Can the Greek alphabet storms be retired?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Can the Greek alphabet storms be retired?
Assuming we get to greek letters, and one of them becomes a cat 5 (which I heard means being automatically retired) would it still get retired though? If so, what will replace it?
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Wow... this question keeps popping up. I'll repeat once again.
A) Storms are NOT automatically retired if they become category five. They must cause significant damage and/or casualities. A category five fish will NOT be retired.
B) The "overtime" storms will be named: "Alpha" "Beta" "Gamma" etc. No year will be tacked on the end.
C) Greek letters will NOT be retired. They don't retire depression numbers and they don't retire Greek letters. Only names that cause significant damage and/or casualities.
A) Storms are NOT automatically retired if they become category five. They must cause significant damage and/or casualities. A category five fish will NOT be retired.
B) The "overtime" storms will be named: "Alpha" "Beta" "Gamma" etc. No year will be tacked on the end.
C) Greek letters will NOT be retired. They don't retire depression numbers and they don't retire Greek letters. Only names that cause significant damage and/or casualities.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:24 am
I don't know the answer, but I think they shouldn't retire the whole letter but should give numbers to the subsequent storms with that name.
So, if Hurricane Alpha is a major hurricane, you can retire that name, but the next year we 'batted around' we'd call the storm Alpha 2. That's the way I'd do it.
I wonder if that made any sense.
So, if Hurricane Alpha is a major hurricane, you can retire that name, but the next year we 'batted around' we'd call the storm Alpha 2. That's the way I'd do it.
I wonder if that made any sense.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:24 am
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
FunkMasterB wrote:C) Greek letters will NOT be retired. They don't retire depression numbers and they don't retire Greek letters. Only names that cause significant damage and/or casualities.
Yes, but what if a Greek lettered storm causes significant damage and/or casualties? That's the question (I think).
Note that I said "names" will be retired... not letters.
Names like Andrew, Charley, and Katrina can be retired.
Letters like Alpha, Beta, and Gamma cannot be retired.
Numbers like One, Two, and Three cannot be retired.
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
senorpepr wrote:Storms are NOT automatically retired if they become category five. They must cause significant damage and/or casualities. A category five fish will NOT be retired.
Thanks for bringing that up. And here's a good example:

Hurricane Dog in 1950 lasted 48 hours as a Cat 5, second longest-lasting Cat 5 in recorded history. The name Dog came back in 1951 and was never retired.
0 likes
senorpepr wrote:FunkMasterB wrote:C) Greek letters will NOT be retired. They don't retire depression numbers and they don't retire Greek letters. Only names that cause significant damage and/or casualities.
Yes, but what if a Greek lettered storm causes significant damage and/or casualties? That's the question (I think).
Note that I said "names" will be retired... not letters.
Names like Andrew, Charley, and Katrina can be retired.
Letters like Alpha, Beta, and Gamma cannot be retired.
Numbers like One, Two, and Three cannot be retired.
Pepr I'm gonna challenge you on this one.
For the sake of argument, let's say Alpha forms in late Oct this year in the Caribbean. After striking Haiti and Dominican Rep (killing 50,000 people) it moves into the Gulf and strikes Houston/Galveston (killing another 500 people and causing damages of $100 Billion). Fast forward to 2006. We have yet another blockbuster season and reach storm #22. Do you honestly believe NHC will begin issuing advisories on Alpha? You may think so, but I don't.
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Well... your example really isn't all that good, but nice try. Dog is not a name... it's a letter and therefore couldn't be retired even if it struck land.
Ethel (1960) was category five for a short time before making landfall on the Gulf Coast. It was not retired. Ethel is one of three category fives that weren't retired.
However... using your example to drive home another point...
Back in the early 50s we used a military alphabet for naming storms. (Able, Baker, Charley) Once again... names can be retired, but letters (such as Able, Baker, and Charley [the letter, not the name]) cannot.
Case in point... Baker 1950 caused a bit of damage/casualties along Alabama and Florida. Had this been a named storm instead of a lettered storm, it would have been retired.
Easy 1950 struck Florida as a three. It also cause quite a bit of damage/casualities.
King 1950 struck Cuba as a three and caused damage/casualities.
All of the aforementioned names were used again.
Better yet... Charley 1951 [the letter, not the name] struck the Yucatan as a four. It was used again [as a letter, then a name].
Fox 1952 struck Cuba as a four. Once again, it was not retired.
Ethel (1960) was category five for a short time before making landfall on the Gulf Coast. It was not retired. Ethel is one of three category fives that weren't retired.
However... using your example to drive home another point...
Back in the early 50s we used a military alphabet for naming storms. (Able, Baker, Charley) Once again... names can be retired, but letters (such as Able, Baker, and Charley [the letter, not the name]) cannot.
Case in point... Baker 1950 caused a bit of damage/casualties along Alabama and Florida. Had this been a named storm instead of a lettered storm, it would have been retired.
Easy 1950 struck Florida as a three. It also cause quite a bit of damage/casualities.
King 1950 struck Cuba as a three and caused damage/casualities.
All of the aforementioned names were used again.
Better yet... Charley 1951 [the letter, not the name] struck the Yucatan as a four. It was used again [as a letter, then a name].
Fox 1952 struck Cuba as a four. Once again, it was not retired.
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
senorpepr wrote:Well... your example really isn't all that good, but nice try. Dog is not a name... it's a letter and therefore couldn't be retired even if it struck land.
Ethel (1960) was category five for a short time before making landfall on the Gulf Coast. It was not retired. Ethel is one of three category fives that weren't retired.
However... using your example to drive home another point...
Back in the early 50s we used a military alphabet for naming storms. (Able, Baker, Charley) Once again... names can be retired, but letters (such as Able, Baker, and Charley [the letter, not the name]) cannot.
Case in point... Baker 1950 caused a bit of damage/casualties along Alabama and Florida. Had this been a named storm instead of a lettered storm, it would have been retired.
Easy 1950 struck Florida as a three. It also cause quite a bit of damage/casualities.
King 1950 struck Cuba as a three and caused damage/casualities.
All of the aforementioned names were used again.
Better yet... Charley 1951 [the letter, not the name] struck the Yucatan as a four. It was used again [as a letter, then a name].
Fox 1952 struck Cuba as a four. Once again, it was not retired.
Wow, ya learn something new every day (or night in this instance). Thanks for the FYI Senorpepr. I had never known that.
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
sma10 wrote:Pepr I'm gonna challenge you on this one.
For the sake of argument, let's say Alpha forms in late Oct this year in the Caribbean. After striking Haiti and Dominican Rep (killing 50,000 people) it moves into the Gulf and strikes Houston/Galveston (killing another 500 people and causing damages of $100 Billion). Fast forward to 2006. We have yet another blockbuster season and reach storm #22. Do you honestly believe NHC will begin issuing advisories on Alpha? You may think so, but I don't.
Well... like I said in my last post... there was no problem reusing letters back in the early 50s each year after they caused plenty of damage. Plenty of people have died from a depression called "12". That number isn't retired. You won't see Alpha retired in the example you have above. It's just how it goes.
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
senorpepr wrote:Ethel (1960) was category five for a short time before making landfall on the Gulf Coast. It was not retired. Ethel is one of three category fives that weren't retired.
To add on...
Ethel (1960) and Cleo (1958) were both category fives without being retired.
As for the third: Edith (1971). Edith actually struck Central America as a category five. Thankfully it only killed 43 people. Although it was never used again, it was never retired.
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
senorpepr wrote:senorpepr wrote:Ethel (1960) was category five for a short time before making landfall on the Gulf Coast. It was not retired. Ethel is one of three category fives that weren't retired.
To add on...
Ethel (1960) and Cleo (1958) were both category fives without being retired.
As for the third: Edith (1971). Edith actually struck Central America as a category five. Thankfully it only killed 43 people. Although it was never used again, it was never retired.
Well sorry if this hijacks the original thread but did Ethel really reach Cat 5? I mean it would be pretty amazing to have a TS in the middle of the GOM that explodes to a Cat 5 off the mouth of the Mississippi River, but then implodes again in the last 100 miles before landfall to a TS. Would be amazing on radar to say the least.
Numerous members, including Derek Ortt, have said that Ethel didn't reach Cat 5. From what you've written, and all the historical sources out there, the consensus is that it did. What do you think? B/C if Ethel really didn't reach Cat 5 well then one of your examples would be off.
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Well... Derek's claim that Ethel was not a category five is his professional opinion. To be honest, in my professional opinion, I agree with him. I find it hard to believe. However, until the reanalysis states otherwise, it was a category five.
Here are a couple of govt websites listing Ethel as a category five:
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/satellite/s ... t5hur.html
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_page ... TLdate.dat
Here are a couple of govt websites listing Ethel as a category five:
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/satellite/s ... t5hur.html
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_page ... TLdate.dat
0 likes
Alpha
The principle that names get retired but numbers and letters don't is merely a rule about how we use words and letters, not a fact carved in stone. The NHC has not said as far as I can tell whether it would retire Alpha if it was a major storm that caused problems.
A (capital alpha) is a letter. Alpha is a word and a name. It is part of the name of the nearest star system to the Sun, Alpha Centauri.
Some alternatives for a destructive Alpha cyclone are:
Increment the name. Next year, the 22nd storm would be called Alphb.
Skip the name. Next year, the 22nd storm would be Beta.
Cycle the names. The 22nd storm this year would be Arlene; possibly Arlene 2.
Year the name. The 22nd storm this year would be Alpha 2005.
Use another alphabet. The 22nd storm next year would be Aleph.
A (capital alpha) is a letter. Alpha is a word and a name. It is part of the name of the nearest star system to the Sun, Alpha Centauri.
Some alternatives for a destructive Alpha cyclone are:
Increment the name. Next year, the 22nd storm would be called Alphb.
Skip the name. Next year, the 22nd storm would be Beta.
Cycle the names. The 22nd storm this year would be Arlene; possibly Arlene 2.
Year the name. The 22nd storm this year would be Alpha 2005.
Use another alphabet. The 22nd storm next year would be Aleph.
0 likes
- Weatherfreak14
- Category 5
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
- Location: Beaufort, SC
- Contact:
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:04 pm
- Location: Nokomis, FL
senorpepr, thanks for the fascinating info!
Question for you: who decides if a name is retired, is it NHC? Also, I wonder what their criteria for retirement is? I know it's significant damage and destruction, but you've also named a few Cat 3 storms that had this whose names were not retired. I'm just wondering how they judge what's significant, if they have some sort of benchmarks they look for.
Thanks! I know you say you've gone over this before but it was new to me and so I very much appreciate you discussing this again.
Maybe this could go in a S2K FAQ somewhere so you could just point people to it when the question pops up again.
I'm also curious: Since we started using the people names for storms, in which years (if any) did we have so many storms that we went into the alphas? Thanks again.
Question for you: who decides if a name is retired, is it NHC? Also, I wonder what their criteria for retirement is? I know it's significant damage and destruction, but you've also named a few Cat 3 storms that had this whose names were not retired. I'm just wondering how they judge what's significant, if they have some sort of benchmarks they look for.
Thanks! I know you say you've gone over this before but it was new to me and so I very much appreciate you discussing this again.
Maybe this could go in a S2K FAQ somewhere so you could just point people to it when the question pops up again.
I'm also curious: Since we started using the people names for storms, in which years (if any) did we have so many storms that we went into the alphas? Thanks again.
0 likes
None
None, as far as I know. The closest approach was 1933, which, if the naming system were used then, would have gone to W. That year had 21 storms.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: abajan, ElectricStorm, facemane, Google [Bot], islandgirl45, johngaltfla, Keldeo1997, LAF92, ouragans, Pelicane, Stratton23, TampaWxLurker, Tireman4 and 137 guests