Cat 5 Monsters on record from 1886

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139167
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Cat 5 Monsters on record from 1886

#1 Postby cycloneye » Fri May 02, 2003 5:24 pm

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/satellite/s ... t5hur.html

One of them was in 1928 and when it made landfall here in Puerto Rico as a cat 5 with 160 mph maximum winds and gusts of 200 mph caused 312 deaths.

I hope that never a cat 5 comes here or to anyplace in the US coastline or around the world because catastrophical damage and losses of live will occur.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#2 Postby Stormsfury » Fri May 02, 2003 8:46 pm

Luis, if my memory serves me right, wasn't that the "San Felipe Hurricane"?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139167
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#3 Postby cycloneye » Fri May 02, 2003 8:54 pm

Yes SF San Felipe the only cat 5 that has made landfall in Puerto Rico ever.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Steve H.
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2134
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

#4 Postby Steve H. » Sat May 03, 2003 10:33 pm

Interestingly the 1928 hurricane also hit the Melbourne, FL area and was said to have created the inlet here by cutting thru the barrier islands. Though not a cat 5 at landfall it was still fairly potent and its exact strength was unknown at landfall :o
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#5 Postby Stormsfury » Sat May 03, 2003 11:54 pm

Steve H. wrote:Interestingly the 1928 hurricane also hit the Melbourne, FL area and was said to have created the inlet here by cutting thru the barrier islands. Though not a cat 5 at landfall it was still fairly potent and its exact strength was unknown at landfall :o


Yep ... I thought that the San Felipe Hurricane also hit Florida as well. It is estimated that at time of landfall (according to NHC's best track records), it was a Category 4 at landfall.
0 likes   

ColdFront77

#6 Postby ColdFront77 » Sun May 04, 2003 12:22 am

I spent some time in Melbourne to visit my brother and sister-in-law back in early March for five days. I figured that there may of been a landfalling hurricane along that portion of the Florida coast.

The Kennedy Space Center was built on Cape Caneveral, along the east central Florida coast becomes in history there have rare been landfalling hurricanes along that portion of the eastern seaboard. They are in a way, at least due for at least a weak hurricane in the near future.
0 likes   

Steve H.
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2134
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

#7 Postby Steve H. » Sun May 04, 2003 10:40 am

The east coast is overdue from Cocoa Beach south to Ft. Lauderdale. Imagine the 1928 hurricane hitting, say West Palm, NOW!! For some reason people seem to think that it can't/won't happen. I have seen pictures of destruction (back in '38 I believe) in that area when it was unpopulated. I have talked to people that believe it would never happen again like that due to improved construction :roll: . People have short memories, and recent history (outside of Andrew) has perpetuated the myth that strong storms that landfall are a thing of the past. Someday there will be a rude awakening in store for the coast :o
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

Most Storm Experts Cringe

#8 Postby Aslkahuna » Sun May 04, 2003 1:57 pm

at the thought that the 1926 Miami Beach Hurricane could ever possibly repeat as estimates are that it would make Andrew look like a walk in the Park on a Sunny Day. Unfortunately, like Earthquakes in CA hurricanes in FL are inevitable.

Steve
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#9 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun May 04, 2003 2:43 pm

Cyc,

that 1928 hurricane, I believe, was also the same one that made landfall in sfla and caused those 2,000 deaths on the shores of Lake Okeechobee.

Also, an interesting ntoe about that hurricane was there was never a 3rd US landfall. Unlike most every other hurricane that hits Florida in that manner, this particular one did not ever emerge into the GOM, which is a good thing as the 2100+ US deaths in FL and PR were more than enough
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#10 Postby Stormsfury » Sun May 04, 2003 3:02 pm

Steve H. wrote:The east coast is overdue from Cocoa Beach south to Ft. Lauderdale. Imagine the 1928 hurricane hitting, say West Palm, NOW!! For some reason people seem to think that it can't/won't happen. I have seen pictures of destruction (back in '38 I believe) in that area when it was unpopulated. I have talked to people that believe it would never happen again like that due to improved construction :roll: . People have short memories, and recent history (outside of Andrew) has perpetuated the myth that strong storms that landfall are a thing of the past. Someday there will be a rude awakening in store for the coast :o


Good post, Steve. The bottom line is this ... if it's happened before, that means it surely can happen again.
0 likes   

User avatar
isobar
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2002
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:05 am
Location: Louisville, KY

#11 Postby isobar » Sun May 04, 2003 7:08 pm

The 1938 cane listed was the famous New England Hurricane that made landfall 9/21/38 as a cat 3.

Andrew qualifies for the cat 5 club now.
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 42
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

#12 Postby pojo » Sun May 04, 2003 7:13 pm

No one has mentioned the Labor Day Hurricane of 1935, or Camille or Andrew...all of which were cat 5 monsters!
0 likes   

User avatar
isobar
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2002
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:05 am
Location: Louisville, KY

#13 Postby isobar » Sun May 04, 2003 7:18 pm

pojo - The complete list is on cycloneye's link at the top of the thread. Camille and '35 Labor Day are there, but Andrew is not.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139167
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#14 Postby cycloneye » Sun May 04, 2003 7:21 pm

Yes isobar Andrew as a cat 5 has caused some controversy because some say that the winds were not strong as a cat 5 (over 155 mph) and others say it had over 155 mph at landfall.

I think that Derek Ortt can tell his thinking about it because last year when they change the status of Andrew he voiced a great argument against classifying it as a cat 5.
Last edited by cycloneye on Sun May 04, 2003 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
isobar
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2002
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:05 am
Location: Louisville, KY

#15 Postby isobar » Sun May 04, 2003 7:53 pm

RE: Andrew's status ... I know there are many who will never accept the change without a reliable surface anemometer reading.

I thought the timing of the announcement was pretty sucky, IMO. Right at the 10th anniversary, it seemed ceremonial.
0 likes   

Steve H.
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2134
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

#16 Postby Steve H. » Sun May 04, 2003 10:01 pm

Believe me, I did not forget the 1935 hurricane. I'm in the midst of gathering more data from it again. There was at least one survivor left on Matecumbe Key last year, but he would never talk about it. I've been wanting to go down to the keys to see if I can get an interview, but haven't gotten around to it. Hope he's still with us :( I know that very few remain. Many people living on living that key were put to work on Flagler's railroad post Depression; some were WWI vets. They were living in "camps" down there and pretty much in the dark regarding news, never mind the weather. Reports did come in from off Cuba that a Depression had formed near the southern Bahamas and was moving westward. It was forecast to become a TS, but nothing more was heard about it until a ship report came from near Cuba reporting significant pressure drops. As time passed word was sent to Miami that the storm was strengthening to severe levels, and that a train needed to be sent from Miami to the Keys to evacuate however they could, as the storm took a tun to the NW. Somehow the train got delayed leaving Miami (3 hours), then finally headed down to the Keys. That delay cost most, if not all, on board their lives. The train headed into the storm. As rain and wind increased, the train began to get boggged down by wind driven sea ater beginning to encroach on the tracks. As the train pulled into Matecumbe key they ran into something they didn't expect. A storm surge of unknown height that tore the train right off the tracks and swept all those waiting or onboard into the blackness of the the night and sea. Many drowned. Others were decapitated or impaled. The survivors had some miraculous stories; one awoke in the top of a palm tree :o Eyewitness accounts talked of sustained winds over 200 miles an hours, which lasted near 55 minutes at Long Key. But all anemometers were destroyed, so accurate records were not available for winds, although pressures were recorded in some areas (down to 26.55 at Upper Matecumbe key). But the eye was small so we don't really know how low it went (8 miles). Eyewitnesses recalled seeing sparks flying in the air, later realizing that it was the wind blowing the sand particles together causing the sparks. There are some who believe the winds were closer to 250 for a while, which analysis later showed was not out of the realm of possibilities :?: Unreal! Imagine that happening again. Someday it will. A friend of mine was down there last year and said he saw the plaque on the side of US 1 in Islamorada. Uh oh.....tornadoes in KC.....later.
0 likes   

User avatar
isobar
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2002
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:05 am
Location: Louisville, KY

#17 Postby isobar » Mon May 05, 2003 1:23 am

Steve, I've also read reports that based on damage assessments, gusts to 250 were probable. My simple brain still can't fathom this storm.

Intensified from a TS to cat 5 in 39 hrs
Total diameter of storm: 40 (forty) miles
Damage path: 30 miles
Eye: 8 miles
BP: 892 mb taken at Long Key
Pressure gradient: 1" every 6 miles

Here are a couple links I've found interesting.

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_pages/labor_day/labor_article.html
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/TLH/topevents/
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/weather/hurricane/sfl-1935-hurricane.story
0 likes   

Steve H.
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2134
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

#18 Postby Steve H. » Mon May 05, 2003 7:06 am

Thanks Isobar. The more info the better.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: duilaslol, Hybridstorm_November2001, IcyTundra, jhpigott, Killjoy12, Long John and 154 guests