Ivan Advisories
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Yeah...looks like some serious development is underway. The outflow is still squashed a bit in the far NNW of the storm, but perfect elsewhere and improving there. The ideas I mentioned earlier about a rotation around the northern side of the island are pretty much out of the picture. Ivan will be approaching Jamaica at an angle too far to the south to do this now.
0 likes
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 4019
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
Scott_inVA wrote:greeng13 wrote:calidoug...if you don't mind...what exactly is "bombing"? i've heard it mentioned a few times in the past couple of days
Generally speaking, low pressure "bombs out" when the low drops 24mb in 24 hours. Unscientific but generally accepted.
Scott
Not exactly unscientific. If I remember my Holton right, Bergeron actually defined rapid intensification as a fall equivalent to the rate of 24MB/24hr * (sin [latitiude]) for at least 12 hours.
OK OK...before y'all start calling me Mr. Smarty-pants...all that math gobbledygook means is that you need a fall rate >24MB/24hr north of 45N and <24MB/24hr south of 45N. At least that's what I remember - If anyone cares to dig it up, feel free to correct me on this.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
- TheWriteIdea
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 6:58 pm
- Location: Hendersonville NC
Are people at the NHC "approachable"? Or is this some high and mighty organization where forecasters are "guarded" like the President? I am getting so ticked off reading all this stuff...I feel like picking up the phone and speaking to someone in charge. Of course, since I'm not a met I couldn't coherently articulate my frustration....and I'd probably have the CIA knocking at my door 

0 likes
- charleston_hugo_veteran
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1590
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:47 pm
- Location: Charleston, S.C.
Re: DT says to watch for the point of North turn
Myersgirl wrote:http://www.wxrisk.com/hurricane/hurricanes1.htm#ANALYSIS:
gezzz ...this site is sooo hard to read....
0 likes
- yoda
- Category 5
- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
- Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
- Contact:
Re: DT says to watch for the point of North turn
charleston_hugo_veteran wrote:Myersgirl wrote:http://www.wxrisk.com/hurricane/hurricanes1.htm#ANALYSIS:
gezzz ...this site is sooo hard to read....
I understood it and read it... is there a problem CHV?
0 likes
Re: DT says to watch for the point of North turn
charleston_hugo_veteran wrote:Myersgirl wrote:http://www.wxrisk.com/hurricane/hurricanes1.htm#ANALYSIS:
gezzz ...this site is sooo hard to read....
I'll second that...
0 likes
- huricanwatcher
- Category 3
- Posts: 893
- Age: 65
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 6:09 pm
- Location: Kirkwood NY
- Contact:
- x-y-no
- Category 5
- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
It appears the 12Z GFS was too fast breaking down the ridge
Comparing the initialization of the 18Z GFS:
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/gfs/18/fp0_000.shtml
with the 6 hour of the 12Z GFS:
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/gfs/12/fp0_000.shtml
one sees they are quite different at 500mb.
The anticipated backing off of the 588 hight line hasn't materialized. In fact, the 588 line is now wrapped around to the west of him, which would imply further slowing.
At this point, I'm not going to look further at this run, since it seems the GFS once again is having trouble predicting the strength of a ridge. (besides, it's time to head for the game)
I do still think the low in the Atlantic is going to be a player in this whole thing, and the big question in my mind is how fast the storm moves. I'm still not confident it won't be slower than the models suggest for the next 36 hours at least.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/gfs/18/fp0_000.shtml
with the 6 hour of the 12Z GFS:
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/gfs/12/fp0_000.shtml
one sees they are quite different at 500mb.
The anticipated backing off of the 588 hight line hasn't materialized. In fact, the 588 line is now wrapped around to the west of him, which would imply further slowing.
At this point, I'm not going to look further at this run, since it seems the GFS once again is having trouble predicting the strength of a ridge. (besides, it's time to head for the game)
I do still think the low in the Atlantic is going to be a player in this whole thing, and the big question in my mind is how fast the storm moves. I'm still not confident it won't be slower than the models suggest for the next 36 hours at least.
0 likes
- cloud_galaxy
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:17 pm
- charleston_hugo_veteran
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1590
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:47 pm
- Location: Charleston, S.C.
Re: DT says to watch for the point of North turn
yoda wrote:charleston_hugo_veteran wrote:Myersgirl wrote:http://www.wxrisk.com/hurricane/hurricanes1.htm#ANALYSIS:
gezzz ...this site is sooo hard to read....
I understood it and read it... is there a problem CHV?
it is to busy...different text sizes, graphics here and there, embedded links, colors.....I have nothing against anything but the format of the website....too busy!
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: Jax
- dixiebreeze
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
- Location: crystal river, fla.
Re: DT says to watch for the point of North turn
charleston_hugo_veteran wrote:yoda wrote:charleston_hugo_veteran wrote:Myersgirl wrote:http://www.wxrisk.com/hurricane/hurricanes1.htm#ANALYSIS:
gezzz ...this site is sooo hard to read....
I understood it and read it... is there a problem CHV?
it is to busy...different text sizes, graphics here and there, embedded links, colors.....I have nothing against anything but the format of the website....too busy!
I agree sometimes the site is a bit hard to read because of the format. But I kind of gotten used to it now.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests