Page 1 of 1

Super Typhoon Tip Question

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:22 pm
by Evil Jeremy
what was the wind radius on that storm?

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:26 pm
by EDR1222
The size of the circulation of Tip, according to a report from NOAA, was 1,350 miles, so you can imagine the size of that monster.

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:34 pm
by WindRunner
That is the diameter, however, not the radius.

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:54 pm
by Ptarmigan
Gale force winds in Super Typhoon Tip extended up to 675 miles. As for hurricane force winds, I wonder how far it extended from the center?

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:05 pm
by P.K.
Just checked the best track and it says the longest radius of 30kt winds (Roughly equal to 34kts in a one minute average) was to the NW were it extended out 600NM (1110km), with the shortest 30kt radius being 400NM (740km). 50kt (Ten minute average again) winds were however symmetrical at the time out to a distance of 200NM (370km).

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:35 pm
by Aslkahuna
Should be noted that in 1979 JTWC was considered the Official Typhoon Warning Center-this changed after recon ended in the 1980's and even more so when JT moved to Pearl and the new procedures (and names) went into effect in 2000.

Steve

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:18 pm
by wxmann_91
The pre-1980's configuration was better. I'm sick of hearing the disputes between JMA and JT.

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:01 pm
by Ptarmigan
wxmann_91 wrote:The pre-1980's configuration was better. I'm sick of hearing the disputes between JMA and JT.


I've seen reports of Tip at its peak of having sustained winds of either 160 mph and 190 mph.

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 5:06 pm
by Aslkahuna
JT carried Tip at 165kt which is 190 mph. Interestingly enough, there are two storms (Angela '95 and Gay '92) in the post recon era that have had higher Dvoraks than Tip and two others, Joan and Ivan in 1997 with similar Dvoraks to Tip but without recon none of those storms were rated as high as Tip.

91, you are always going to see comparisons between JT and JMA because although JMA is the official agency for Typhoon warnings, JT puts out position forecasts out to 120 hours and thus is better for track estimates. Also JTWC puts out a forecast discussion on the storm unlike JMA. Personally, from what I saw on satellite, JMA was slow to declare Ioke ET.

Steve

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:09 pm
by Jim Cantore
I believe TS winds were 1300 out from the center.

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:21 pm
by brunota2003
This ought to give you a good size relation...from Wikipedia, the biggest and smallest tropical cyclones:
Image
The relative sizes of the United States, Typhoon Tip and Cyclone Tracy (the largest and smallest tropical cyclones recorded)
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon_Tip

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:32 pm
by JonathanBelles
can you put a relative image of tip and florence together.

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:37 pm
by Ptarmigan
Aslkahuna wrote:JT carried Tip at 165kt which is 190 mph. Interestingly enough, there are two storms (Angela '95 and Gay '92) in the post recon era that have had higher Dvoraks than Tip and two others, Joan and Ivan in 1997 with similar Dvoraks to Tip but without recon none of those storms were rated as high as Tip.

91, you are always going to see comparisons between JT and JMA because although JMA is the official agency for Typhoon warnings, JT puts out position forecasts out to 120 hours and thus is better for track estimates. Also JTWC puts out a forecast discussion on the storm unlike JMA. Personally, from what I saw on satellite, JMA was slow to declare Ioke ET.

Steve


Since Tip is large, think about the storm surge and damage it could cause to any location, whether it is Houston, New Orleans, Miami, or New York. :eek: