TS Irene=Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
problem is is that irene is a shallow system and doesn't have cold cloud tops to see a circ or motion.so everyone assumes she is disorganized but the LLC is still in good shape(probably) and the visibles in the morning will show a better heading and what organizational state she is in.
Being in NC i hope she fizzes as alot of longer range talk and models is for a SC/NC threat
Being in NC i hope she fizzes as alot of longer range talk and models is for a SC/NC threat
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 23010
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Sanibel wrote:You could see the surface spiral bands curving into the center all day on visible.
The convection is curved and had a reflection of the LLC displaced by shear.
No way an open wave.
Actually, you could not see surface spiral bands curving into any center all day. You saw the images I posted, there was no evidence of anything at the surface. QuickSCAT confirms that it's an open wave. The center was in the process of dissipating last evening.
There is real data that supports my professional opinion. Take a look at this quickscat image only 4 hours old. It clearly shows an open wave with max uncontatminated winds of 20-25 kts.
http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/sto ... 0_09ds.png
There seems to be quite a bit of wishful thinking here in this thread. I can understand that everyone is excited that there COULD be an east coast TS/hurricane threat in 6-7 days. But don't let your enthusiasm cloud your judgement. Look at the facts. It's obvious I'm just wasting my time here. Enjoy your Cat 5 tomorrow.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
ivanhater wrote:wxman57 wrote:Hurricanehink wrote:The storm is getting more organized, no doubt. The circulation, IMO, is getting embedded in the convection, and though it is small, it is almost infinitely better than yesterday. The question is, where and how strong? Carolinas might get this one as stronger than many might think.
(This is just the opinion of the poster, do not take it for anything official, consult NHC for anything official)
No offense, but I'm curious as to what you are looking at that shows that there even IS a low-level circulation? I stared at high-res visible McIdas imagery all day and could detect no sign of an LLC. And it would be nearly impossible to detect an LLC at night with this type of system. As for the convection, there are only 2 thunderstorms in the entire depression as of now. So since the existence of a circulation is in question, and there is no convection, I could not conclude without a doubt that it is getting better organized. In my professional opinion, Irene has been a wave for nearly 24 hours with no well-defined LLC. That conclusion is suppored by all the available data, including both a 0936 and 2200Z quickscat pass:
http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/sto ... 0_09ds.png
http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/sto ... 0_09as.png
Therfore, without an LLC and with extremely limited convection, all I can conclude is that we have a strong tropical wave there which needs to be monitored closely for potential development in a day or two.
Again, I know that the part about having no doubt that it is getting better organized was just your opinion, and you're certainly entitled to an opinion. I was just wondering what facts your opinion was based upon.
well you didnt think it was moving west yesterday evening when it clearly was.
No offense Ivan....
wxman IMO is about as good as it gets around here...
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 23010
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
ncdowneast wrote:problem is is that irene is a shallow system and doesn't have cold cloud tops to see a circ or motion.so everyone assumes she is disorganized but the LLC is still in good shape(probably) and the visibles in the morning will show a better heading and what organizational state she is in.
Being in NC i hope she fizzes as alot of longer range talk and models is for a SC/NC threat
Ok, one last post. You DO NOT see a circulation in cold cloud tops. Using IR imagery, you ignore the cold, bright cloud tops and look for the very low clouds that are almost the same color as the ocean surface. With a weak system like Irene, seeing an LLC at night would be nearly impossible. Use the data available - QuickSCAT. It clearly shows no LLC.
http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/sto ... 0_09ds.png
Ok, that's it, I'm out of here.
0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
wxman57 wrote:ncdowneast wrote:problem is is that irene is a shallow system and doesn't have cold cloud tops to see a circ or motion.so everyone assumes she is disorganized but the LLC is still in good shape(probably) and the visibles in the morning will show a better heading and what organizational state she is in.
Being in NC i hope she fizzes as alot of longer range talk and models is for a SC/NC threat
Ok, one last post. You DO NOT see a circulation in cold cloud tops. Using IR imagery, you ignore the cold, bright cloud tops and look for the very low clouds that are almost the same color as the ocean surface. With a weak system like Irene, seeing an LLC at night would be nearly impossible. Use the data available - QuickSCAT. It clearly shows no LLC.
http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/sto ... 0_09ds.png
Ok, that's it, I'm out of here.
Hey WX, posting on Dan's board wasnt this bad huh??

0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
ivanhater wrote:well im pointing out he was wrong yesterday and pros can be wrong, there is nothing wrong with being wrong, were all human
There is nothing wrong with being "human"...
What is now happening is that the "amateurs" at this site, and I consider myself in that category, are now arguing with the pros when the obvious is staring you in the face.
I stated earlier that I miss the "old days"
50+ pages for something that has not even began to threaten the US is absurd.... IMO...
Scott
0 likes
- BensonTCwatcher
- Category 5
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
- Location: Southport NC
Based on the QS data here's the hires http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/dataimages21/cur_hires/zooms/WMBas99.png it is an open wave. Also, the last visibles confirm it. Most folks are looking at the MLC. Even on the short wave IR, it looks dubiuos. The mid level circualtion was de-coupled. In fact, I don't think it was ever coupled.
Having said that, we saw this opening in the circ. before and yet the system is still here. I think we are at a decision point. if the opens much more it's diminishing IMHO
Having said that, we saw this opening in the circ. before and yet the system is still here. I think we are at a decision point. if the opens much more it's diminishing IMHO
0 likes
ivanhater wrote:personally i dont care, i will question anyone who i may think is wrong, call me independent, but i think its a good thing to question people, it only makes us better
Its ok to question people on there opinions as long as you have facts to back them up. Both you guys had facts so really should be no hard feelings but rather just a disagreement.
Personally, (and yes I did look for the low level clouds that look like the ocean

0 likes
- Ivanhater
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 11162
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
- Location: Pensacola
ROCK wrote:ivanhater wrote:personally i dont care, i will question anyone who i may think is wrong, call me independent, but i think its a good thing to question people, it only makes us better
Its ok to question people on there opinions as long as you have facts to back them up. Both you guys had facts so really should be no hard feelings but rather just a disagreement.
Personally, (and yes I did look for the low level clouds that look like the ocean) IMO there is some sort of weak LLC associated with Irene but not as strong as yesterday. Really looking ragged tonight with loss of convection.
i agree
0 likes
- Wnghs2007
- Category 5
- Posts: 6836
- Age: 36
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
- Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
- Contact:
Personally, Tropical Wave Irene looks like total junk tonight, as wxman57 has stated the quickscat shows that there is no closed low level circulation.
Which would generally mean it would go in the general direction in which tropical waves go, westward. And even if it did have a LLC it is so weak that it would have to follow the lower level flow which with maps that have been posted is towards the west.
However lets watch this down the road as it could re develop. But Im sure tomorrow morning I am going to be eating my words so much its not funny. As I tend to jynx things to happen.
So if Im wrong I would like some BBQ Crow Sandwhich with some bacon and cheese and some turkey. Go light on the Mayo with a fry and a Large Coke Zero.
Which would generally mean it would go in the general direction in which tropical waves go, westward. And even if it did have a LLC it is so weak that it would have to follow the lower level flow which with maps that have been posted is towards the west.
However lets watch this down the road as it could re develop. But Im sure tomorrow morning I am going to be eating my words so much its not funny. As I tend to jynx things to happen.
So if Im wrong I would like some BBQ Crow Sandwhich with some bacon and cheese and some turkey. Go light on the Mayo with a fry and a Large Coke Zero.

0 likes
deltadog03 wrote:ok, could someone answer my question please??? why do the models still want to start moving this think WNW like yesterday??? any thoughts...
I won't discourage you from trying to figure that out as you just might learn something in the process (as you might be in better touch with the data if you scour it trying to figure out what the models are seeing).
However, I will say that there is not much wrong with 'blackboxing' the problem, i.e. accepting that it exists without explanation and then continuing your work with that bias accounted for. You usually can't carry that kind of thinking too far into the future, but in the shorter terms it does help.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: facemane, Google Adsense [Bot], Hurricaneman, Ian2401, Keldeo1997, LAF92, LarryWx, Pelicane, SFLcane, skillz305 and 65 guests