

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Cerlin wrote:All of this talk about potential damage and long lasting impact is exactly why IMO, every single meteorologist needs to be more bullish than conservative. I’m not an expert and I can’t make their decisions, but I’d rather say that we’ll have potentially record breaking cold and forecast some lows in the single digits all the way to the gulf coast and have it bust by 10-20° than be too conservative and not educate the public about how crucial proper preparation is for the cold snap. I get the notion that meteorologists should avoid alarmist rhetoric but I feel like the guidance is strong enough that we are in for something that only happens a few times a lifetime. I’d rather not chance it.
Cerlin wrote:All of this talk about potential damage and long lasting impact is exactly why IMO, every single meteorologist needs to be more bullish than conservative. I’m not an expert and I can’t make their decisions, but I’d rather say that we’ll have potentially record breaking cold and forecast some lows in the single digits all the way to the gulf coast and have it bust by 10-20° than be too conservative and not educate the public about how crucial proper preparation is for the cold snap. I get the notion that meteorologists should avoid alarmist rhetoric but I feel like the guidance is strong enough that we are in for something that only happens a few times a lifetime. I’d rather not chance it.
Cerlin wrote:All of this talk about potential damage and long lasting impact is exactly why IMO, every single meteorologist needs to be more bullish than conservative. I’m not an expert and I can’t make their decisions, but I’d rather say that we’ll have potentially record breaking cold and forecast some lows in the single digits all the way to the gulf coast and have it bust by 10-20° than be too conservative and not educate the public about how crucial proper preparation is for the cold snap. I get the notion that meteorologists should avoid alarmist rhetoric but I feel like the guidance is strong enough that we are in for something that only happens a few times a lifetime. I’d rather not chance it.
Texas Snowman wrote:@BigJoeBastardi - The State ot Texas is going to be tested on so many levels, I hope gvt and EMA is ready. There will be little wind in west Texas while the core of the cold which may drive temperatures to 0 in Austin, single digits IAH/SAT teens valley hit after major snow/ice storm.
——-
@BigJoeBastardi - This is as close to the Feb 1899 outbreak as I have ever seen as that had a lot of snow also. 1983 and 1985. had less. This is by far the coldest this century. Humanitarian interests with immigration plus blackouts in extreme cold big concern, at least to me
——-
@BigJoeBastardi - I feel like its 5 days before Harvey, except in a winter event
funster wrote:It seems like Dallas should possibly be under ice storm warning based on that new discussion? They say 1/4 or more of freezing rain possible but chose not to go with it. Maybe I am missing something.
Brent wrote:Cerlin wrote:All of this talk about potential damage and long lasting impact is exactly why IMO, every single meteorologist needs to be more bullish than conservative. I’m not an expert and I can’t make their decisions, but I’d rather say that we’ll have potentially record breaking cold and forecast some lows in the single digits all the way to the gulf coast and have it bust by 10-20° than be too conservative and not educate the public about how crucial proper preparation is for the cold snap. I get the notion that meteorologists should avoid alarmist rhetoric but I feel like the guidance is strong enough that we are in for something that only happens a few times a lifetime. I’d rather not chance it.
just saw a TV met talk about the coldest in 3 yearsI don't think people realize how historic this could be when this stuff is on TV. How many more maps do they need?
Texas Snowman wrote:Brent wrote:Cerlin wrote:All of this talk about potential damage and long lasting impact is exactly why IMO, every single meteorologist needs to be more bullish than conservative. I’m not an expert and I can’t make their decisions, but I’d rather say that we’ll have potentially record breaking cold and forecast some lows in the single digits all the way to the gulf coast and have it bust by 10-20° than be too conservative and not educate the public about how crucial proper preparation is for the cold snap. I get the notion that meteorologists should avoid alarmist rhetoric but I feel like the guidance is strong enough that we are in for something that only happens a few times a lifetime. I’d rather not chance it.
just saw a TV met talk about the coldest in 3 yearsI don't think people realize how historic this could be when this stuff is on TV. How many more maps do they need?
Coldest in 3 years? Wow. Still some days to go, but not many. If some (or all) of this verifies we’re talking the potential for ALL-TIME record cold and the coldest siege in 122 years!
Texas Snowman wrote:Brent wrote:Cerlin wrote:All of this talk about potential damage and long lasting impact is exactly why IMO, every single meteorologist needs to be more bullish than conservative. I’m not an expert and I can’t make their decisions, but I’d rather say that we’ll have potentially record breaking cold and forecast some lows in the single digits all the way to the gulf coast and have it bust by 10-20° than be too conservative and not educate the public about how crucial proper preparation is for the cold snap. I get the notion that meteorologists should avoid alarmist rhetoric but I feel like the guidance is strong enough that we are in for something that only happens a few times a lifetime. I’d rather not chance it.
just saw a TV met talk about the coldest in 3 yearsI don't think people realize how historic this could be when this stuff is on TV. How many more maps do they need?
Coldest in 3 years? Wow. Still some days to go, but not many. If some (or all) of this verifies we’re talking the potential for ALL-TIME record cold and the coldest siege in 122 years!
Brent wrote:Texas Snowman wrote:Brent wrote:
just saw a TV met talk about the coldest in 3 yearsI don't think people realize how historic this could be when this stuff is on TV. How many more maps do they need?
Coldest in 3 years? Wow. Still some days to go, but not many. If some (or all) of this verifies we’re talking the potential for ALL-TIME record cold and the coldest siege in 122 years!
Not to mention when it was that cold 3 years ago it warmed up fast...
okay Dan Henry just said coldest in 25 years on air... that was better
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests