Tampa Tribune Article

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Cookiely
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3211
Age: 74
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

Tampa Tribune Article

#1 Postby Cookiely » Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:32 am

Did anyone see the Tampa Tribune article this week on studying the radar images of Charley? I can't for the life of me see what good studying the increase in wind speeds of the hurricane two hours from landfall. If you know the hurricane is strengthening at that point it would be too late for anyone to do anything but hunker down. Why is this going to be helpful as a predictor.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23007
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#2 Postby wxman57 » Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:55 am

I didn't see the article, but we can't know too much about rapid intensification cycles. Knowing what might have contributed to Charley's rapid intensification just prior to landfall may help forecasters predict such rapid intensification cycles long before landfall, perhaps days in the future.
0 likes   

O Town
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5205
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W

#3 Postby O Town » Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:10 am

Heres the article.
http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGBDELOTOZE.html

I think its great that they may be able to read winds with accuracy from this model along with radar. Much better than waiting every hour for recon.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

#4 Postby jinftl » Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:30 am

Gathering data is key to understanding hurricanes. Not sure the post-analysis is just done to pinpoint the strength of a given storm.....the applications of any knowledge gained is much broader.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#5 Postby gatorcane » Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:01 pm

wxman57 wrote:I didn't see the article, but we can't know too much about rapid intensification cycles. Knowing what might have contributed to Charley's rapid intensification just prior to landfall may help forecasters predict such rapid intensification cycles long before landfall, perhaps days in the future.


Wouldn't you say that since the water temps were approaching 90F off the SW coast of Florida that would be a reason for rapid intensification? I think so.
0 likes   

CycloneJim
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:29 pm
Location: Islamorada Florida
Contact:

#6 Postby CycloneJim » Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:35 pm

One main reason for the rapid intensification of hurricane Charley was the position of the tropical cyclone in reference to the approaching trough over the east central U.S. There was a strong SW flow ahead of the trough that was perfectly placed just to the north of the anticyclone over the top of the hurricane. This feature created strong divergence to the north and which caused rapid deepening. A similar scenario occured as hurricane Wilma approached the SW coast of Florida. If Wilma had a smaller eyewall like Charley and was a month earlier we would have easily had a strong cat-4 instead of a cat-3.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, cajungal, Cpv17, galaxy401, Google Adsense [Bot], Hurricaneman, islandgirl45, LAF92, LemieT, ljmac75, NONAME, Pelicane, Sambucol2024, StPeteMike, Stratton23, TomballEd and 105 guests