In the example you shared, CrazyC83 mentioned a “77kt TVS”.
First, I should make it clear that the 77kt figure really doesn’t mean much to the average person and can be misleading.
That 77kt figure is the MDV or maximum delta velocity. In this case, 77kt is the greatest velocity difference of all the two-dimensional circulations.
If you use a program such as GRLevel3, you will receive this data on specific storm cells.
For instance, using GRLevel3, I analysized a cell in the Panhandle of Texas.
Type: TVS
Cell: B0
AVGDV: 52KT
LLDV: 77KT
MDV: 92KT
Hgt: 9600ft
Depth: 27300ft
Base: 3600ft
Top: 30900ft
MXSHR: 34/ks
Hgt: 9600ft
In the above data, this cell is a tornadic vortex signature (TVS). This is defined as a three-dimensional circulation with a base located on the 0.5° slice (below 600m above radar level). The depth of the circulation must be at least 1500m. Additionally, the maximum shear detected anywhere in the circulation must be at least 72kt or at least 50kt at the base of the circulation.
Cell B0 is nothing more than a way to ID the storm, much like giving a tropical storm a name.
AVGDV is the average delta velocity—the average weighted velocity difference of all the 2-D circulations.
(Delta velocity is the difference between the maximum negative velocity [inbound] and maximum positive velocity [outbound].)
LLDV is the low-level delta velocity—the greatest velocity difference of the lowest 2-D circulation.
MDV, as mentioned above, is the maximum delta velocity—the greatest velocity difference of all 2-D circulations.
Depth is the thickness of the 3-D circulation.
Base is the lowest altitude of the 3-D circulation.
Top is the highest altitude of the 3-D circulation.
MXSHR is the maximum shear—the maximum at all elevation scans of the quantity gate-togate velocity difference divided by the diameter of the TVS.
I should also point out what Greg Stumpf mentioned on another message board:
Greg Stumpf wrote: The TDA (Tornado Detection Algorithm) is a misnomer. It is not designed to "detect tornadoes". At NSSL, the algorithm was called the TVS Detection Algorithm, and bear in mind that not all TVSs are assocaited with tornadoes (only about 35-40% in the data set we had, assuming a LLDV > 25 or MXDV > 36, and depth > 1 km). Folks using inverted red traingles to indicate the locations are doing a disservice to the NSSL folks who originally developed this algorithm (yours truly was one of the scientists on the team) since it looks like a tornado when it isn't necessarily a tornado.
Hopefully this points you in the right direction.