Does the fact that we have had a 99L mean there have been 99 waves or somethings with a relatively low pressure worthy of giving a number to since the beginning of hurricane season?
How does that compare with 2005 at this date for the Atlantic?
???L - 2007 v. 2005
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
???L - 2007 v. 2005
0 likes
-
JonathanBelles
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 11430
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
- Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
- Contact:
Re: ???L - 2007 v. 2005
RBDnhm wrote:Does the fact that we have had a 99L mean there have been 99 waves or somethings with a relatively low pressure worthy of giving a number to since the beginning of hurricane season?
How does that compare with 2005 at this date for the Atlantic?
No, invests are given numbers 90-99L and it has now gone through that cycle twice or three times this season.
0 likes
Re: ???L - 2007 v. 2005
Thank you for the reply. Why start at 90? Since named storms start at "A", why not start with 1 for invests?
0 likes
-
JonathanBelles
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 11430
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
- Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
- Contact:
Re: ???L - 2007 v. 2005
RBDnhm wrote:Thank you for the reply. Why start at 90? Since named storms start at "A", why not start with 1 for invests?
I forget what the all the numbers mean, but each set of numbers has a different use. IE 80-89L are tests (i think) and there are other uses but I forgot what they all are.
0 likes
-
wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: ???L - 2007 v. 2005
RBDnhm wrote:Thank you for the reply. Why start at 90? Since named storms start at "A", why not start with 1 for invests?
If we started with 1 for invests, there would be confusion between invests and named storms.
0 likes
-
Cryomaniac
- Category 5
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
- Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
- Contact:
Wasn't 50L used for that south atlantic hurricane?-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34005
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
1-49 are for actual tropical cyclones.
50-69 are reserved for special use. (i.e. Cyclone Catarina was 50L)
70-79 are for internal use for training purposes.
80-89 are for test invests.
90-99 are for operational invests.
Each one repeats itself after a cycle is completed (I doubt we will ever have to go from 49x to 01x in any basin though).
50-69 are reserved for special use. (i.e. Cyclone Catarina was 50L)
70-79 are for internal use for training purposes.
80-89 are for test invests.
90-99 are for operational invests.
Each one repeats itself after a cycle is completed (I doubt we will ever have to go from 49x to 01x in any basin though).
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Beef Stew, cajungal, floridasun, Google [Bot], Killjoy12, LAF92, riapal, wileytheartist and 36 guests