Invest 98L in Western Atlantic

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145888
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 98L Near Bahamas

#121 Postby cycloneye » Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:53 pm

WHXX01 KWBC 281814
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1814 UTC SAT JUL 28 2007

DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.

ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL982007) 20070728 1800 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS. .. ...36 HRS...
070728 1800 070729 0600 070729 1800 070730 0600

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 25.4N 73.7W 26.8N 73.2W 28.6N 72.0W 30.4N 70.7W
BAMD 25.4N 73.7W 26.7N 72.8W 28.5N 71.7W 30.6N 70.2W
BAMM 25.4N 73.7W 26.7N 73.1W 28.6N 71.9W 30.4N 70.5W
LBAR 25.4N 73.7W 26.2N 72.9W 27.8N 72.3W 29.8N 71.7W
SHIP 20KTS 25KTS 32KTS 40KTS
DSHP 20KTS 25KTS 32KTS 40KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS. .. ..120 HRS...
070730 1800 070731 1800 070801 1800 070802 1800

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 32.2N 69.2W 36.1N 65.9W 39.6N 62.2W 41.1N 58.1W
BAMD 32.6N 68.0W 37.4N 62.8W 42.4N 55.6W 47.1N 37.4W
BAMM 32.3N 68.7W 36.6N 64.4W 40.8N 58.9W 41.9N 47.4W
LBAR 32.0N 70.9W 36.8N 67.8W 40.7N 60.0W 41.8N 48.1W
SHIP 49KTS 60KTS 58KTS 44KTS
DSHP 49KTS 60KTS 58KTS 44KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 25.4N LONCUR = 73.7W DIRCUR = 30DEG SPDCUR = 3KT
LATM12 = 25.4N LONM12 = 73.8W DIRM12 = 138DEG SPDM12 = 1KT
LATM24 = 25.4N LONM24 = 73.8W
WNDCUR = 20KT RMAXWD = 30NM WNDM12 = 20KT
CENPRS = 1012MB OUTPRS = 1014MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = D
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM

$$
0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

#122 Postby xironman » Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:54 pm

Sure, but I know that satellite images can be misleading, and since there are few surface observation points out there, what are the proper caveats for interpreting these images? In this case the image seems to show a good indication of something going on at that point that would be of interest.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#123 Postby RL3AO » Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:57 pm

That is what QuikScat does. It shows you if there is a surface low and how strong the winds are. Very good tool.
0 likes   

DrewFL

Re: Invest 98L Near Bahamas

#124 Postby DrewFL » Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:59 pm

12Z GFDL and HWRF are also available. http://moe.met.fsu.edu/tcgengifs/
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Re: Invest 98L Near Bahamas

#125 Postby dixiebreeze » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:08 pm

0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

#126 Postby xironman » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:13 pm

Thanks RL3AO,
Then I guess there would be a real surface low. The GDFL looks interesting for Bermuda anyways. Any chance the weather could be drawn towards OBX by the approaching troughs?
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Invest 98L Near Bahamas

#127 Postby Thunder44 » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:22 pm

It's probably overdone, but the 12z CMC looks like develops this system into a hurricane by 72hrs and takes into the Canadian Maritimes by 96hrs:

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/cmctc2.c ... =Animation
0 likes   

Berwick Bay

Re: Invest 98L Near Bahamas

#128 Postby Berwick Bay » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:24 pm

cpdaman said
well i can't beleive how far that SE trough is digging i mean it's getting all the way down to cuba

and it is not going anywhere anytime soon
___________________________________________________
You're right CP. I can't remember the last time that I saw a trough in July dig down this deep. Those storms south of Fl will soon be south of central Cuba if this keeps up.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: Convection East of Bahamas

#129 Postby miamicanes177 » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:28 pm

wxman57 wrote:
I'm surprised they called this an invest, but it could be another test. Before anyone charges me with committing a federal crime by suggesting that the NHC doesn't REALLY think this is significant enough for an invest but they want to run more tests, just consider that such tests are good. They verify that everything works properly. Tests help protect the public. I'm not "accusing" them of doing anything bad. They're doing their job, working to protect the public. One clue is that the last discussion said absolutely nothing about this bob. Just keep in mind that they did make some major software changes in June with respect to the ingestion of model data (simplified description). The only way to really be sure that the software changes work well with real invest headers is to have an invest and test it. A test invest won't do, they need the real thing. So, it could be a test. No harm done, as these invests aren't broadcast to the public. You guys know about them because you're all hurricane nuts and you seek them out.

