To Those Who Said 2004 Could Not Be Repeated In Florida

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
recmod
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

To Those Who Said 2004 Could Not Be Repeated In Florida

#1 Postby recmod » Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:55 pm

I remember when forecasters started making their predictions of an active 2005 Hurricane Season, some S2K members expressed concern that Florida might see a repeat of the 2004 season. There was almost universal condemnation of such a possibility. Many well-respected S2K members, among them some professional meteorologists, said there was NO WAY that Florida would be struck by 4 hurricanes again.

Well, the 2005 Season has proven all the nay-sayers wrong. Wilma was the 4th Hurricane to impact Florida this year (following Dennis, Katrina & Rita), and the 6th tropical system overall (including Tropical Storms Arlene and Tammy).

Some may argue that Rita shouldn't count in Florida's strike tally, since it scraped by south of the Keys, not actually making landfall in the state. However, if we eliminate Rita, we must also remove 2004's Ivan, since that storm made landfall in Alabama.

The two year tally for Florida is as follows:

2004

Bonnie~ Tropical Storm 50 mph
Charley~ Cat. 4 Hurricane 150 mph
Frances~ Cat. 2 Hurricane 105 mph
Ivan~ Cat. 3 Hurricane 130mph
Jeanne~ Cat. 3 Hurricane 120 mph

2005

Arlene~ Tropical Storm 70 mph
Dennis~ Cat. 3 Hurricane 120 mph
Katrina~ Cat. 1 Hurricane 80 mph
Rita~ Cat. 2 Hurricane 100 mph
Tammy~ Tropical Storm 50 mph
Wilma~ Cat. 3 Hurricane 125 mph

That is 8 Hurricanes and a total of 11 tropical systems impacting Florida in a span of just over 14 months. This is the most intense flurry of hurricane activity ever recorded in Florida's history

Early estimates are already at $9 Billion in INSURED damages for Wilma.... won't that make Wilma the 3rd costliest Hurricane, behind Katrina & Andrew???

--Lou
0 likes   

User avatar
CharleySurvivor
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:38 pm
Location: Tampa, FL formerly Port Charlotte FL

#2 Postby CharleySurvivor » Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:58 pm

and 2006 better be nice and quiet. I'm not -removed- either!
0 likes   

shaggy
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: greenville, n.c.

#3 Postby shaggy » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:00 pm

wilma supposedly had winds of 125mph but no reporting station on land recorded sustained over 100 that i have seen so she was probably not a true cat 3 at landfall.But overall florida is having a rough stretch but thats what happens when you are the only point of land between the GOM and the atlantic!
0 likes   

recmod
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#4 Postby recmod » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:02 pm

How many reporting stations exist in the area of landfall that might have recorded those 125 mph winds?? The hurricane made landfall south of Naples in a nearly uninhabited marshy area of the Everglades. Those maximum 125 mph winds would have only existed in a very small area near and south of the center right along the coast.

--Lou
0 likes   

User avatar
linkerweather
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 261
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:59 am
Location: tampa bay area

Re: To Those Who Said 2004 Could Not Be Repeated In Florida

#5 Postby linkerweather » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:21 pm

recmod wrote:I remember when forecasters started making their predictions of an active 2005 Hurricane Season, some S2K members expressed concern that Florida might see a repeat of the 2004 season. There was almost universal condemnation of such a possibility. Many well-respected S2K members, among them some professional meteorologists, said there was NO WAY that Florida would be struck by 4 hurricanes again.

Well, the 2005 Season has proven all the nay-sayers wrong. Wilma was the 4th Hurricane to impact Florida this year (following Dennis, Katrina & Rita), and the 6th tropical system overall (including Tropical Storms Arlene and Tammy).

Some may argue that Rita shouldn't count in Florida's strike tally, since it scraped by south of the Keys, not actually making landfall in the state. However, if we eliminate Rita, we must also remove 2004's Ivan, since that storm made landfall in Alabama.

The two year tally for Florida is as follows:

2004

Bonnie~ Tropical Storm 50 mph
Charley~ Cat. 4 Hurricane 150 mph
Frances~ Cat. 2 Hurricane 105 mph
Ivan~ Cat. 3 Hurricane 130mph
Jeanne~ Cat. 3 Hurricane 120 mph

2005

Arlene~ Tropical Storm 70 mph
Dennis~ Cat. 3 Hurricane 120 mph
Katrina~ Cat. 1 Hurricane 80 mph
Rita~ Cat. 2 Hurricane 100 mph
Tammy~ Tropical Storm 50 mph
Wilma~ Cat. 3 Hurricane 125 mph

That is 8 Hurricanes and a total of 11 tropical systems impacting Florida in a span of just over 14 months. This is the most intense flurry of hurricane activity ever recorded in Florida's history

Early estimates are already at $9 Billion in INSURED damages for Wilma.... won't that make Wilma the 3rd costliest Hurricane, behind Katrina & Andrew???

--Lou


TS CINdy, although landfall in LA left a surge in W. Florida along with TS winds in the Panhandle
0 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3252
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

Re: To Those Who Said 2004 Could Not Be Repeated In Florida

#6 Postby chris_fit » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:49 pm

recmod wrote:Early estimates are already at $9 Billion in INSURED damages for Wilma.... won't that make Wilma the 3rd costliest Hurricane, behind Katrina & Andrew???

--Lou


Think Charley was around $15 Billion
0 likes   

Anonymous

Re: To Those Who Said 2004 Could Not Be Repeated In Florida

#7 Postby Anonymous » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:55 pm

chris_fit wrote:
recmod wrote:Early estimates are already at $9 Billion in INSURED damages for Wilma.... won't that make Wilma the 3rd costliest Hurricane, behind Katrina & Andrew???

--Lou


Think Charley was around $15 Billion


Yes...and Wilma with 9 billion INSURED would be about 18 billion.
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#8 Postby djtil » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:55 pm

wilma supposedly had winds of 125mph but no reporting station on land recorded sustained over 100 that i have seen so she was probably not a true cat 3 at landfall.But overall florida is having a rough stretch but thats what happens when you are the only point of land between the GOM and the atlantic!


this seems to be a very common theme with nearly every storm. i think the 90% reduction that is gone with is a tad liberal.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#9 Postby Anonymous » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:56 pm

djtil wrote:
wilma supposedly had winds of 125mph but no reporting station on land recorded sustained over 100 that i have seen so she was probably not a true cat 3 at landfall.But overall florida is having a rough stretch but thats what happens when you are the only point of land between the GOM and the atlantic!


this seems to be a very common theme with nearly every storm. i think the 90% reduction that is gone with is a tad liberal.


report of 125 mph sustained and a gust to 134 mph at Dry Tortugas before instrument failed.
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4275
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

#10 Postby abajan » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:58 pm

CharleySurvivor wrote:and 2006 better be nice and quiet. I'm not -removed- either!

The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

You'll probably get your wish because I think it's expected by some to be an El Nino year. However, 2007 could be a problem because La Ninas sometimes follow El Ninos and, if memory serves me correctly, 1995 was a La Nina year.
0 likes   

User avatar
Regit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2341
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Myrtle Beach

Re: To Those Who Said 2004 Could Not Be Repeated In Florida

#11 Postby Regit » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:00 pm

recmod wrote:Early estimates are already at $9 Billion in INSURED damages for Wilma.... won't that make Wilma the 3rd costliest Hurricane, behind Katrina & Andrew???

--Lou


To help, the current list (with Katrina being the only 2005 storm added so far) is:

Katrina: $70-130 Billion est.
Andrew: $43.6 Billion
Charley: $15 Billion
Ivan: $14.2 Billion
Hugo: $12.3 Billion
Agnes: $11.3 Billion
Betsy: $10.8 Billion
Frances: $8.9 Billion
Camille: $8.9 Billion
Diane: $7 Billion

The list is, of course, adjusted for inflation.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#12 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:03 pm

abajan wrote:
CharleySurvivor wrote:and 2006 better be nice and quiet. I'm not -removed- either!

The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

You'll probably get your wish because I think it's expected by some to be an El Nino year. However, 2007 could be a problem because La Ninas sometimes follow El Ninos and, if memory serves me correctly, 1995 was a La Nina year.


According to a member here (El Nino), neutral ENSO conditions are expected through 2009.
0 likes   

User avatar
Regit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2341
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Myrtle Beach

#13 Postby Regit » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:04 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
abajan wrote:
CharleySurvivor wrote:and 2006 better be nice and quiet. I'm not -removed- either!

The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

You'll probably get your wish because I think it's expected by some to be an El Nino year. However, 2007 could be a problem because La Ninas sometimes follow El Ninos and, if memory serves me correctly, 1995 was a La Nina year.


According to a member here (El Nino), neutral ENSO conditions are expected through 2009.



I've also heard some say they expect La Nina next year. LoL Never know what to believe. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#14 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:10 pm

From Jesse Bass updating for Mark Sudduth:
Mark had a wind gust to 135mph on the Chevy Tahoe this morning as the backside, or western eyewall of Wilma came ashore.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#15 Postby f5 » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:14 pm

Katrina will always be #1 in cost unless a major metro gets a direct hit from a CAT 5 ex Houston,tampa,nyc
0 likes   

User avatar
gilbert88
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 367
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:57 pm

#16 Postby gilbert88 » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:17 pm

f5 wrote:Katrina will always be #1 in cost unless a major metro gets a direct hit from a CAT 5 ex Houston,tampa,nyc


In NYC a moderate Cat. 3 would suffice to surpass Katrina...
Last edited by gilbert88 on Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#17 Postby f5 » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:20 pm

of course New Orleans is a small village compared to NYC also a NYC hit would bring a worldwide economic crash
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#18 Postby Andrew92 » Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:07 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
abajan wrote:
CharleySurvivor wrote:and 2006 better be nice and quiet. I'm not -removed- either!

The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

You'll probably get your wish because I think it's expected by some to be an El Nino year. However, 2007 could be a problem because La Ninas sometimes follow El Ninos and, if memory serves me correctly, 1995 was a La Nina year.


According to a member here (El Nino), neutral ENSO conditions are expected through 2009.


Sorry to be frank, but who said that? And is it possible to predict even ENSO conditions four years out like that?

-Andrew92
0 likes   

quandary
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:04 pm

#19 Postby quandary » Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:06 pm

ncdowneast wrote:wilma supposedly had winds of 125mph but no reporting station on land recorded sustained over 100 that i have seen so she was probably not a true cat 3 at landfall.But overall florida is having a rough stretch but thats what happens when you are the only point of land between the GOM and the atlantic!


Highest winds are never recorded. Basically, if you get a decent set of gusts at a certain speed, that's probably the highest wind at the time.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#20 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:10 pm

Andrew92 wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:
abajan wrote:
CharleySurvivor wrote:and 2006 better be nice and quiet. I'm not -removed- either!

The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

You'll probably get your wish because I think it's expected by some to be an El Nino year. However, 2007 could be a problem because La Ninas sometimes follow El Ninos and, if memory serves me correctly, 1995 was a La Nina year.


According to a member here (El Nino), neutral ENSO conditions are expected through 2009.


Sorry to be frank, but who said that? And is it possible to predict even ENSO conditions four years out like that?

-Andrew92


Check out this thread and go to the last post:
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=76713
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cdenton12, fllawyer, Lizzytiz1, TallyTracker and 98 guests