Emily Forecast #8: Will restrengthen but not by much

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Josephine96

Emily Forecast #8: Will restrengthen but not by much

#1 Postby Josephine96 » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:02 pm

EXPERIMENTAL HURRICANE FORECAST
HURRICANE EMILY
NJN WEATHER CENTER
1015 PM MON JULY 18TH 2005

After whipping the living daylights out of Mexico's resort coast as a strong Cat 4.. Emily was knocked down all the way to barely a hurricane. This drop in intensity caught me off guard not thinking she'd shrink that much.

Emily did some reported heavy damage to the areas affected but conflicting reports are still arising. Despite this.. she's not done and headed for a 2nd landfall on Mexican soil, possibly as early as late tomorrow.

Emily is into the BOC now and she will try to regain some strength in the warm waters.. These waters will probably strengthen her, but since she may make landfall again in the next 24-36 hrs.. she won't really have time to bomb out.

Emily's threat to South Texas is starting to subside a little bit. It appears the NHC has their track sticking to the Central Mexican coastline. Thus keeping even rainbands far enough away from South Texas.

Our official forecast is for Emily to become a strong Cat 1 or minimal Cat 2 by 2nd landfall.

Here is my experimental 3 day forecast on Emily {Not 5 this go around because of how quick she is forecast to dissipate}

Tonight: Into the BOC. Reorganizing, Max Winds: 80 mph
Tuesday: Approaching 2nd Mexican landfall. Max Winds: 95 mph
Wednesday: Well Inland, dying off slowly. Extratropical Max Winds: 45
mph

DISCLAIMER:
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#2 Postby Swimdude » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:11 pm

I agree with everything except:

but since she may make landfall again in the next 24-36 hrs.. she won't really have time to bomb out.


We saw Dennis come back from category 1 status. Emily could do it too.
0 likes   

mike18xx

#3 Postby mike18xx » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:23 pm

Given Emily's small(er than before) size at landfall, such weakening can be expected. -- She didn't have Gilbert's monstrous windfield.
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#4 Postby Swimdude » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:16 pm

Well... The 11 p.m. advisory sure did a number on this forecast huh... :eek:
0 likes   

jax

#5 Postby jax » Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:56 pm

Emily was never in the BOC...
0 likes   

User avatar
Stratusxpeye
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:40 am
Location: Tampa, Florida
Contact:

#6 Postby Stratusxpeye » Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:59 pm

Swimdude wrote:I agree with everything except:

but since she may make landfall again in the next 24-36 hrs.. she won't really have time to bomb out.


We saw Dennis come back from category 1 status. Emily could do it too.


But Dennis had alot farther to regain strength and IMO much better conditions.
0 likes   

User avatar
Astro_man92
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
Contact:

#7 Postby Astro_man92 » Tue Jul 19, 2005 2:23 pm

jax wrote:Emily was never in the BOC...

ok what is a BOC
0 likes   

User avatar
Astro_man92
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
Contact:

#8 Postby Astro_man92 » Tue Jul 19, 2005 2:24 pm

mike18xx wrote:Given Emily's small(er than before) size at landfall, such weakening can be expected. -- She didn't have Gilbert's monstrous windfield.
no kiden
0 likes   

User avatar
baitism
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:00 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS

#9 Postby baitism » Tue Jul 19, 2005 2:24 pm

Astro_man92 wrote:
jax wrote:Emily was never in the BOC...

ok what is a BOC


Bay of Campeche
0 likes   

gkrangers

#10 Postby gkrangers » Tue Jul 19, 2005 2:25 pm

Astro_man92 wrote:
jax wrote:Emily was never in the BOC...

ok what is a BOC
Bay of Campeche.

Its the southwest part of the Gulf of Mexico.
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

#11 Postby drezee » Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:27 pm

Here is my experimental 3 day forecast on Emily {Not 5 this go around because of how quick she is forecast to dissipate}

Tonight: Into the BOC. Reorganizing, Max Winds: 80 mph
Tuesday: Approaching 2nd Mexican landfall. Max Winds: 95mph
Wednesday: Well Inland, dying off slowly. Extratropical Max Winds: 45 mph


Is that a black feather I see?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests