xtrap is just extrapolated current motion.storms in NC wrote:how good is the XTRP I am going to say not good?
Its not a model.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
jason0509 wrote:Any chance Irene could affect Canada?
sponger wrote:I dont know about that. Data is showing the ridge intact. We are expecting the ridge to erode but that is different than if it IS eroding. That combined with a slower forward speed Later in forcast) means a fish call may be premature.
dwg71 wrote:For all of those who didnt buy into my fish call from beginning I will let you off the hook, and not gloat.
Climo cannot be thrown out the window. 95% or more of the storms that take that track end up out to sea. Models got into land a few times, but NHC never had their forecast path going inland.
On to 96L...
btw its a fish too.imo
dwg71 wrote:For all of those who didnt buy into my fish call from beginning I will let you off the hook, and not gloat.
Climo cannot be thrown out the window. 95% or more of the storms that take that track end up out to sea. Models got into land a few times, but NHC never had their forecast path going inland.
On to 96L...
btw its a fish too.imo
Well I'm not sure if you've been actively making forecasts and analysis saying why it'll recurve...and if you were calling for a recurve between Bermuda and the US East Coast...then you can gloat. After reading that over..it appears quite convoluted...and I'm not sure what I was actually trying to say...moving on.Air Force Met wrote:I won't gloat either...even though someone a while back said "so...is climo going to protect us mr pro-met?".
And to that I answer...YES!![]()
There is a reason no storm (in the position Irene was at the time) has ever made it to landfall on the CONUS.
Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, cycloneye, fllawyer, Heretoserve, IsabelaWeather, lolitx, MetroMike, Stratton23, tolakram, wileytheartist and 70 guests