Texas Winter 2013-2014
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.-
frank92171
- Tropical Wave

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:35 pm
- Location: Marrero,la
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Can you elaborate on why dew point is so important? New to this and would like to understand better what we are looking for. Thanks
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re:
Ntxw wrote:To me the surface temperature isn't that important. What I want to know is how did the balloon launch from Tamu and UH do? Would like to see what the temperature profile is above which is far more critical.
UH is tomorrow at 11am I believe....I got one of my kids birthday balloons....let me tie my weather station to it. Hang on...
0 likes
-
HurricaneHunter914
- Category 5

- Posts: 4439
- Age: 32
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Re:
Ntxw wrote:To me the surface temperature isn't that important. What I want to know is how did the balloon launch from Tamu and UH do? Would like to see what the temperature profile is above which is far more critical.
Texas A&M launches after 10:30 tonight.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
weatherguy425
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX > Lubbock, TX > Savannah, GA
- Contact:
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Ntxw wrote:To me the surface temperature isn't that important. What I want to know is how did the balloon launch from Tamu and UH do? Would like to see what the temperature profile is above which is far more critical.
I may be wrong - BUT - I don't believe the launch, at least at UH, will occur until mid-morning tomorrow. Wxman was chatting about it at KHOU. Reasoning was that column would be different by tomorrow morning anyway, so, delayed launch until it was 'crunch-time'.
0 likes
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator

- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.
0 likes
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.
-
BigB0882
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA
- Contact:
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
frank92171 wrote:Can you elaborate on why dew point is so important? New to this and would like to understand better what we are looking for. Thanks
Take a look at Janie2006's post in the Deep South thread. I would copy and paste but not without their permission.
0 likes
- TeamPlayersBlue
- Category 5

- Posts: 3462
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
- Location: Denver/Applewood, CO
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
BigB0882
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA
- Contact:
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.
Oh I hope you are right and I hope it maintains the better look all the way through the run so we all can hope for more FUN!
0 likes
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.
But it has about the same qpf up to 0.10 inch for most of SE Texas, a little less for the northern areas than the 12z run.
0 likes
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.
-
frank92171
- Tropical Wave

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:35 pm
- Location: Marrero,la
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
BigB0882 wrote:frank92171 wrote:Can you elaborate on why dew point is so important? New to this and would like to understand better what we are looking for. Thanks
Take a look at Janie2006's post in the Deep South thread. I would copy and paste but not without their permission.
Sorry, I just saw it in that thread. Thanks for the answer. Kinda understand better.
0 likes
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator

- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
BigB0882 wrote:Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.
Oh I hope you are right and I hope it maintains the better look all the way through the run so we all can hope for more FUN!
What I'm taking away from this GFS run is that clearly the Mexican system wasn't sampled well. And some of that upper level energy is going to end up much closer to Texas. And as I said earlier, the early outbreak of precip in the Hill Country, well west of where it was supposed to start, should show us that the precip chances for SC and SE Texas are more enhanced than what earlier models showed. Probably also due to this system having some connection with Pacific jet moisture. I'd shudder to start guessing about actual QPF/accumulation amounts but clearly it's looking much better than it did 6 hours ago even.
0 likes
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator

- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Ntxw wrote:Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.
But it has about the same qpf up to 0.10 inch for most of SE Texas, a little less for the northern areas than the 12z run.
I saw that and as I just wrote, I'm not buying it. It's early precip predictions don't even match with what's going on in the Hill Country. The takeway is models didn't capturre system well and it's going to be further north.
0 likes
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Portastorm wrote:Ntxw wrote:Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.
But it has about the same qpf up to 0.10 inch for most of SE Texas, a little less for the northern areas than the 12z run.
I saw that and as I just wrote, I'm not buying it. It's early precip predictions don't even match with what's going on in the Hill Country. The takeway is models didn't capturre system well and it's going to be further north.
They do have reflectivity in the hill country. There's stuff falling yes but there is no qpf equivalent to measure it by to say the model was wrong. Trace doesn't count as it right now.
0 likes
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.
-
Wntrwthrguy
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:48 pm
- Location: North Austin
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Portastorm wrote:BigB0882 wrote:Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.
Oh I hope you are right and I hope it maintains the better look all the way through the run so we all can hope for more FUN!
What I'm taking away from this GFS run is that clearly the Mexican system wasn't sampled well. And some of that upper level energy is going to end up much closer to Texas. And as I said earlier, the early outbreak of precip in the Hill Country, well west of where it was supposed to start, should show us that the precip chances for SC and SE Texas are more enhanced than what earlier models showed. Probably also due to this system having some connection with Pacific jet moisture. I'd shudder to start guessing about actual QPF/accumulation amounts but clearly it's looking much better than it did 6 hours ago even.
I agree Porta and this frequently happens due to the models not sampling the system well while it's over Mexico. Btw are you getting any precip currently? Radar shows some echoes over Austin.
0 likes
-
BigB0882
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA
- Contact:
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Portastorm wrote:Ntxw wrote:Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.
But it has about the same qpf up to 0.10 inch for most of SE Texas, a little less for the northern areas than the 12z run.
I saw that and as I just wrote, I'm not buying it. It's early precip predictions don't even match with what's going on in the Hill Country. The takeway is models didn't capturre system well and it's going to be further north.
I like you Porta.
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014
Darn the evening AFD update from HGX says I don't have much chance of snow accumulations tonight. I thought this evening's trends were looking good for me...
".UPDATE...
A SERIES OF SHORTWAVE DISTURBANCES MOVING ACROSS MEXICO WILL
ULTIMATELY BE THE SPARK THAT INITIATES WHATEVER LIFT WILL GENERATE
TUESDAY PRECIPITATION. WHILE NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO TRACK THE
PROGRESSION...OR DOWNSTREAM EVOLUTION...OF ENHANCED OMEGA/PVA
PRODUCED BY THESE WEAK WAVES THEY ARE NEVERTHELESS A MARKER TO TRACK
OR FOLLOW. TONIGHT'S UPDATES WERE TO TEMPS/POPS/WX THROUGH EARLY
WEDNESDAY NIGHT...MORE OF AN ADJUSTMENT. FOR POPS HAVE BLENDED THE
00Z NAM AND THE 12Z WRF (ARW) OF SWATHING HIGH CHANCE/LOW QPF UP
NORTH DURING THE MORNING...TRANSITIONING THIS FURTHER SOUTHEAST
TOWARDS THE COAST THROUGH THE LATE MORNING INTO EARLY AFTERNOON
HOURS. PRECIPITATION TYPE WILL BEGIN AS LIGHT RAIN OR SPRINKLES
BEFORE DAWN...TURNING OVER TO A WINTER MIX OF EITHER FREEZING RAIN
OR LIGHT SLEET ALONG AND NORTH THE HIGHWAY 105 CORRIDOR THROUGH THE
MORNING. THIS PRECIP TYPE WILL SPREAD TOWARDS THE COAST FROM MID-
LATE AM THROUGH EARLY AFTERNOON. CURRENT TEMPERATURES ARE RELATIVELY
WARM BUT...JUST UPSTREAM... TEMPS/DEW POINTS ARE BELOW
FREEZING/SINGLE DIGITS. THIS LOWER LAYER DRY AIR FILTERING IN MAY
THWART PRE-DAWN PRECIPITATION. THERE SHOULD BE ENOUGH SATURATION
FROM PACIFIC MOISTURE HIGH ENOUGH INTO THE UPPER LAYERS TOMORROW
MORNING FOR ICE CRYSTALS/ SUPERCOOLED DROPLETS TO PARTIALLY MELT
WITHIN A WARMER 5-10K FT LAYER...THEN PARTIALLY RE-FREEZE INTO SLEET
IN THE LOWER 5K FT. ROADWAYS MAY BECOME WET WITH EARLY DAY DRIZZLE
OR VERY LIGHT RAIN...THEN FREEZE THROUGH THE DAY. ICE FORMING ON
ELEVATED ROADS AND BRIDGES WILL BE THE MAIN IMPACT FOR TRAVEL
TOMORROW. ALL AND ALL...CURRENT THINKING IS THAT THIS EVENT WILL
UNFOLD SIMILAR TO FRIDAY'S EVENT. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THAT THERE
APPEARS TO BE LESS NORTHERN SNOW ACCUMULATION AND THERE MAY BE MORE
OF A SOUTHERN FORECAST AREA SLEET/ICE PROBLEM GOING INTO THE LATE
AFTERNOON INTO EARLY EVENING HOURS. 31"
".UPDATE...
A SERIES OF SHORTWAVE DISTURBANCES MOVING ACROSS MEXICO WILL
ULTIMATELY BE THE SPARK THAT INITIATES WHATEVER LIFT WILL GENERATE
TUESDAY PRECIPITATION. WHILE NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO TRACK THE
PROGRESSION...OR DOWNSTREAM EVOLUTION...OF ENHANCED OMEGA/PVA
PRODUCED BY THESE WEAK WAVES THEY ARE NEVERTHELESS A MARKER TO TRACK
OR FOLLOW. TONIGHT'S UPDATES WERE TO TEMPS/POPS/WX THROUGH EARLY
WEDNESDAY NIGHT...MORE OF AN ADJUSTMENT. FOR POPS HAVE BLENDED THE
00Z NAM AND THE 12Z WRF (ARW) OF SWATHING HIGH CHANCE/LOW QPF UP
NORTH DURING THE MORNING...TRANSITIONING THIS FURTHER SOUTHEAST
TOWARDS THE COAST THROUGH THE LATE MORNING INTO EARLY AFTERNOON
HOURS. PRECIPITATION TYPE WILL BEGIN AS LIGHT RAIN OR SPRINKLES
BEFORE DAWN...TURNING OVER TO A WINTER MIX OF EITHER FREEZING RAIN
OR LIGHT SLEET ALONG AND NORTH THE HIGHWAY 105 CORRIDOR THROUGH THE
MORNING. THIS PRECIP TYPE WILL SPREAD TOWARDS THE COAST FROM MID-
LATE AM THROUGH EARLY AFTERNOON. CURRENT TEMPERATURES ARE RELATIVELY
WARM BUT...JUST UPSTREAM... TEMPS/DEW POINTS ARE BELOW
FREEZING/SINGLE DIGITS. THIS LOWER LAYER DRY AIR FILTERING IN MAY
THWART PRE-DAWN PRECIPITATION. THERE SHOULD BE ENOUGH SATURATION
FROM PACIFIC MOISTURE HIGH ENOUGH INTO THE UPPER LAYERS TOMORROW
MORNING FOR ICE CRYSTALS/ SUPERCOOLED DROPLETS TO PARTIALLY MELT
WITHIN A WARMER 5-10K FT LAYER...THEN PARTIALLY RE-FREEZE INTO SLEET
IN THE LOWER 5K FT. ROADWAYS MAY BECOME WET WITH EARLY DAY DRIZZLE
OR VERY LIGHT RAIN...THEN FREEZE THROUGH THE DAY. ICE FORMING ON
ELEVATED ROADS AND BRIDGES WILL BE THE MAIN IMPACT FOR TRAVEL
TOMORROW. ALL AND ALL...CURRENT THINKING IS THAT THIS EVENT WILL
UNFOLD SIMILAR TO FRIDAY'S EVENT. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THAT THERE
APPEARS TO BE LESS NORTHERN SNOW ACCUMULATION AND THERE MAY BE MORE
OF A SOUTHERN FORECAST AREA SLEET/ICE PROBLEM GOING INTO THE LATE
AFTERNOON INTO EARLY EVENING HOURS. 31"
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests






