CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Spacecoast
- Category 2
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:03 pm
CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
Haven't seen this posted anywhere else....
sorted by probability of Hurricane impacts:
sorted by probability of Major Hurricane impacts:
1950-2021 Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
1950-2021 Major Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
sorted by probability of Hurricane impacts:
sorted by probability of Major Hurricane impacts:
1950-2021 Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
1950-2021 Major Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
Last edited by Spacecoast on Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes
- Blown Away
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9861
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
Spacecoast wrote:Haven't seen this posted anywhere else....
sorted by probability of Hurricane impacts:
https://i.ibb.co/RbqtPW7/impact.jpg
sorted by probability of Major Hurricane impacts:
https://i.ibb.co/Lk2PRF3/MHimpact.jpg
1950-2021 Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
https://i.ibb.co/wNRbdtF/chrta.jpg
1950-2021 Major Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
https://i.ibb.co/NxnQd5w/chrt.jpg
Great info, can you send the links to this info?
0 likes
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05...
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…
- skyline385
- Category 5
- Posts: 2444
- Age: 33
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
- Location: Palm Beach County FL
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
Blown Away wrote:Spacecoast wrote:Haven't seen this posted anywhere else....
sorted by probability of Hurricane impacts:
https://i.ibb.co/RbqtPW7/impact.jpg
sorted by probability of Major Hurricane impacts:
https://i.ibb.co/Lk2PRF3/MHimpact.jpg
1950-2021 Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
https://i.ibb.co/wNRbdtF/chrta.jpg
1950-2021 Major Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
https://i.ibb.co/NxnQd5w/chrt.jpg
Great info, can you send the links to this info?
Its on CSU's page
https://tropical.colostate.edu/TC_impact.html
0 likes
- captainbarbossa19
- Category 5
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:09 pm
- Location: Starkville, MS
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
skyline385 wrote:Blown Away wrote:Spacecoast wrote:Haven't seen this posted anywhere else....
sorted by probability of Hurricane impacts:
https://i.ibb.co/RbqtPW7/impact.jpg
sorted by probability of Major Hurricane impacts:
https://i.ibb.co/Lk2PRF3/MHimpact.jpg
1950-2021 Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
https://i.ibb.co/wNRbdtF/chrta.jpg
1950-2021 Major Hurricane impacts for US / Florida:
https://i.ibb.co/NxnQd5w/chrt.jpg
Great info, can you send the links to this info?
Its on CSU's page
https://tropical.colostate.edu/TC_impact.html
Wow! I was looking through the data, and Texas has a 28% chance of a major hurricane this year. The normal chance is 16%. That is not good.
0 likes
- skyline385
- Category 5
- Posts: 2444
- Age: 33
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
- Location: Palm Beach County FL
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
captainbarbossa19 wrote:skyline385 wrote:Blown Away wrote:
Great info, can you send the links to this info?
Its on CSU's page
https://tropical.colostate.edu/TC_impact.html
Wow! I was looking through the data, and Texas has a 28% chance of a major hurricane this year. The normal chance is 16%. That is not good.
Whats even more crazy is that FL has 49% chance for Major this year while LA is only at 26%
0 likes
- toad strangler
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 4162
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
skyline385 wrote:captainbarbossa19 wrote:
Wow! I was looking through the data, and Texas has a 28% chance of a major hurricane this year. The normal chance is 16%. That is not good.
Whats even more crazy is that FL has 49% chance for Major this year while LA is only at 26%
Florida coastline dwarfs LA. Those numbers aren’t a surprise at all.
2 likes
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
toad strangler wrote:skyline385 wrote:captainbarbossa19 wrote:
Wow! I was looking through the data, and Texas has a 28% chance of a major hurricane this year. The normal chance is 16%. That is not good.
Whats even more crazy is that FL has 49% chance for Major this year while LA is only at 26%
Florida coastline dwarfs LA. Those numbers aren’t a surprise at all.
It seems like lately the FL panhandle has taken the majority of the hits.
0 likes
- skyline385
- Category 5
- Posts: 2444
- Age: 33
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
- Location: Palm Beach County FL
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
toad strangler wrote:skyline385 wrote:captainbarbossa19 wrote:
Wow! I was looking through the data, and Texas has a 28% chance of a major hurricane this year. The normal chance is 16%. That is not good.
Whats even more crazy is that FL has 49% chance for Major this year while LA is only at 26%
Florida coastline dwarfs LA. Those numbers aren’t a surprise at all.
Florida has a bigger coastline but since 2000, LA had 5 major landfalls and FL had 6 majors. We cant also just ignore recent climo, especially the last two seasons (3 majors for LA) of the current La Nina period.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 139019
- Age: 67
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
Puerto Rico has very high numbers 64%-41%-18%. We dont need a landfall of any kind as the grid is still fragil after Maria.
1 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- InfernoFlameCat
- Category 5
- Posts: 1966
- Age: 21
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
- Location: Buford, GA
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
skyline385 wrote:captainbarbossa19 wrote:
Wow! I was looking through the data, and Texas has a 28% chance of a major hurricane this year. The normal chance is 16%. That is not good.
Whats even more crazy is that FL has 49% chance for Major this year while LA is only at 26%
49% for a major hurricane. Call me crazy but I think that’s low.
1 likes
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
skyline385 wrote:toad strangler wrote:skyline385 wrote:
Whats even more crazy is that FL has 49% chance for Major this year while LA is only at 26%
Florida coastline dwarfs LA. Those numbers aren’t a surprise at all.
Florida has a bigger coastline but since 2000, LA had 5 major landfalls and FL had 6 majors. We cant also just ignore recent climo, especially the last two seasons (3 majors for LA) of the current La Nina period.
https://i.imgur.com/lEZ9RUa.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/uUwekZr.jpg
Yes we can ignore recent climo, thats not how climatology works.You have to look at the LONG term pattern for change. Not just an uptake in landfalls over the last few years.
4 likes
- toad strangler
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 4162
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
wxman22 wrote:skyline385 wrote:toad strangler wrote:
Florida coastline dwarfs LA. Those numbers aren’t a surprise at all.
Florida has a bigger coastline but since 2000, LA had 5 major landfalls and FL had 6 majors. We cant also just ignore recent climo, especially the last two seasons (3 majors for LA) of the current La Nina period.
https://i.imgur.com/lEZ9RUa.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/uUwekZr.jpg
Yes we can ignore recent climo, thats not how climatology works.You have to look at the LONG term pattern for change. Not just an uptake in landfalls over the last few years.
Just like one can't look at May early development recently as a change in climo either. Florida is always going to have a much higher chance in charts like these because:
A. The coastline is huge
B. Much of the state is surrounded by water on 3 sides and can take a hit nearly from any direction. No place else in the CONUS has that distinction.
0 likes
- Spacecoast
- Category 2
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:03 pm
Re: CSU 2022 Probabilty of TC Impacts (climo based)
toad strangler wrote:wxman22 wrote:skyline385 wrote:
Florida has a bigger coastline but since 2000, LA had 5 major landfalls and FL had 6 majors. We cant also just ignore recent climo, especially the last two seasons (3 majors for LA) of the current La Nina period.
https://i.imgur.com/lEZ9RUa.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/uUwekZr.jpg
Yes we can ignore recent climo, thats not how climatology works.You have to look at the LONG term pattern for change. Not just an uptake in landfalls over the last few years.
Just like one can't look at May early development recently as a change in climo either. Florida is always (at least in most of our lifetimes) going to have a much higher chance in charts like these because:
A. The coastline is huge
B. Much of the state is surrounded by water on 3 sides and can take a hit nearly from any direction. No place else in the CONUS has that distinction.
"We cant also just ignore recent climo".... unless recent climo contains highly unusual outliers (such as the Florida drought of impacts 2006-2016).
Recent climo isn't ignored, it's just under-weighted using a 140 year sample size.
This is like flipping a coin 'tails' 9 time in row. It may seem like a 'tails' trend, (and likely to continue), or it may seem like 'heads' is long overdue, (return to mean). Both are wrong. The probability remains 50%.
140 years may be too large, (discounting recent trends), but 20 years may be too small a sample size. 75 years seems like a good compromise.
Comparing a smaller land mass to a larger land mass does skew the probabilities.
A bigger target generally means more historical impacts over the last 100 years, therefore a higher probability is calculated using Poisson distribution.
It's the Impact(s) per square mile for areas that should be calculated in order to compare apples - apples.
I am working on recreating this analysis using a series of non-overlapping 60nm circles, using only (more recent, & accurate) 1950-2021 data.This will eliminate the target size variable by using a standard geographical area.
4 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests