Can the Greek alphabet storms be retired?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Aqua Teen Hunger Force

Can the Greek alphabet storms be retired?

#1 Postby Aqua Teen Hunger Force » Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:19 pm

Assuming we get to greek letters, and one of them becomes a cat 5 (which I heard means being automatically retired) would it still get retired though? If so, what will replace it?
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

#2 Postby sma10 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:40 am

Good question. I assume that if it was just named "Alpha", then they would have to retire Alpha. But they might name it Alpha2005 and then they wouldn't really have to worry about it. Personally, I don't think we'll have to worry about this situation for a long, long time.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#3 Postby senorpepr » Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:43 am

Wow... this question keeps popping up. I'll repeat once again.

A) Storms are NOT automatically retired if they become category five. They must cause significant damage and/or casualities. A category five fish will NOT be retired.

B) The "overtime" storms will be named: "Alpha" "Beta" "Gamma" etc. No year will be tacked on the end.

C) Greek letters will NOT be retired. They don't retire depression numbers and they don't retire Greek letters. Only names that cause significant damage and/or casualities.
0 likes   

FunkMasterB
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:24 am

#4 Postby FunkMasterB » Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:44 am

I don't know the answer, but I think they shouldn't retire the whole letter but should give numbers to the subsequent storms with that name.

So, if Hurricane Alpha is a major hurricane, you can retire that name, but the next year we 'batted around' we'd call the storm Alpha 2. That's the way I'd do it.

I wonder if that made any sense.
0 likes   

FunkMasterB
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:24 am

#5 Postby FunkMasterB » Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:45 am

C) Greek letters will NOT be retired. They don't retire depression numbers and they don't retire Greek letters. Only names that cause significant damage and/or casualities.

Yes, but what if a Greek lettered storm causes significant damage and/or casualties? That's the question (I think).
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#6 Postby senorpepr » Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:49 am

FunkMasterB wrote:
C) Greek letters will NOT be retired. They don't retire depression numbers and they don't retire Greek letters. Only names that cause significant damage and/or casualities.

Yes, but what if a Greek lettered storm causes significant damage and/or casualties? That's the question (I think).


Note that I said "names" will be retired... not letters.

Names like Andrew, Charley, and Katrina can be retired.
Letters like Alpha, Beta, and Gamma cannot be retired.
Numbers like One, Two, and Three cannot be retired.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#7 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:50 am

senorpepr wrote:Storms are NOT automatically retired if they become category five. They must cause significant damage and/or casualities. A category five fish will NOT be retired.


Thanks for bringing that up. And here's a good example:

Image

Hurricane Dog in 1950 lasted 48 hours as a Cat 5, second longest-lasting Cat 5 in recorded history. The name Dog came back in 1951 and was never retired.
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

#8 Postby sma10 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:04 am

senorpepr wrote:
FunkMasterB wrote:
C) Greek letters will NOT be retired. They don't retire depression numbers and they don't retire Greek letters. Only names that cause significant damage and/or casualities.

Yes, but what if a Greek lettered storm causes significant damage and/or casualties? That's the question (I think).


Note that I said "names" will be retired... not letters.

Names like Andrew, Charley, and Katrina can be retired.
Letters like Alpha, Beta, and Gamma cannot be retired.
Numbers like One, Two, and Three cannot be retired.


Pepr I'm gonna challenge you on this one.

For the sake of argument, let's say Alpha forms in late Oct this year in the Caribbean. After striking Haiti and Dominican Rep (killing 50,000 people) it moves into the Gulf and strikes Houston/Galveston (killing another 500 people and causing damages of $100 Billion). Fast forward to 2006. We have yet another blockbuster season and reach storm #22. Do you honestly believe NHC will begin issuing advisories on Alpha? You may think so, but I don't.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#9 Postby senorpepr » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:08 am

Well... your example really isn't all that good, but nice try. Dog is not a name... it's a letter and therefore couldn't be retired even if it struck land.

Ethel (1960) was category five for a short time before making landfall on the Gulf Coast. It was not retired. Ethel is one of three category fives that weren't retired.

However... using your example to drive home another point...

Back in the early 50s we used a military alphabet for naming storms. (Able, Baker, Charley) Once again... names can be retired, but letters (such as Able, Baker, and Charley [the letter, not the name]) cannot.

Case in point... Baker 1950 caused a bit of damage/casualties along Alabama and Florida. Had this been a named storm instead of a lettered storm, it would have been retired.

Easy 1950 struck Florida as a three. It also cause quite a bit of damage/casualities.

King 1950 struck Cuba as a three and caused damage/casualities.

All of the aforementioned names were used again.

Better yet... Charley 1951 [the letter, not the name] struck the Yucatan as a four. It was used again [as a letter, then a name].

Fox 1952 struck Cuba as a four. Once again, it was not retired.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#10 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:10 am

senorpepr wrote:Well... your example really isn't all that good, but nice try. Dog is not a name... it's a letter and therefore couldn't be retired even if it struck land.

Ethel (1960) was category five for a short time before making landfall on the Gulf Coast. It was not retired. Ethel is one of three category fives that weren't retired.

However... using your example to drive home another point...

Back in the early 50s we used a military alphabet for naming storms. (Able, Baker, Charley) Once again... names can be retired, but letters (such as Able, Baker, and Charley [the letter, not the name]) cannot.

Case in point... Baker 1950 caused a bit of damage/casualties along Alabama and Florida. Had this been a named storm instead of a lettered storm, it would have been retired.

Easy 1950 struck Florida as a three. It also cause quite a bit of damage/casualities.

King 1950 struck Cuba as a three and caused damage/casualities.

All of the aforementioned names were used again.

Better yet... Charley 1951 [the letter, not the name] struck the Yucatan as a four. It was used again [as a letter, then a name].

Fox 1952 struck Cuba as a four. Once again, it was not retired.


Wow, ya learn something new every day (or night in this instance). Thanks for the FYI Senorpepr. I had never known that.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#11 Postby senorpepr » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:10 am

sma10 wrote:Pepr I'm gonna challenge you on this one.

For the sake of argument, let's say Alpha forms in late Oct this year in the Caribbean. After striking Haiti and Dominican Rep (killing 50,000 people) it moves into the Gulf and strikes Houston/Galveston (killing another 500 people and causing damages of $100 Billion). Fast forward to 2006. We have yet another blockbuster season and reach storm #22. Do you honestly believe NHC will begin issuing advisories on Alpha? You may think so, but I don't.


Well... like I said in my last post... there was no problem reusing letters back in the early 50s each year after they caused plenty of damage. Plenty of people have died from a depression called "12". That number isn't retired. You won't see Alpha retired in the example you have above. It's just how it goes.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#12 Postby senorpepr » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:19 am

senorpepr wrote:Ethel (1960) was category five for a short time before making landfall on the Gulf Coast. It was not retired. Ethel is one of three category fives that weren't retired.


To add on...

Ethel (1960) and Cleo (1958) were both category fives without being retired.

As for the third: Edith (1971). Edith actually struck Central America as a category five. Thankfully it only killed 43 people. Although it was never used again, it was never retired.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#13 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:25 am

senorpepr wrote:
senorpepr wrote:Ethel (1960) was category five for a short time before making landfall on the Gulf Coast. It was not retired. Ethel is one of three category fives that weren't retired.


To add on...

Ethel (1960) and Cleo (1958) were both category fives without being retired.

As for the third: Edith (1971). Edith actually struck Central America as a category five. Thankfully it only killed 43 people. Although it was never used again, it was never retired.


Well sorry if this hijacks the original thread but did Ethel really reach Cat 5? I mean it would be pretty amazing to have a TS in the middle of the GOM that explodes to a Cat 5 off the mouth of the Mississippi River, but then implodes again in the last 100 miles before landfall to a TS. Would be amazing on radar to say the least.

Numerous members, including Derek Ortt, have said that Ethel didn't reach Cat 5. From what you've written, and all the historical sources out there, the consensus is that it did. What do you think? B/C if Ethel really didn't reach Cat 5 well then one of your examples would be off.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#14 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:28 am

There is no way Ethel was a cat5. How could it I mean tropical storm to cat5 then tropical storm for landfall.
:eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#15 Postby senorpepr » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:35 am

Well... Derek's claim that Ethel was not a category five is his professional opinion. To be honest, in my professional opinion, I agree with him. I find it hard to believe. However, until the reanalysis states otherwise, it was a category five.



Here are a couple of govt websites listing Ethel as a category five:
http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/satellite/s ... t5hur.html
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_page ... TLdate.dat
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4246
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

#16 Postby abajan » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:43 am

wxmann_91 wrote:Hurricane Dog in 1950 lasted 48 hours as a Cat 5, second longest-lasting Cat 5 in recorded history. The name Dog came back in 1951 and was never retired.

Wow, seems dogs have nine lives too! :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
jimvb
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Contact:

Alpha

#17 Postby jimvb » Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:13 am

The principle that names get retired but numbers and letters don't is merely a rule about how we use words and letters, not a fact carved in stone. The NHC has not said as far as I can tell whether it would retire Alpha if it was a major storm that caused problems.

A (capital alpha) is a letter. Alpha is a word and a name. It is part of the name of the nearest star system to the Sun, Alpha Centauri.

Some alternatives for a destructive Alpha cyclone are:

Increment the name. Next year, the 22nd storm would be called Alphb.
Skip the name. Next year, the 22nd storm would be Beta.
Cycle the names. The 22nd storm this year would be Arlene; possibly Arlene 2.
Year the name. The 22nd storm this year would be Alpha 2005.
Use another alphabet. The 22nd storm next year would be Aleph.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherfreak14
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC
Contact:

#18 Postby Weatherfreak14 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:17 am

I wonder still if we will get that far this year because everytime, thankfuklly, we have a nice break from a storm it seems. Last year it seemed as every hurricane made landfall anotherone was born.
0 likes   

inotherwords
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 773
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:04 pm
Location: Nokomis, FL

#19 Postby inotherwords » Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:49 am

senorpepr, thanks for the fascinating info!

Question for you: who decides if a name is retired, is it NHC? Also, I wonder what their criteria for retirement is? I know it's significant damage and destruction, but you've also named a few Cat 3 storms that had this whose names were not retired. I'm just wondering how they judge what's significant, if they have some sort of benchmarks they look for.

Thanks! I know you say you've gone over this before but it was new to me and so I very much appreciate you discussing this again.

Maybe this could go in a S2K FAQ somewhere so you could just point people to it when the question pops up again.

I'm also curious: Since we started using the people names for storms, in which years (if any) did we have so many storms that we went into the alphas? Thanks again.
0 likes   

User avatar
jimvb
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Contact:

None

#20 Postby jimvb » Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:59 am

None, as far as I know. The closest approach was 1933, which, if the naming system were used then, would have gone to W. That year had 21 storms.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: abajan, ElectricStorm, facemane, Google [Bot], islandgirl45, johngaltfla, Keldeo1997, LAF92, ouragans, Pelicane, Stratton23, TampaWxLurker, Tireman4 and 137 guests