribution really isn't the kind of $ that moves politicians to sponsor bills.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#6 Postby x-y-no » Fri May 27, 2005 2:20 pm

Agua wrote:
dhweather wrote:"The National Weather Service is not focused on it's core mission of protecting the nation's lives and property," Myers said. "There have been numerous examples in the last year, situations where they have not devoted the resources to that."


I guess they were focusing on pina coladas and beach balls instead. :roll:


I'm sure this issue never crossed their radar until concerned folks started screaming about it. I'm less and less impressed with "journalists" as time goes by.

That slam on the Weather Service was totally uncalled for. And Santorum keeps claiming this is just "restoring the old rules that were changed last year." That's a blatant lie. :grr:


On a side note - $2,000 for a campaign contribution really isn't the kind of $ that moves politicians to sponsor bills.


Yes, that's true. However, I'm sure if one added up all the contributions coming from folks more or less associated with Accuweather, it's enough to get Santorum's attention.

Jan
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#7 Postby dhweather » Fri May 27, 2005 2:20 pm

$2k is nothing to them, that's a fact.

Mike - why don't you invite the fine senator onto Talkin Tropics?
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#8 Postby Andrew92 » Fri May 27, 2005 2:21 pm

Next election,

:Door:

Yep, that's the door. Don't let it hit you on the way out!

-Andrew92
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9628
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#9 Postby Steve » Fri May 27, 2005 3:38 pm

>>On a side note - $2,000 for a campaign contribution really isn't the kind of $ that moves politicians to sponsor bills.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it the MAXIMUM allowable individual contribution? And they've donated to him time and time again.

I don't care what anyone's political stripes are - Democrat, Republican or Independent like I am. Just make sure you donate to Bob Casey for Senator. Leave your partisanship at the door while showing it to (in)Santorum.

https://secure.ga3.org/01/contribution

Santorum is an expert fund raiser and will have massive amounts of capital for his 2006 Senate race. In my entire life, I've only ever donated to one candidate - Senator McCain in 2000 before he got savaged by Rove in a desperate attempt to save the Bush candidacy when it was clear that people of all stripes would be willing to support McCain. They said, "oops we're sorry we lied about you" but the damage was done. I never forgave them for that transgression and will never forgive Santorum for coopting the public for his little friends in State College. As promised, they didn't get my monthly contribution of $24.95 so they could turn a portion of it over to Ricky boy.

Oh yeah Steve, tell us how you really feel :)

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

#10 Postby Agua » Fri May 27, 2005 3:50 pm

Steve wrote:>>On a side note - $2,000 for a campaign contribution really isn't the kind of $ that moves politicians to sponsor bills.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it the MAXIMUM allowable individual contribution? And they've donated to him time and time again.


I don't know on the federal level. I know the firm I'm with makes contributions several times that amount to *local* level campaigns, i.e., county, regularly and 1,000 - 5,000 from regular joes on that level isn't uncommon at all. That's why I said 2,000 really isn't the kind of $ to move politicians, and on a national level, frankly, it isn't even a drop in a barrel.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gib and 519 guests