Ghost0321 wrote:Would you folks consider the CMC more accurate than the GEFS?
No, CMC is considered to have a cold bias
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Ghost0321 wrote:Would you folks consider the CMC more accurate than the GEFS?
TropicalTundra wrote:28 degrees this morning with a decent frost. MUCH more winter-like than 80 degree afternoons
Gotwood wrote:Cerlin wrote:NWS Norman is already putting 3 consecutive days of ice starting next week. Usually they wait to pull the trigger on those things. I’m seeing some good support for ice storms but I still think it’s much too early to call that, especially given how much temperatures can change even 5 days out.
What models are showing Oklahoma with ice? Only ones I saw had ice in Texas but dry in Oklahoma.
Tammie wrote:Gotwood wrote:Cerlin wrote:NWS Norman is already putting 3 consecutive days of ice starting next week. Usually they wait to pull the trigger on those things. I’m seeing some good support for ice storms but I still think it’s much too early to call that, especially given how much temperatures can change even 5 days out.
What models are showing Oklahoma with ice? Only ones I saw had ice in Texas but dry in Oklahoma.
It wasn’t a “model”. Read the “NWS Norman OK” area discussion write-up from this morning.
Tammie wrote:Gotwood wrote:Cerlin wrote:NWS Norman is already putting 3 consecutive days of ice starting next week. Usually they wait to pull the trigger on those things. I’m seeing some good support for ice storms but I still think it’s much too early to call that, especially given how much temperatures can change even 5 days out.
What models are showing Oklahoma with ice? Only ones I saw had ice in Texas but dry in Oklahoma.
Oh ok lol I was like what am I missing.
It wasn’t a “model”. Read the “NWS Norman OK” area discussion write-up from this morning.
Gotwood wrote:Tammie wrote:Gotwood wrote:What models are showing Oklahoma with ice? Only ones I saw had ice in Texas but dry in Oklahoma.
It wasn’t a “model”. Read the “NWS Norman OK” area discussion write-up from this morning.
Oh ok lol I was like what am I missing.
Iceresistance wrote:Gotwood wrote:Tammie wrote:It wasn’t a “model”. Read the “NWS Norman OK” area discussion write-up from this morning.
Oh ok lol I was like what am I missing.
I fixed your post
NWS-Norman is conservative for this because of the higher model uncertainty, but the potential is really high.
CaptinCrunch wrote:Iceresistance wrote:Gotwood wrote:Oh ok lol I was like what am I missing.
I fixed your post
NWS-Norman is conservative for this because of the higher model uncertainty, but the potential is really high.
It's the same for NWS FTW, until we get into the weekend and 72 hr model runs is when everyone is going to know whether or not your in the target zone.
Highs/Lows for mon-wed is key, if highs hover in the mid to lower 30s then we may see a sleet/rain mix, unless the column is deep enough to support snow. The big question will be the over night lows. If we do drop to or just below freezing then morning commutes are going to be a mess, and as we have seen in the past, once you get that layer of ice on the ground anything falling through out the day has the potential to accumulate regardless of precip type. Then you have the rinse and repeat effect of the same thing multiple mornings.
It best to start preparing for the possibility than be caught off guard at the time of the event. That's the fine line our NWS offices have to balance.
bubba hotep wrote:00z Euro looks like a repeat of this last system, with deep cutoff kicking out across Texas, plenty of QPF, but borderline cold.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/ecmwf/2023012600/ecmwf_z500_vort_us_54.png
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/ecmwf/2023012600/ecmwf_T850a_us_54.png
https://m1o.pivotalweather.com/maps/models/ecmwf_full/2023012600/198/sn10_acc-imp.us_sc.png
Iceresistance wrote:Just got this from KWTV
https://s9.gifyu.com/images/Screenshot-2023-01-26-9.20.57-AM.png
https://s9.gifyu.com/images/Screenshot-2023-01-26-9.20.57-AM.png
rwfromkansas wrote:The GEFS seems to be eroding the cold very fast. Only 3 days of actual cold, then back to 50s. I thought this was an extended cold event. Looks less likely now, just another tease.
Iceresistance wrote:rwfromkansas wrote:The GEFS seems to be eroding the cold very fast. Only 3 days of actual cold, then back to 50s. I thought this was an extended cold event. Looks less likely now, just another tease.
The models have a bad tendency of eroding the cold quicker than expected, the Shallow Cold Air will be horribly underestimated by the models as it ignores the upper level patterns.
rwfromkansas wrote:Iceresistance wrote:rwfromkansas wrote:The GEFS seems to be eroding the cold very fast. Only 3 days of actual cold, then back to 50s. I thought this was an extended cold event. Looks less likely now, just another tease.
The models have a bad tendency of eroding the cold quicker than expected, the Shallow Cold Air will be horribly underestimated by the models as it ignores the upper level patterns.
That's true. I guess I just thought the ensembles might pick it up better, but if very shallow it may miss it as well. But, that definitely means ice storm potential, which...ugh. No good.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 212 guests