Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

#1 Postby drezee » Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:06 am

0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#2 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:14 pm

Hopefully people don't read that and try to use that as an excuse not to be prepared though. Less activity does not mean no activity, and devastating storms can and do happen in low-number seasons.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15981
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

#3 Postby Kingarabian » Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:11 pm

It's just that one storm man. Never underestimate these storms no matter what forecasts say.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

#4 Postby wxman57 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm

1992 was a "quiet year" (numbers-wise)...
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

#5 Postby Ptarmigan » Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:47 pm

wxman57 wrote:1992 was a "quiet year" (numbers-wise)...


Cough! Andrew! Cough!
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

#6 Postby HurricaneBill » Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:44 pm

Other quiet years with destructive storms:

1957: Audrey
1960: Donna
1965: Betsy
1972: Agnes
1977: Anita
1983: Alicia
1991: Bob
1992: Andrew

Also remember the 1996 EPAC season. Although only 8 named storms formed, Mexico was impacted by 4 hurricanes (Alma, Boris, Fausto, Hernan)
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

#7 Postby SFLcane » Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:49 pm

wxman57 wrote:1992 was a "quiet year" (numbers-wise)...


Care to share what areas your thinking might see a threat this season? :ggreen:
0 likes   

hurricanehunter69
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 5:21 pm
Location: New Orleans

Re: Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

#8 Postby hurricanehunter69 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:30 pm

The A and B storms are apparently the ones to watch out for in the "quiet" years.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

#9 Postby wxman57 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:45 pm

SFLcane wrote:
wxman57 wrote:1992 was a "quiet year" (numbers-wise)...


Care to share what areas your thinking might see a threat this season? :ggreen:


Nope, not a clue at this time.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

#10 Postby wxman57 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:49 pm

hurricanehunter69 wrote:The A and B storms are apparently the ones to watch out for in the "quiet" years.


That was certainly true in the "old days", when the A and B storms occurred in August or even September. These days, the A and B storms are often weak or subtropical storms in April, May or early June. Only 2 of those storms listed occurred before mid August (Audrey & Agnes), and 3 of then struck in September (Donna, Betsy and Anita).
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1731
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

#11 Postby OuterBanker » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:16 am

Yep, to me it look like they are going to say somewhere between 85 and 100 ntc. They also seem hesitant to even say it because of the press and general public's perception. No doubt that the press will downplay the numbers and express it as good news. The biggest problem is that it has become a numbers game, a most dangerous attitude. My biggest fear is that it will become an excuse for not preparing at all. I also see what could be a potential problem developing this year. So far the east Atlantic is unusually cool which means that the Cape Verde season will be greatly suppressed. This will mean fewer storms, but it will also mean fewer re-curvatures. My biggest fear is that we will have more close in developments. The ones that develop closer to the US and islands. The ones that blow up and develop quickly and strike land. And no one has prepared. I have no doubt that one of these seasons this will happen, I pray it's not his year. One more thing. If you have twenty-five hurricanes in a season and none hit land, is it really an active season? If you have only three hurricanes in a season, but all hit land is it really inactive? We really need to rethink the numbers game.
0 likes   

Jagno
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:40 pm
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: Colorado State Abstract says likely less activity

#12 Postby Jagno » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:19 pm

I read this today that the weather service decided to battle complacency with some fairly strong reminders of the visual destruction that can be created from hurricane force winds. Sadly, seeing is believing for most people and if this gets one person to prepare then it's worth it.

http://now.msn.com/now/0331-weather-ser ... rning.aspx
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cheezyWXguy, Google Adsense [Bot] and 40 guests