
Tropical Depression #5,Analysis,Sat Pics,Models Thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- SWFLA_CANE
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:41 pm
- Location: Naples, Florida
- johngaltfla
- Category 5
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Sarasota County, FL
- Contact:
Brent wrote:johngaltfla wrote:I would say we have a tropical storm. NRL has just renamed it 05L_NONAME...
That means it's a TD. If it changes to 05L_ERNESTO then that will mean it's a storm.
Thanks...that's right; it's been a while, I thought they were updating it now and that the winds were upgraded.
My bad.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Bailey1777 wrote:AFM,
What are your thoughts on #5 right now and what do you see for the future?
It has to survive the shear first....which it should do. It has about a 75% chance of doing that. Then, all bets are off. The ridge pattern is evolving. I think everywhere east of NOLA is safe...but it is too early to say. I also think the ridge will be weak enough to allow for a CONUS landfall. So basically, LA/TX. If this storm wasn't sitting at 13N...say it was at 16N or 17N...then Al/MS...WFL would possibly be in play....depending on the ridge pattern.
Remember...upper lows can form (and this is their year) and are not well predicted by the models. You can get one form and stick somewhere and it could drive a stronger...more verticle storm more to the north.
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 5:52 pm
- Contact:
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
- Cape Verde
- Category 2
- Posts: 564
- Age: 70
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:53 pm
- Location: Houston area
This is the kind of storm that S2K thrives on. Differing models, a long ways out, much uncertainty.
It's really during these early periods where I learn the most about forecasting and tropical systems. Chris blew my mind by being stripped naked by the sheer.
I don't contribute much to the forum in the way of expertise. I'm more likely to ask a question than offer an opinion. But this storm definitely has my attention. Any storm with a potential model forecast to shoot the Yucatan into the Gulf always will.
It's really during these early periods where I learn the most about forecasting and tropical systems. Chris blew my mind by being stripped naked by the sheer.
I don't contribute much to the forum in the way of expertise. I'm more likely to ask a question than offer an opinion. But this storm definitely has my attention. Any storm with a potential model forecast to shoot the Yucatan into the Gulf always will.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
Extremeweatherguy wrote:I wouldn't trust a model that did not initialize the system in the 0000 frame. If it doesn't show the cyclone now, then it is likely it is having problems with it down the road.ronjon wrote:If you can believe any model right now - the GFS looks like it actually stalls the system in the southern GOM in the 6-7 day time frame and then slowly meanders it north-northeast into the central gulf cost. It doesn't develop the cyclone so I don't know how valid the simulation is. It looks like a trough and cut-off low develops near memphis and keeps general troughiness over the deep south during this period. The 500 mb ridge is broad and flat over the GOM so it might be reasonable for this storm to really slow down as steering currents weaken in the 6-7 day time frame.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _138.shtml
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _162.shtml
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _192.shtml
Yeah I realize it doesn't initialize the storm but it keeps some vorticity where the storm is going. I think my main point here is the evolution of the upper air pattern in that it is hinting at a weakness along the central gulf coast which may be the reason we're seeing the model runs shifting to the north.
0 likes
- all_we_know_is_FALLING
- Category 1
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 3:06 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...
- Contact:
Hmm. The shear is confusing me. Some people say that there isn't a lot and others say there is a substantial amount.
On the Tropical Update on TWC, Jim said that was some shear that could possibly blow the thunderstorms away. He also said that the shear was moving westward so it didn't seem like it would make a HUGE impact on the TD.. or at least not destroy it completely.
Thoughts?
On the Tropical Update on TWC, Jim said that was some shear that could possibly blow the thunderstorms away. He also said that the shear was moving westward so it didn't seem like it would make a HUGE impact on the TD.. or at least not destroy it completely.
Thoughts?
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 23006
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Air Force Met wrote:Just did a comparison of the 500mb ridge from the GFS...using last nights 00z run and today's 18z run.
The slide to the east continues. Whereas it looked last night like a monster ridge would be set up over the GOM and the steering would be STX or most probably MX...now the GFS is coming around (as it always overplays these ridges in these situations) and sliding it eastward more. The ridge is still anchored over FL. I never bought the ridge over the GoM like it was dipicted last night in the 00z run at 168 hours...that's just rare for the summer.
Old 29/18Z
New 29/18Z
Old 30/12Z
New 30/12Z
That's pretty much what the ECMWf has been forecasting, AFM. Greater risk to Texas and possibly LA. But with the high over Florida, I dont' expect the storm to move in that direction.
0 likes
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
ronjon wrote:Extremeweatherguy wrote:I wouldn't trust a model that did not initialize the system in the 0000 frame. If it doesn't show the cyclone now, then it is likely it is having problems with it down the road.ronjon wrote:If you can believe any model right now - the GFS looks like it actually stalls the system in the southern GOM in the 6-7 day time frame and then slowly meanders it north-northeast into the central gulf cost. It doesn't develop the cyclone so I don't know how valid the simulation is. It looks like a trough and cut-off low develops near memphis and keeps general troughiness over the deep south during this period. The 500 mb ridge is broad and flat over the GOM so it might be reasonable for this storm to really slow down as steering currents weaken in the 6-7 day time frame.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _138.shtml
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _162.shtml
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _192.shtml
Yeah I realize it doesn't initialize the storm but it keeps some vorticity where the storm is going. I think my main point here is the evolution of the upper air pattern in that it is hinting at a weakness along the central gulf coast which may be the reason we're seeing the model runs shifting to the north.
I have made comments about what your talking about here.
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88679
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:05 pm
I'm not so sure this will even may it though the next few days. Looking at the shear ahead of it. I know this TUTT(ULL) is suppose to move out to the west, but I won't believe it till I actually see start pulling out.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/watl/loop-wv.html
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/watl/loop-wv.html
Last edited by tailgater on Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- skysummit
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5305
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Ponchatoula, LA
- Contact:
wxman57 wrote:Air Force Met wrote:Just did a comparison of the 500mb ridge from the GFS...using last nights 00z run and today's 18z run.
The slide to the east continues. Whereas it looked last night like a monster ridge would be set up over the GOM and the steering would be STX or most probably MX...now the GFS is coming around (as it always overplays these ridges in these situations) and sliding it eastward more. The ridge is still anchored over FL. I never bought the ridge over the GoM like it was dipicted last night in the 00z run at 168 hours...that's just rare for the summer.
Old 29/18Z
New 29/18Z
Old 30/12Z
New 30/12Z
That's pretty much what the ECMWf has been forecasting, AFM. Greater risk to Texas and possibly LA. But with the high over Florida, I dont' expect the storm to move in that direction.
Could this be why the latest tropical models shifted north a bit?
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 23006
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
skysummit wrote:Could this be why the latest tropical models shifted north a bit?
Just beware what model you're looking at. Ignore the BAM models in this dynamic situation. They won't see the changing pattern. The dynamic models show a ridge over Florida, but a tad more east than yesterday. Track toward Texas looks like a good bet, but LA is not out of the woods by any means. Anywhere from northern Mexico to Mobile Bay is a possibility.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dl20415 and 69 guests