Also, the piece of energy we are interested in is still part of the larger trough in the NPAC and hasn't sheared off yet.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
bubba hotep wrote:Not sure it means much, given it's the 12k NAM, but the s/w is stronger and slower through 57hrs.
Also, the piece of energy we are interested in is still part of the larger trough in the NPAC and hasn't sheared off yet.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2024011118/gfs_z500_vort_namer_2.png
Ntxw wrote:Brent wrote:Ntxw wrote:18z Euro is mostly snow north of I-20. Makes sense, it's hard to mix with such low temps. Mixed bag south into C TX.
It's way drier though which concerns me. We've come too far today to go backwards and I really hope the 0z reserves it
For Oklahoma yeah. For TX we are trending better. There's an STJ linkage. Two precip shields converging.
The STJ component is wild card. It will provide much more qpf the more it can get injected into the flow within the southern sector. This is why guidance intensifies the band as it crosses Red River.
rwfromkansas wrote:Ntxw wrote:Brent wrote:
It's way drier though which concerns me. We've come too far today to go backwards and I really hope the 0z reserves it
For Oklahoma yeah. For TX we are trending better. There's an STJ linkage. Two precip shields converging.
The STJ component is wild card. It will provide much more qpf the more it can get injected into the flow within the southern sector. This is why guidance intensifies the band as it crosses Red River.
Unless a Gulf low sucks up all the moisture like happens a lot it seems. Lol.
Texas Snow wrote:rwfromkansas wrote:Ntxw wrote:
For Oklahoma yeah. For TX we are trending better. There's an STJ linkage. Two precip shields converging.
The STJ component is wild card. It will provide much more qpf the more it can get injected into the flow within the southern sector. This is why guidance intensifies the band as it crosses Red River.
Unless a Gulf low sucks up all the moisture like happens a lot it seems. Lol.
https://media1.tenor.com/m/UwSX0RlXgWMAAAAd/you-take-that-back-take-that-back.gif
rwfromkansas wrote:Ntxw wrote:Brent wrote:
It's way drier though which concerns me. We've come too far today to go backwards and I really hope the 0z reserves it
For Oklahoma yeah. For TX we are trending better. There's an STJ linkage. Two precip shields converging.
The STJ component is wild card. It will provide much more qpf the more it can get injected into the flow within the southern sector. This is why guidance intensifies the band as it crosses Red River.
Unless a Gulf low sucks up all the moisture like happens a lot it seems. Lol.
orangeblood wrote:Now in RGEM range…
https://images.weatherbell.com/model/rgem-all/tx/instant_ptype/1705017600/1705320000-agCp97IYWXc.png
mmmmsnouts wrote:Liquid equivalent of sleet averages 2.5 to 1 so you would need roughly 0.4” QPF to get an inch of sleet. That RGEM run might not even be enough to mess up the roads in DFW.
bubba hotep wrote:Not sure it means much, given it's the 12k NAM, but the s/w is stronger and slower through 57hrs.
Also, the piece of energy we are interested in is still part of the larger trough in the NPAC and hasn't sheared off yet.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2024011118/gfs_z500_vort_namer_2.png
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests