orangeblood wrote:downsouthman1 wrote:orangeblood wrote:EWX has to be a little concerned with the lack of precip depicted on the latest GFS and short range RAP models....it appears like they're going with the NAM output and that should give pause to most everyone on this board. Don't shoot the messenger, just speaking from experience
Keep in mind that there is a lower Warning criteria threshold in EWX & HGX CWAs versus FWD. That's specifically stated in the AFD by FWD.
Edit: Quote: "IT IS IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER THE RARITY OF SUCH WINTRY
PRECIPITATION IN THESE AREAS (THIS WINTER NOTWITHSTANDING) AND THE
LESSER WARNING CRITERIA IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO OUR CWA (EWX/HGX).``
I realize that but latest GFS for Austin has 0.02 inch qpf and even less north and west of I-35...qpf seems very borderline for winter storm warnings in Austin Metro IMO
Understood but one needs to put it in perspective. The GFS has been ramping up qpf values for AUS since yesterday's 18z run. Is today's 18z run an anomaly because it goes in the opposite direction? I mean, taking it from .36" on the 12z run to .02" is a bit much, don't you think? I'm not taking that too serious at this point. That's too dramatic of a change in just a six-hour cycle.
After everything I've seen this winter season I wouldn't rule out lesser qpf falling ... but that 18z GFS run is clearly an outlier at the moment.
orangeblood, I would add that the NWS Winter Weather Desk in its forecast issued earlier this afternoon showed the precip shield being further north than the Euro/SREF showed but a bit further south than NAM. No doubt that a further south moisture plume would impact qpf values in Austin. And yes, I have seen the latest HRRR-RAP (20z) which supports that contention. So I'm not going to shoot the messenger
but at this time, I'm not worried about the 18z GFS. If radar, real-time events support what the Euro/18z GFS suggest, then we can start to question whether or not Winter Storm Warning weather will actually impact the AUS metro area.