Tropical Storm Chris

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
BirdyCin
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:29 am
Location: Dania Beach, FL

#1981 Postby BirdyCin » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:41 pm

brunota2003 wrote:I dont like the UKMET or the FSU MM5, I really dont like how they have shifted north alot from yesterday...not worried about being hit at all...just dont like how they have jumped north...



And my question is "Why?" What are they picking up on?
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#1982 Postby dwg71 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:42 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:What i'm seeing from the storm still appears to be a well organized system. Convection is firing heavily near the center and even the latest NHC's Discussion is calling for the storm to continue moving into a FAVORABLE environment.



So what's all this about weakening?


Recent recon and sattelite's show this, maybe its temporary, maybe not.
0 likes   

ericinmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1573
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 11:15 pm
Location: Miami Lakes, FL

#1983 Postby ericinmia » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:43 pm

The 18K is slowly coming in for 12z....

its showing that same 'bump' to the N-NW in the next 24 hours...

Image
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#1984 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:45 pm

dwg71 wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:What i'm seeing from the storm still appears to be a well organized system. Convection is firing heavily near the center and even the latest NHC's Discussion is calling for the storm to continue moving into a FAVORABLE environment.



So what's all this about weakening?


Recent recon and sattelite's show this, maybe its temporary, maybe not.

Someone tell me WHAT THEY SHOW.


They show the windfield of the storm getting larger, I see convection building to the West.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

#1985 Postby Pebbles » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:45 pm

Derek is right... it is getting sheared some. If you look at a high quality visible rapid scan you can see the cloud tops on the NW side of the storm heading SE towards the center of the storm rather then away. Thus I think outflow isn't as nice as it was this morning. Also outflow boundries are quite evident on the NW side of the system on the high quality visible.
0 likes   

User avatar
Noles2006
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:57 am
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

#1986 Postby Noles2006 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:45 pm

Canelaw99 wrote:LOL Mascpa - it's ok though because Miami can take FSU anytime ;)

Now, back to topic - I, also, don't like the big jump that 2 of these models have taken now...could be a start of a trend or it could be the normal model jumping that happens with storms....have to keep watching to be sure I s'pose...


Nah, man... 10-7, baby, and another FSU "W" in about a month from now. Also, we don't hate Miami... we hate UF. :wink:

Back to CHRIS... he's confusing the hell out of all of us. First, he strengthens when we think he's going to weaken... then weakens when we think he's going to strengthen... I guess it goes to show that the tropics are so unpredictable we should ALWAYS keep our eyes on the oceans.
0 likes   

User avatar
Grease Monkey
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 727
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:25 pm

#1987 Postby Grease Monkey » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:45 pm

Anything is possible because with all this reorganization happening with this system, I wouldn't be suprised to see decent shifts in the tracks.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#1988 Postby stormtruth » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:45 pm

dwg71 wrote:
stormtruth wrote:
Trugunzn wrote:Chris is up to something


Looks like he found a power-up box.


I'm not seeing this strenghthening??? I see a storm dealing with shear and an exposed center. What am I missing?


Are you looking at the latest images and seeing the convection increase?
0 likes   

User avatar
TexasF6
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Austin, TX

#1989 Postby TexasF6 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:46 pm

Sorry Windrunner! You don't have to yell...my guess is RECON is flying in the Eastern half of the storm to gather info for later model runs.....someone will correct me if I am in error....when is next vort due out? He is powering up again, like I noted earlier with the wrapping comment....:D
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#1990 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:47 pm

Grease Monkey wrote:Anything is possible because with all this reorganization happening with this system, I wouldn't be suprised to see decent shifts in the tracks.
I doubt that. The main player (the ridge) is still what will steer this system.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#1991 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:47 pm

looks like it's looking a bit more ragged and not quite as nicely shaped as it was before. I"m thinking that it won't reach hurricane strength until tomorrow morning. It's not looking that great right now.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#1992 Postby dwg71 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:47 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:
dwg71 wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:What i'm seeing from the storm still appears to be a well organized system. Convection is firing heavily near the center and even the latest NHC's Discussion is calling for the storm to continue moving into a FAVORABLE environment.



So what's all this about weakening?


Recent recon and sattelite's show this, maybe its temporary, maybe not.

Someone tell me WHAT THEY SHOW.


They show the windfield of the storm getting larger, I see convection building to the West.



Recon shows only 47Kt max winds on last pass, and sats show exposed center and evidence of shear.
Last edited by dwg71 on Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

#1993 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:47 pm

Not surprised really. Climo history seems to bear out once again. Even the strongest and highest ridge will evantually be eroded by other developing features, like UL's

Look at the difference 3 to 6 hours makes on this map

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm1.html

Looks like weakening to me?
0 likes   

StormsAhead
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:38 pm
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts

#1994 Postby StormsAhead » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:49 pm

URNT14 KNHC 021834
SUPPLEMENTARY VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
INBOUND
LAT LON jHHH TTDD ddfff
01182 10628 12564 11515 19023
02184 20630 22561 21513 19026
03186 30631 32559 31514 19031
04188 40633 42545 41313 18042
05189 50636 52537 51515 23034
06191 60637 62530 61616 24035
07194 70639 72516 71616 26030
MF189 M0634 MF047
OBS 01 AT 17:20:30Z
OBS 07 AT 17:47:50Z
OBS 01 SFC WND 21020
OUTBOUND
LAT LON jHHH TTDD ddfff
01198 10641 12503 12015 04029
02200 20643 22523 22012 05029
03201 30645 32537 31813 05030
04203 40647 42548 41515 07034
05205 50649 52553 51616 08029
06207 60651 62554 61616 08026
07208 70653 72558 71616 07023
MF202 M0646 MF036
OBS 01 AT 17:57:10Z
OBS 07 AT 18:23:30Z
OBS 07 SFC WND 07015
AF308 0303A CHRIS OB 06

Max wind 47 knots in the SE quad and 36 knots in the NW quad.
Last edited by StormsAhead on Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#1995 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:49 pm

i cant read that
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#1996 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:50 pm

dwg71 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:what are you seeing that makes you believe this looks better on satellite?

I am seeing the NW outflow become straight, a tell tale sign of shear, and thatthe center is about to become exposed


It's like seeing your own kid play ball, they are always better in your own eye. :D Whether its a trend or just a temporary situation, Chris does not look as good as it did 12 hours ago.


That's what I was going to say...you would thing that everyone is talking about their kid here...they are getting all defensive at the very mention it might not look as well.

It's kinda funny. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#1997 Postby WindRunner » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:51 pm

TexasF6 wrote:Sorry Windrunner! You don't have to yell...my guess is RECON is flying in the Eastern half of the storm to gather info for later model runs.....someone will correct me if I am in error....when is next vort due out? He is powering up again, like I noted earlier with the wrapping comment....:D


Not yelling, that's just the little graphic I did up for when people start getting a good conversation in this thread! Didn't mean to offend or anything . . .
0 likes   

Scorpion

#1998 Postby Scorpion » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:53 pm

Cheezy, I find it hard to believe after the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons you still cannot understand a recon report. Please don't comment until you learn about these things.
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

#1999 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:53 pm

Dry air is hurting it.
0 likes   

User avatar
NONAME
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 373
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:15 am
Location: Where the Wind Blows

#2000 Postby NONAME » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:53 pm

Sorry for asking again but no one told me what column is the Wind in on the USAF FLIGHT LEVEL DATA (MINOBS)
0 likes   


Return to “2006”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests