Invest 97L dead.??. LOL ..take a look..seriously

[Aquawind]

Nope, that was a frontal low 300 miles west of the lat/lon you pointed to on the satellite which the NHC analyzed. Cut out the pranks, pls.

Holy Cow..

I think you need a chat room Aric. When your responding to so many of your own posts is kinda weird..

[Andy_L]

and please please please stop with the .. in the .. middle of sentences. makes the posts really difficult to read (and i do read them all )

[Bane]

Aric is pulling your legs, guys. There is no low associated with that small area of convection. The convection he's pointing to is east of 65W where pressures are 1025-1030mb, not along the frontal boundary to the west where that 1019mb low was analyzed. It's just remnants of the upper low. There is anticyclonic turning on the surface analysis. Aric knows there's nothing of significance in the area, at least I hope so!

Gotta catch a plane to New Orleans for a hurricane talk.

Actually there was a LOw there yeserday.. it is now heading over sub 24 degree water.. if you were one of the people that was able to see it before the nasa site went dark then you saw it.. but all the other post of satellite loops were not sufficient.. and you probably missed.. it..

but its over for sure now.. LLC is racing north.. leaving behind.. the convection.. its dead//

and it was analyzed... as being there.. by the nhc..

this never had a chance to become tropical in nature no matter how much you wanted it to do so. you can't miss what isn't there.

[Aric Dunn]

ok i admit i was having a little fun with it, but there was a low. at it was what was left of 97l, and it did have a burst of convection over the center before the Low moved over very cool water..

that part was real everything else was a little exaderation.. the low was there!!


so go ahead a lock or end the thread if you want