My Forecast for TD-18 (RITA)

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Anonymous

My Forecast for TD-18 (RITA)

#1 Postby Anonymous » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:18 am

The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Image

12 HRS: 45 KT
24 HRS: 65 KT
36 HRS: 85 KT
48 HRS: 90 KT (NEAR FL KEYS)
72 HRS: 105 KT
96 HRS: 110 KT
120 HRS: 120 KT
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#2 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:30 am

Dangerous, yet it (unfortunately) sounds likely at this point.
Last edited by WindRunner on Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#3 Postby Swimdude » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:35 am

Yup, no disagreements here. The NHC always under-estimates the intensity; we all know that. This is certainly more possible.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7240
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#4 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:38 am

Swimdude wrote:Yup, no disagreements here. The NHC always under-estimates the intensity; we all know that. This is certainly more possible.


they dont always underestimte intensity. if you read the discussions which i doubt, you would know that intensity forecasting is a real mystery. lets hope it doesnt get too strong and hit your area. good luck
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#5 Postby hicksta » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:39 am

I think you might be a little to far south, intesity probably right on sadly =/
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#6 Postby LAwxrgal » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:40 am

Unfortunately I agree with you regarding intensity. The water in that part of the Gulf is boiling as the eastern GOM was for Kat. My guess is the further north she goes the weaker she will be, and the further west she goes the stronger she will be.
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

User avatar
ChaserUK
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 4:10 pm
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Contact:

#7 Postby ChaserUK » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:43 am

yep that water is darn hot at the moment - not sure what you guys think of these charts but they do paint a poor picture of what we could expect.


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1606
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Keene, NH
Contact:

#8 Postby wxwatcher91 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:53 am

I still want to stay conservative on the strength. (and this is saying something because I usually am way too liberal with the strength lol)

I think that the dry air over the Gulf might limit some of the strengthing...
STILL I'm thinking it could reach 120-130 at landfall in the Gulf...

I'm not sure...
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#9 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:57 am

wxwatcher91 wrote:I still want to stay conservative on the strength. (and this is saying something because I usually am way too liberal with the strength lol)

I think that the dry air over the Gulf might limit some of the strengthing...
STILL I'm thinking it could reach 120-130 at landfall in the Gulf...

I'm not sure...


A strong 3, nearly a Cat 4 (well above any model guidance) is conservative? ;-)
0 likes   

User avatar
wxwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1606
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Keene, NH
Contact:

#10 Postby wxwatcher91 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:08 pm

wxman57 wrote:
wxwatcher91 wrote:I still want to stay conservative on the strength. (and this is saying something because I usually am way too liberal with the strength lol)

I think that the dry air over the Gulf might limit some of the strengthing...
STILL I'm thinking it could reach 120-130 at landfall in the Gulf...

I'm not sure...


A strong 3, nearly a Cat 4 (well above any model guidance) is conservative? ;-)


1) compared to Floydbusters 120kt prediction
and
2) compared to my usual 200kt predictions :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

#11 Postby Portastorm » Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:09 pm

wxwatcher91 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
wxwatcher91 wrote:I still want to stay conservative on the strength. (and this is saying something because I usually am way too liberal with the strength lol)

I think that the dry air over the Gulf might limit some of the strengthing...
STILL I'm thinking it could reach 120-130 at landfall in the Gulf...

I'm not sure...


A strong 3, nearly a Cat 4 (well above any model guidance) is conservative? ;-)


1) compared to Floydbusters 120kt prediction
and
2) compared to my usual 200kt predictions :lol:


You'd like to see the rating system go up to Cat 10, wouldn't you?!

HA! :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
wxwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1606
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Keene, NH
Contact:

#12 Postby wxwatcher91 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:49 pm

Portastorm wrote:
wxwatcher91 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
wxwatcher91 wrote:I still want to stay conservative on the strength. (and this is saying something because I usually am way too liberal with the strength lol)

I think that the dry air over the Gulf might limit some of the strengthing...
STILL I'm thinking it could reach 120-130 at landfall in the Gulf...

I'm not sure...


A strong 3, nearly a Cat 4 (well above any model guidance) is conservative? ;-)


1) compared to Floydbusters 120kt prediction
and
2) compared to my usual 200kt predictions :lol:


You'd like to see the rating system go up to Cat 10, wouldn't you?!

HA! :lol:


8-) :wink: :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
EDR1222
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1253
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:58 pm
Location: Melbourne, FL

#13 Postby EDR1222 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 1:20 pm

Hopefully, if it does become a strong hurricane, it will do so over the open Gulf of Mexico and maybe have a chance to weaken before it comes ashore anywhere. The biggest concern would be in the western Gulf where the waters are extremely warm right now.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 294 guests