NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3654
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1481 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:11 am

aspen wrote:
sasha_B wrote:145 kts means that this has officially surpassed Ragasa (and Humberto/Erin/Errol) in maximum sustained winds. 908 hPa also makes it the second-most-intense storm globally in 2025. Knowing that Ragasa was likely sub-900 and at or above 145 kt itself makes this feat slightly less impressive....but only slightly. For the Atlantic, this is just about top-tier - the peak Dvorak presentation alone was a record-setter.

I missed that insane Dvorak presentation overnight. Is this the first time ever that a system managed to hit T8.0 on ADT? Aside from Eta hitting T8.0+ RAWs.

As I noted here, yes in terms of CI #:
Teban54 wrote:
Travorum wrote:Does Melissa have the highest CI# in Atlantic ADT history? Melissa's CI# just hit 7.8 with the most recent analysis, and the closest I could find in the Atlantic archives going back to ADT's implementation was Milton at a CI# of 7.7.

I assume you're looking at the CIMSS archives; the NOAA archives somehow have different data, with Milton's CI# only peaking at 7.4.

Checking the CIMSS archives, indeed it is:

  • 8.1: Melissa
  • 7.7: Milton
  • 7.3: Irma, Eta
  • 7.2: Rita, Michael
  • 7.1: Dean, Maria, Lorenzo (2019)
  • 7.0: Bill (2009), Matthew, Iota, Kirk (2024), Humberto (2025)
It's possible that the algorithm may have been improved since 2003, so the early comparisons may not be totally applicable. Case in point, Rita was the only storm in 2003-2005 that made this list.

Updated with the latest CI 8.1 for Melissa.
4 likes   

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 242
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1482 Postby sasha_B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:13 am

aspen wrote:
sasha_B wrote:145 kts means that this has officially surpassed Ragasa (and Humberto/Erin/Errol) in maximum sustained winds. 908 hPa also makes it the second-most-intense storm globally in 2025. Knowing that Ragasa was likely sub-900 and at or above 145 kt itself makes this feat slightly less impressive....but only slightly. For the Atlantic, this is just about top-tier - the peak Dvorak presentation alone was a record-setter.

I missed that insane Dvorak presentation overnight. Is this the first time ever that a system managed to hit T8.0 on ADT? Aside from Eta hitting T8.0+ RAWs.


I believe so, yes. There was some discussion of ADT records earlier; IIRC Melissa now holds the records for CI/Final T# (8.1) and Adj. T# (8.3) in the Atlantic.
3 likes   

Fancy1002
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2022 3:47 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1483 Postby Fancy1002 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:18 am

I wish the NOAA plane would do one more pass-through before heading home.
0 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 596
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1484 Postby Travorum » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:21 am

Fancy1002 wrote:I wish the NOAA plane would do one more pass-through before heading home.


From the NHC discussion they were supposed to but hit extreme turbulence:

The NOAA aircraft left the storm early after experiencing severe turbulence in the southwestern eyewall.
7 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1037
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1485 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:24 am

https://fr24.com/TEAL76/3cd8177d

NE to SW pass incoming.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148189
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1486 Postby cycloneye » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:24 am

5 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1487 Postby TallyTracker » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:32 am

This is going to be like a 50-mile wide tornado where it makes landfall. I’d be looking for a reinforced concrete building or underground basement (outside a flood zone). I’m concerned that their building codes no matter how much they may have improved after Gilbert are going to be no match for a storm of this caliber. Praying for the folks there to be safe.
5 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2516
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1488 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:38 am

chaser1 wrote:
ScottNAtlanta wrote:I just looked, and there are 202 guests on this thread...wow


Perhaps Bing [BOT] & Google [BOT] brought all their [BOT] friends :cheesy:

Well...it's up to 353 now...that's a lotta bots
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 596
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1489 Postby Travorum » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:38 am

TallyTracker wrote:This is going to be like a 50-mile wide tornado where it makes landfall. I’d be looking for a reinforced concrete building or underground basement (outside a flood zone). I’m concerned that their building codes no matter how much they may have improved after Gilbert are going to be no match for a storm of this caliber. Praying for the folks there to be safe.


I'm really concerned about Melissa potentially making landfall near Treasure Beach. There are populated areas immediately east of there that are on cliffs 400m tall right near the coast that would be in the right front quadrant eyewall, and we saw from the dropsondes earlier what the winds look like 400m up.
Last edited by Travorum on Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5751
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1490 Postby chaser1 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:39 am

Travorum wrote:
chaser1 wrote:Just curious but does anyone happen to know where the Island's primary electrical infrastructure/production centers are located? I would assume relative proximity to Kingston but that's just a guess


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_Jamaica

I found this list for production, It looks like by capacity most production infrastructure is located in the two parishes to the west of Kingston (St Catherine and Clarendon), with some capacity in Kingston itself. There are also a few notable production facilities up near Montego Bay. There are several wind farms and a hydroelectric plant near where Melissa is more likely to make landfall in St Elizabeth parish, they produce a little over 100MW combined.


Interesting stuff, thanks. Well, it's possible that the storms core might impact Jamaica's west end more directly and that wouldn't bode well for their Montego Bay power facilities (and especially bad for their tourism industry). Still, it appears that the greater part of their power grid is further east and closer to Kingston. Hopefully that area will be spared the worst wind. Sadly, the storm surge impact there will be extreme. That'll further exacerbate the destruction of their Barge Power facilities near and just east of Kingston. Short of some westward shift miracle, all in all this is going to be a tragic disaster.

Furthermore, where significant elevation changes may provide protection from storm surge and flooding from rainfall, only increases the risk of higher winds with height. I wonder what extent of the high population areas are modernized to the extent of providing high groun with good stablished drainage regions with facilities that ideally would have or be connected to underground electric? Better yet, underground emergency facilities or basement-like shelters.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

ATDoel
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2025 8:02 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1491 Postby ATDoel » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:41 am

TallyTracker wrote:This is going to be like a 50-mile wide tornado where it makes landfall. I’d be looking for a reinforced concrete building or underground basement (outside a flood zone). I’m concerned that their building codes no matter how much they may have improved after Gilbert are going to be no match for a storm of this caliber. Praying for the folks there to be safe.
I don't believe many, if any, of their homes are stick built so that should really help. There's going to be missing roofs but I don't think we'll see an extensive number of homes swept off their foundation from wind like you would in a severe tornado. Now the mudslides and surge on the other hand.....
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5751
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1492 Postby chaser1 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:43 am

ScottNAtlanta wrote:
chaser1 wrote:
ScottNAtlanta wrote:I just looked, and there are 202 guests on this thread...wow


Perhaps Bing [BOT] & Google [BOT] brought all their [BOT] friends :cheesy:

Well...it's up to 353 now...that's a lotta bots


We're their analytical mosh pit :hehe:
2 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3654
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1493 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:43 am

ScottNAtlanta wrote:
chaser1 wrote:
ScottNAtlanta wrote:I just looked, and there are 202 guests on this thread...wow


Perhaps Bing [BOT] & Google [BOT] brought all their [BOT] friends :cheesy:

Well...it's up to 353 now...that's a lotta bots

The thread got to 400 guests last night.
2 likes   

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 242
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1494 Postby sasha_B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:46 am

Lightning is still going wild in the eyewall despite signs that pressure has begun to fill in....I know "fluctuations in intensity" typically means gradual weakening following a high-end peak, but there might be time left for Melissa to rebound even if her intensity levels off or slips temporarily. She is, after all, officially forecast to stay around 145 kts for another 12 hours...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148189
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1495 Postby cycloneye » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:47 am

Here is a image that all have to archive and screenshot. The eye of Melissa from the NOAA plane that Andy Hazelton was as part of crew.

Image
11 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4248
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1496 Postby Category5Kaiju » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:48 am

Also, Melissa is the first WCAR Category 5 hurricane we've had since 2007. Melissa pretty much meets the descriptions of the stereotypical "late-season WCAR monster" that wx enthusiasts constantly rave about. :lol:
6 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1497 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:48 am



Does this loop look like Melissa is moving east, or is the orientation upside down??
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1498 Postby TallyTracker » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:49 am

Travorum wrote:
TallyTracker wrote:This is going to be like a 50-mile wide tornado where it makes landfall. I’d be looking for a reinforced concrete building or underground basement (outside a flood zone). I’m concerned that their building codes no matter how much they may have improved after Gilbert are going to be no match for a storm of this caliber. Praying for the folks there to be safe.


I'm really concerned about Melissa potentially making landfall near Treasure Beach. There are populated areas immediately east of there that are on cliffs 400m tall right near the coast that would be in the right front quadrant eyewall, and we saw from the dropsondes earlier what the winds look like 400m up.


That crossed my mind as well. Few buildings can survive 200+ mph gusts at that height. If we had sensors up there it might rival Gustav’s record wind gust in Cuba.
1 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24

ATDoel
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2025 8:02 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1499 Postby ATDoel » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:52 am

FLpanhandle91 wrote:https://fr24.com/TEAL76/3cd8177d

NE to SW pass incoming.


hopefully nothing but they disappeared off the tracker as soon as they hit the eyewall....
0 likes   

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1500 Postby TallyTracker » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:53 am

tulum07 wrote:With the current track, looks like Jamaica will avoid landfall. Next stop, Cuba instead.


There is a non-zero chance of that happening. It’s unlikely and Jamaica should not plan on that. But Cuba should be prepping for at least a Cat 4 hit in case it misses Jamaica and does not weaken as much as anticipated.
7 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 147 guests