5 PM advisory=OFFICIALLY WNW at 12 mph=22.6n-62.6w

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145469
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

5 PM advisory=OFFICIALLY WNW at 12 mph=22.6n-62.6w

#1 Postby cycloneye » Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:32 pm

Last edited by cycloneye on Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Deenac813
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:16 pm
Location: Hollywood, Florida

#2 Postby Deenac813 » Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:46 pm

Good news for us here is S Fla..

Deena
0 likes   

Josephine96

#3 Postby Josephine96 » Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:49 pm

The big question of course.. is will she stay that way... Florida is not all clear till it's Northwest, North, or North of 30 degrees North.. whichever comes 1st..
0 likes   

Deenac813
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:16 pm
Location: Hollywood, Florida

#4 Postby Deenac813 » Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:51 pm

Josephine96 wrote:The big question of course.. is will she stay that way... Florida is not all clear till it's Northwest, North, or North of 30 degrees North.. whichever comes 1st..


I realize that.. I did not say we were "all clear" by any means.. I personally just think it is good news for us that she is going WNW.. IMO of course!

Deena
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145469
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#5 Postby cycloneye » Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:52 pm

Yep good news indeed but still watch that track just in case it deviates to the west but I think this will be a NC northward landfall.
Last edited by cycloneye on Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

And the discussion...

#6 Postby Steve Cosby » Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:56 pm

Discussion is here. Classic Stewart in structure and information.

WTNT43 KNHC 132046
TCDAT3
HURRICANE ISABEL DISCUSSION NUMBER 31
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
5 PM EDT SAT SEP 13 2003

THERE HAS BEEN A PLETHORA OF WIND DATA FROM BOTH THE AIR FORCE RESERVE AND NOAA HURRICANE HUNTERS THIS AFTERNOON. IN SUMMARY...THE AIRCRAFT FOUND MAXIMUM 700 MB FLIGHT-LEVEL WINDS OF 157 AND 158 KT ...ALONG WITH A DROPSONDE WIND VALUE OF 178 KT...OR 205 MPH...AT 879 MB...ALL OF WHICH CORRESPONDS TO SURFACE WIND ESTIMATES OF 141-142 KT. THEREFORE...THE INITIAL INTENSITY HAS BEEN INCREASED TO 140 KT/160 MPH...SO ISABEL IS A CATEGORY 5 HURRICANE ONCE AGAIN.

THE INITIAL MOTION ESTIMATE IS NOW 285/11. THIS MAY BE A SHORT-TERM ACCELERATION DUE TO THE EYE CONTRACTING DOWN IN SIZE AND RE-ADJUSTING WITHIN THE CENTRAL DEEP CONVECTION. HOWEVER...THE 285 DEGREES MOTION NOW APPEARS TO BE A STEADY TREND. THE NEW 12Z GFS FORECAST TRACK HAS COME IN ALMOST ON TOP OF THE PREVIOUS OFFICAL FORECAST THROUGH 48 HOURS AND THEN IS LEFT OF THE TRACK BY 72 HOURS ...BEFORE HOOKING BACK ACROSS THE PREVIOUS FORECAST TRACK AND ACCELERATING ISABEL NORTHWARD. THIS SCENARIO IS ALSO IDENTICAL TO THE 12Z ETA MODEL RUN. SIMILARLY BUT TO THE RIGHT OF THE PREVIOUS FORECAST ARE THE GFDL...NOGAPS...UKMET...AND CANADIAN MODELS. INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH...ALL OF THE MODELS AGREE ON A SHARP DECREASE IN FORWARD SPEED OR A STALL IN 60-72 HOURS...AND THEN RAPIDLY ACCELERATING ISABEL NORTH OR NORTH-NORTHWESTWARD AFTER 96 HOURS AS THE CYCLONE IS FORECAST TO GET PICKED UP BY AN APPROACHING SHORTWAVE TROUGH FROM THE WEST AND A BUILDING RIDGE TO THE EAST. HOWEVER...THERE IS STILL SOME UNCERTAINTY ON THE CURRENT STRENGTH OF THE SUBTROPICAL RIDGE TO THE NORTH OF ISABEL...SO IT IS PRUDENT TO WAIT UNTIL ALL OF THE NOAA GULFSTREAM-IV DROPSONDE DATA MAKE IT INTO THE 14/00Z MODELS. THE OFFICIAL FORECAST TRACK IS JUST AN UPDATE OF THE PREVIOUS TRACK THROUGH 96 HOURS...WITH A LITTLE MORE NORTHWARD ACCELERATION INDICATED AT 120 HOURS AS A COURSE OF LEAST REGRET. NOTE -- NONE OF THE NHC MODEL GUIDANCE HAS ISABEL OVER LAND BY 120 HOURS.

WHILE SOME SLIGHT STRENGTHENING IS POSSIBLE IN THE NEXT 12 HOURS... THERE IS NO WAY TO REALLY TIME THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANOTHER EYEWALL REPLACEMENT CYCLE. IN THE LONG RUN...UPPER-LEVEL CONDITIONS ARE FORECAST TO REMAIN FAVORABLE FOR AT LEAST THE NEXT 48-72 HOURS... WITH THE HURRICANE ALSO MOVING OVER WARMER WATER. THEREFORE...A STEADY INTENSITY OR ONLY VERY SLOW WEAKENING IS EXPECTED FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS. BY 120 HOURS...ISABEL MAY BEGIN TO EXPERIENCING UPPER-LEVEL SOUTH TO SOUTHWESTERLY SHEAR...WHICH SHOULD BRING ABOUT MORE RAPID WEAKENING. HOWEVER...ISABEL IS STILL EXPECTED TO REMAIN A MAJOR HURRICANE THOUGHOUT THE FORECAST PERIOD.

FORECASTER STEWART

FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS

INITIAL 13/2100Z 22.6N 62.6W 140 KT
12HR VT 14/0600Z 23.0N 64.2W 140 KT
24HR VT 14/1800Z 23.7N 66.2W 140 KT
36HR VT 15/0600Z 24.4N 68.0W 135 KT
48HR VT 15/1800Z 25.2N 69.4W 135 KT
72HR VT 16/1800Z 26.5N 71.5W 130 KT
96HR VT 17/1800Z 29.5N 73.0W 125 KT
120HR VT 18/1800Z 33.5N 75.0W 105 KT
0 likes   

Josephine96

#7 Postby Josephine96 » Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:57 pm

I wasn't saying anything Deena.. I think I made that post before you made yours,.. I'm sorry if I made it sound like I was making a big deal..
0 likes   

Deenac813
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:16 pm
Location: Hollywood, Florida

#8 Postby Deenac813 » Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:58 pm

Josephine96 wrote:I wasn't saying anything Deena.. I think I made that post before you made yours,.. I'm sorry if I made it sound like I was making a big deal..



Sorry.. Tensions are high here with Isabel out there & if I jumped at your post I apologize :oops:
0 likes   

Josephine96

#9 Postby Josephine96 » Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:03 pm

Deena.. It's ok.. and I can understand why tensions are high.. in fact for me they may get a little higher.. Cause since she's now moving WNW.. that does probably take out South Florida but it increases the potential threat to Central or North...

Oh the joys of living in Florida in September lol
0 likes   

Deenac813
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:16 pm
Location: Hollywood, Florida

#10 Postby Deenac813 » Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:05 pm

Josephine96 wrote:Deena.. It's ok.. and I can understand why tensions are high.. in fact for me they may get a little higher.. Cause since she's now moving WNW.. that does probably take out South Florida but it increases the potential threat to Central or North...


If a major storm hits North or Central Florida the State of Florida would have a MAJOR insurance crisis.. Insurance prices are already out of control down here & the insurers all want to insure in North/Central Florida due to less exposure to hurricanes! can you imagine?
0 likes   

john186292
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:47 pm

insurance

#11 Postby john186292 » Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:20 pm

insurance is a major scandal...we ought to nationalize it all. Soc. Security is an example of dependable, nationalized insurance, for pensions.Of course, it should have been made fatter...and from General Funds as in neew zealand, not a limited special fund. Private ins. just is too unstable...they go out of business, they often refuse to insure flood at all, they only ins those rich eno to afford sky hi rates, they ...after andrew, ...just refused to pay many legit claims. What rot! why put up with the rats???
Put the rats out of business...nationalize.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Killjoy12, Ulf and 34 guests