So if it's another test, that's good. It shows the NHC is preparing for the heart of the season and they want to make sure all is working properly. Better to find out the software upgrades don't work right now, when any threat is minimal, than later when a significant threat develops. Let's see what they say in the next outlook discussion. I suspect they'll mention the area but say development is unlikely.
I'm going to have to disagree with you on this subject again because I feel this is not a test by the NHC. I think this is the real thing. I believe this is indeed an invest and NHC have therefore called it 98L. It would seem quite odd if nearly all of the invests would simply be tests.
0 likes   

User avatar
Meso
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1609
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: South Africa
Contact:

#130 Postby Meso » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:29 pm

The GFDL also shows it reaching hurricane intensity as well.
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

Re: Convection East of Bahamas

#131 Postby storms in NC » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:39 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
I'm surprised they called this an invest, but it could be another test. Before anyone charges me with committing a federal crime by suggesting that the NHC doesn't REALLY think this is significant enough for an invest but they want to run more tests, just consider that such tests are good. They verify that everything works properly. Tests help protect the public. I'm not "accusing" them of doing anything bad. They're doing their job, working to protect the public. One clue is that the last discussion said absolutely nothing about this bob. Just keep in mind that they did make some major software changes in June with respect to the ingestion of model data (simplified description). The only way to really be sure that the software changes work well with real invest headers is to have an invest and test it. A test invest won't do, they need the real thing. So, it could be a test. No harm done, as these invests aren't broadcast to the public. You guys know about them because you're all hurricane nuts and you seek them out.

So if it's another test, that's good. It shows the NHC is preparing for the heart of the season and they want to make sure all is working properly. Better to find out the software upgrades don't work right now, when any threat is minimal, than later when a significant threat develops. Let's see what they say in the next outlook discussion. I suspect they'll mention the area but say development is unlikely.
I'm going to have to disagree with you on this subject again because I feel this is not a test by the NHC. I think this is the real thing. I believe this is indeed an invest and NHC have therefore called it 98L. It would seem quite odd if nearly all of the invests would simply be tests.


But he is a PRO and they are never wrong. Sorry I don't like those who try and put others down just cause they have something behind their name. He maybe a good Met but I think he can be understanding here not everyone went to Met school.

There is a quite a few on here that could out do him in a heart beat.

As far as I can see about this invest Or test LOL it is being pulled by the ULL. Wait and see if it can break away from it.

Sorry if I stepped out of line.

Deb
0 likes   

User avatar
jrod
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:22 pm
Location: jacksonville, fl

#132 Postby jrod » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:52 pm

It looks unimpressive to me right now. I doubt this is a test by the NHC and because many computer models are developing and QuikSCAT should a possible closed low they are watching it. Im going to guess the NHC on their next update will write development if any should be slow to occur.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2812
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

Re: Invest 98L Near Bahamas

#133 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:57 pm

If I had to bet right now; I'd say it will only be a threat to Nova Scotia or especially Newfoundland, or might even be a fish. Honestly even if it does develop, I'm not even that concerned about it sitting here in SW New Brunswick, little own for Cape Hatteras or New England.

I'd like to hear other peoples thought on this system’s possible track.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#134 Postby HURAKAN » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:57 pm

28/1745 UTC 25.2N 73.7W TOO WEAK 98L -- Atlantic Ocean
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#135 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:57 pm

I'm now on the train with the models. I do think we will get Chantal out of this. I don't agree with the model that blows it all the way to about 945 mb south of Greenland though (a Category 3 hurricane in the subarctic Atlantic???)
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

Re:

#136 Postby Cyclone1 » Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:00 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:I'm now on the train with the models. I do think we will get Chantal out of this. I don't agree with the model that blows it all the way to about 945 mb south of Greenland though (a Category 3 hurricane in the subarctic Atlantic???)


LOL, extratropical, I'm sure.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2812
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

Re:

#137 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:02 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:I'm now on the train with the models. I do think we will get Chantal out of this. I don't agree with the model that blows it all the way to about 945 mb south of Greenland though (a Category 3 hurricane in the subarctic Atlantic???)


I tend to agree. I seriously doubt that can happened unless a storm obtained that strength LONG before it reached Sub artic seas, even then it would be a long shot.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#138 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:06 pm

Models:

CMC - develops, strengthens to a Cat 2-3

GFDL - develops, strengthens to a Cat 1

GFS - develops a TS then absorbs by a new system

HWRF - fails to develop

NOGAPS - absorbs by a new system which strengthens

UKM - develops but only becomes a TS
0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

#139 Postby xironman » Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:07 pm

There must be something going on down there with all the different wind directions

ID T1 TIME LAT LON DIST HDG WDIR WSPD GST WVHT DPD APD MWD PRES PTDY ATMP WTMP
(GMT) nm °T °T kts kts ft sec sec °T in in °F °F
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHIP S 1800 25.00 -75.50 190 271 250 8.9 - 3.3 7.0 - - 29.94 -0.03 86.0 84.2
SHIP S 1800 25.90 -75.60 202 286 330 9.9 - 1.6 1.0 - - 29.97 - 85.6 81.0
SHIP S 1800 21.40 -70.20 238 155 150 13.0 - 4.9 2.0 - - 30.00 -0.04 88.0 -
SHIP S 1800 26.70 -67.80 249 65 180 11.1 - - - - - 29.88
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

#140 Postby Cyclone1 » Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:08 pm

Well, 4 outta 6 ain't bad.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jonny, redingtonbeach and 39 guests