tarheelprogrammer wrote:From completely active to completely empty of activity in one run lol

hopefully the models continuing staying quiet. Just odd for it to show that many TCs and then none even for that far out in that range. At least from what I have seen of the models.
My take on the longer range GFS is that it may be better "sniffing out" developing systems, but i'd rather the model just as quickly drop the bad potatoe if a following run simply cannot support the metrix of data to maintain an organized low. At such a long range, I'm looking at whatever trend and possibly increased run after run consistancy toward maintaining tropical low integrity, as an indicator or trend of whats to come. What has annoyed me in the past is when the GFS might maintain significant run after run T.S. consistancy, right up to a relative nearer range (such as 96 to 120 hours), and then suddenly drop the system altogether. Obviously atmospheric conditions detected must have caused its forecasts to change, but it was becoming so poor at detecting those changes while approaching its prior historical accurate short to mid range time frames. Hopefully much of that will have been ironed out through system upgrades... we'll see.
Kind of funny but I almost equate long term model watching with trying to track the elusive Florida tornado. From radar signiture to above ground sighting, jog... weeve..., back up and nothing, then debris and twisted trees some couple miles upstream, all before maybe one or two further rare sightings of our typically smaller and eratic funnel - then poof! Luckily, most of the time few here will actually witness seeing the funnel, but the weather's bad enough and the warning's have been issued. Seeing is certainly beleiving though and with increased sightings come the greater perception of risk. In a way, watching longer range models feels oddly similar. If a model doesnt show a storm, it doesnt mean there wont be one but a model run suddently popping a tropical storm forming raises one's eyebrow. Finally, with greater consistancy comes the obvious increase risk of development. Of course..... then there's the CMC, but thats an altogether different topic LOL.