GFDL Question...runs conflict

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Post Reply
Message
Author
Anonymous

GFDL Question...runs conflict

#1 Postby Anonymous » Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:44 am

If you look at the GFDL 91L forecast 84 hours out, you get a Hurricane approaching Panama City, Fla but no hurricane in the Carribbean http://bricker.met.psu.edu/trop-cgi/gfd ... hour=084hr . If you look at the GFDL for 84 hours out on 93L, you find a cane South of Cuba but nothing near Panama City http://bricker.met.psu.edu/trop-cgi/gfd ... hour=084hr . Why is this??
0 likes   
Top
Derek Ortt

#2 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:53 am

it has to do with domain resolution. the resolution of the inner domain is 5-15km while the outer one is about 100km
0 likes   
Top
MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:
Contact MWatkins

#3 Postby MWatkins » Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am

91L was the 6Z version of the model...the link you posted for 93L was the 00Z from last night.

So they are two different runs with 2 different verify times for 84 hours. That's probably the difference...

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
Top
Anonymous

#4 Postby Anonymous » Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:56 am

So are these runs even close to accurate? 91L model would definitely affect the overall atmosphere thus affect 93L's path/strength and vice versa-correct? I mean you cut out the other storm then you are not getting a true picture of the atmosphere if both come true.
0 likes   
Top
Anonymous

#5 Postby Anonymous » Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:57 am

MWatkins wrote:91L was the 6Z version of the model...the link you posted for 93L was the 00Z from last night.

So they are two different runs with 2 different verify times for 84 hours. That's probably the difference...

MW


Oops, I didnt notice that, thanx
0 likes   
Top
Derek Ortt

#6 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:59 am

all models like this have a higher resolution inner domain. The outer environment has a coarser resolution; thus, it can mis small scale features such as a TC
0 likes   
Top
MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:
Contact MWatkins

#7 Postby MWatkins » Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:03 am

Jekyhe32210 wrote:
MWatkins wrote:91L was the 6Z version of the model...the link you posted for 93L was the 00Z from last night.

So they are two different runs with 2 different verify times for 84 hours. That's probably the difference...

MW


Oops, I didnt notice that, thanx


No prob...last year I posted a link to the ETA model and called it the GFS...it happens...

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
Top
rbaker

#8 Postby rbaker » Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:16 am

I thought it was showing two different runs on two different systems. 91L is the one in the gom.and 93L is the one that is coming into the e caribbean, which by the way looking at surfarce reports and ramasis sat picture clearly shows a spin, and excellent banding, this could already be Bonnie.
0 likes   
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests