SnowintheFalls wrote:On another note, it looks like the board is going to hit 100 pages in December!
100th

Moderator: S2k Moderators
SnowintheFalls wrote:On another note, it looks like the board is going to hit 100 pages in December!
SnowintheFalls wrote:On another note, it looks like the board is going to hit 100 pages in December!
bubba hotep wrote:SnowintheFalls wrote:On another note, it looks like the board is going to hit 100 pages in December!
The CMC 1st and then the Euro brought this thread back to life lol
SnowintheFalls wrote:Maybe I am reading the models wrong but is there a reason WF is not included in the WSW yet? Seems like the models have consistently shown wintry precip over us.
Jarodm12 wrote:EnnisTx wrote:Looks like the system will track along the Red River. It looks like this will be a wait and see if it tracks North or further South.
Yes but take into consideration the GFS is the warmest if the temps are like the other guidance it's a major winter storm for North Texas and southern Oklahoma
EnnisTx wrote:Jarodm12 wrote:EnnisTx wrote:Looks like the system will track along the Red River. It looks like this will be a wait and see if it tracks North or further South.
Yes but take into consideration the GFS is the warmest if the temps are like the other guidance it's a major winter storm for North Texas and southern Oklahoma
I'm going to step out there and say this will turn ugly for DFW Metro. I want snow like everyone else, but ice is dangerous and costly...
bubba hotep wrote:SnowintheFalls wrote:Maybe I am reading the models wrong but is there a reason WF is not included in the WSW yet? Seems like the models have consistently shown wintry precip over us.
I haven't seen the discussion yet, but I would guess that the current watches were hoisted for the chance of freezing rain on the front end. The snow the models are showing gets cranking a bit later giving the WFOs more time to mull their options.
rwfromkansas wrote:Is the system on land yet?
Yukon Cornelius wrote:SnowintheFalls wrote:Maybe I am reading the models wrong but is there a reason WF is not included in the WSW yet? Seems like the models have consistently shown wintry precip over us.
Have you seen The Weather Channels forecast for WF?!
Jarodm12 wrote:18z fv3 nails northern Texas and southern Oklahoma and it's probably still too warm wow
Cerlin wrote:Jarodm12 wrote:18z fv3 nails northern Texas and southern Oklahoma and it's probably still too warm wow
Nothing but rain for DFW.
Cerlin wrote:Jarodm12 wrote:18z fv3 nails northern Texas and southern Oklahoma and it's probably still too warm wow
Nothing but rain for DFW.
EnnisTx wrote:Cerlin wrote:Jarodm12 wrote:18z fv3 nails northern Texas and southern Oklahoma and it's probably still too warm wow
Nothing but rain for DFW.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... _us_14.png
Doesn’t look like rain.
EnnisTx wrote:Cerlin wrote:Jarodm12 wrote:18z fv3 nails northern Texas and southern Oklahoma and it's probably still too warm wow
Nothing but rain for DFW.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... _us_14.png
Doesn’t look like rain.
Captmorg70 wrote:EnnisTx wrote:Cerlin wrote:Nothing but rain for DFW.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... _us_14.png
Doesn’t look like rain.
Can’t do a sounding for FV3 on TT. But surface temp over DFW during the time is shows the “snow” is 37-39
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests