Santorum's bill discussed on MSN's Slate...

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

Santorum's bill discussed on MSN's Slate...

#1 Postby stormie_skies » Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:15 am

I don't know if this belongs here or in the weather section, and I am not trying to start a debate (so feel free to lock it or move it if necessary), but I thought the people here might want to know that this story is getting a little bit of attention somewhere in the media where people might actually notice it:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2123557/

At the bottom of the article is a link to the Fray, where anyone with an MSN/Hotmail account can discuss the bill (without clogging up the board here and giving the mods a headache :wink: ).
0 likes   

User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

#2 Postby TexasStooge » Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:33 am

I'm not even gonna comment on what Santorum the dork has in mind.
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter

User avatar
The Big Dog
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 8:30 am
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

#3 Postby The Big Dog » Tue Aug 02, 2005 12:31 pm

I like how the writer titled the article: The AccuWeather Protection Act of 2005.

That sums it up.

Excellent article, BTW. Pretty much summarizes the main arguments we've made (over and over and over) on this board.
0 likes   

User avatar
tropical
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 5:35 am
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida
Contact:

#4 Postby tropical » Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:19 pm

There are two possible responses to AccuWeather's suggestion that competition with NWS would wipe it out.

One possibile response is that it isn't true—that AccuWeather might be mildly inconvenienced by the government's dissemination of weather information, but that consumers will always want AccuWeather's prettier weather maps. If it turned out that the federal government was withholding vital weather information from AccuWeather to such an extent that the company couldn't make its prettier maps, the true free-market solution would be for AccuWeather to start collecting its own damn data—not for AccuWeather to go crying to Santorum for legislative relief.

The other possible response to AccuWeather's whining is that it is true—that the NWS will squash AccuWeather like a bug by providing taxpayers with the weather information that they, ahem, already paid for, instead of leaving it to AccuWeather to charge taxpayers a second time for access to that information. That obviously would be a problem for AccuWeather. But why should the rest of us care?

Well said.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#5 Postby Stephanie » Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

EXCELLENT article!! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#6 Postby Stephanie » Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:32 pm

When I get home, I'm going to e-mail the author and thank him for the article.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests