NATL: MELISSA - Models

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11814
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#201 Postby GCANE » Wed Oct 22, 2025 6:27 am

3 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10217
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#202 Postby Blown Away » Wed Oct 22, 2025 6:32 am

kevin wrote:Very significant shift SW for GEFS 06z compared to 00z. The 06z operational is still battling the consensus, but if it also flips soon then GFS is also on board with the Euro solution. Stats for the 2 last ensembles out to +84 hr.

Hispaniola landfall = 26% (8/31) in 00z -> 6% (2/31) in 06z
Between Cuba and Jamaica = 6% (2/31) in 00z -> 3% (1/31) in 06z
Jamaica landfall = 13% (4/31) in 00z -> 10% (3/31) in 06z
South of Jamaica = 55% (17/31) in 00z -> 77% (24/31) in 06z
Do not develop = 0% (0/31) in 00z -> 3% (1/31) in 06z

06z
https://i.imgur.com/wOOJ9v2.png

00z
https://i.imgur.com/F6VnDfE.png


Thank you for doing the breakdown, always appreciate that!

I wonder if Melissa will be one of those rare times the Ukmet was right all along. :D
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10217
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#203 Postby Blown Away » Wed Oct 22, 2025 6:43 am

Image

GFS trend... 06z had significant slow down in short range compared to previous runs. IMO, the GFS will be backing off the quick NE movement over Hispaniola and moving more in line with other models sometime today.
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4873
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#204 Postby ronjon » Wed Oct 22, 2025 6:47 am

Have to keep an eye on that trough approaching the Gulf coast it about a week. If it digs deeper and slows down, then a CONUS impact not out of the question. Meanwhile it appears that a consensus is forming from the ensembles of a slow W-SW track south of JAM. If this pans out, we're probably looking at a MH in the western Caribbean.
1 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8928
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#205 Postby aspen » Wed Oct 22, 2025 6:47 am

The 06z hurricane model runs so far seem less west than the 00z suite. HWRF is still comparable to the GFS/ICON. HAFS-A is a little closer to that side of the forecast trend too, while the HAFS-B is so far mostly similar (yet a little less west) than 00z.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8928
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#206 Postby aspen » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:13 am

HWRF has Melissa slow down in the gap between Haiti, Jamaica, and Cuba as a Cat 3. An incredibly perilous position for anyone on those islands.

HMON is closer to Jamaica this run, but the center still passes to the south.

HAFS-A/B are comparable to last run but a little weaker (900-910mb instead of sub-900). Both got a little closer to Haiti and Jamaica than last run, then dipped back south and bombed out into Cat 5s in the WCar.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11814
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#207 Postby GCANE » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:30 am

There may be some validity to this.
HAFS takes it to 902mb SW of Jamaica

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 13L_43.png
0 likes   

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#208 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:36 am

GCANE wrote:There may be some validity to this.
HAFS takes it to 902mb SW of Jamaica

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 13L_43.png


Crazy that at 5 days we are seeing realistic spread from Cat 5 to TS.
1 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

MHC Tracking
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:05 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#209 Postby MHC Tracking » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:40 am

HAFS simulated IR seems to have glitched, even in the Western Caribbean the tropopause isn't this high.

Image
0 likes   

MHC Tracking
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:05 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#210 Postby MHC Tracking » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:42 am

On another note, the 6z HAFS runs are both quite far south (in particular the B). If the system took that track in reality, it could be far enough west when the trough came along to bring impacts to New England (the 0z ECM has a much more easterly track and takes it directly to Nova Scotia).
2 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15493
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#211 Postby NDG » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:45 am

One thing for sure that the AI models like Google's & EC's didn't do well with Melissa was its interaction with the low level jet as it tracked across the eastern Caribbean, they were both erroneously showing a track across Hispaniola. Maybe they're not the models to look at before a storm is formed.
2 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8928
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#212 Postby aspen » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:45 am


Hurricane Eta was able to achieve a very similar T8.0+ IR appearance due to the late season WCar tropopause, despite “only” being 130-140 kt. So if Melissa were to bomb out to the degree that the HAFS models are showing, this IR presentation is very possible.
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

MHC Tracking
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:05 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#213 Postby MHC Tracking » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:48 am

aspen wrote:

Hurricane Eta was able to achieve a very similar T8.0+ IR appearance due to the late season WCar tropopause, despite “only” being 130-140 kt. So if Melissa were to bomb out to the degree that the HAFS models are showing, this IR presentation is very possible.

Eta was not a T8.0, it reached 8.2 via raw ADT values. Dvorak T numbers from TAFB and SAB were 6.5 and 7.0, the latter being the maximum justifiable value as the eye peaked at OW.
1 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11814
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#214 Postby GCANE » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:49 am



Many times I have seen strong tropical cyclones punch thru the tropopause.
They become viscous monsters.
0 likes   

MHC Tracking
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:05 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#215 Postby MHC Tracking » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:51 am

NDG wrote:One thing for sure that the AI models like Google's & EC's didn't do well with Melissa was its interaction with the low level jet as it tracked across the eastern Caribbean, they were both erroneously showing a track across Hispaniola. Maybe they're not the models to look at before a storm is formed.

If I had to guess, there's some intake of GFS data into GDM, as the GFS-core models have been rather arrogant with the outlandish solution of a 90 degree northerly turn into Hispaniola
1 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15493
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#216 Postby NDG » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:00 am

0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15493
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#217 Postby NDG » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:01 am

MHC Tracking wrote:
NDG wrote:One thing for sure that the AI models like Google's & EC's didn't do well with Melissa was its interaction with the low level jet as it tracked across the eastern Caribbean, they were both erroneously showing a track across Hispaniola. Maybe they're not the models to look at before a storm is formed.

If I had to guess, there's some intake of GFS data into GDM, as the GFS-core models have been rather arrogant with the outlandish solution of a 90 degree northerly turn into Hispaniola


Yes that would be a good guess but the EC's AI also had the same erroneous solution.

Edit: BTW, looks like the last time the GFS was upgraded was back in 2021, how often does it usually gets upgraded? I can't recall.
0 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2772
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#218 Postby kevin » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:04 am

06z, Oct/22/2026, hurricane model blend, Melissa

--- Model peak intensity ---
HWRF = 944mb/112kt
HMON = 935mb/119kt
HAFS-A = 901mb/146kt
HAFS-B = 900mb/144kt

--- Hurricane model blend ---

The new 06z hurricane models are somewhat similar to the 00z ones. They show slightly delayed intensification (6 - 12 hours later) and as such this blend 'only' peaks at 127 kt. But all models (with the exception of HWRF due to some land interaction) are still intensifying at +126 hr. The blend also shows a 60 kt peak in the coming 12 hours before struggling around 40 - 50 kt for 2 more days. I think the brief 60 kt peak is not realistic and simply a result of the initialization of Melissa. Like with the 00z cycle, HWRF is the only model which passes between Jamaica and Cuba and the other 3 models go south of Jamaica. HMON is a bit closer to Jamaica compared to 00z, but HAFS-A and HAFS-B are even farther south than they were in 00z and as such the blend average track doesn't really change and still passes close to but south of Jamaica. If the track shifts farther north and Melissa hits Jamaica, this would probably be around cat 3 intensity based on this blend. Uncertainty has gone down compared to 00z: the standard deviation in position at +72/+96/+108hr is now 45/95/130 miles, respectively, instead of 95/120/160 miles in the 00z blend. Still, this uncertainty window is big enough for significant differences in impact with respect to landfalls so this remains a very difficult forecast.

Blend
PEAK: 920 mb @ 126 hrs | 127 kt @ 126 hrs
ACE (0 - 126 hrs) = 13.4
Time (hr) / Pressure (mb) / Wind (kt) / Location (lat, lon [deg])
00 / 999 / 44 /14.0N, 73.3W
06 / 995 / 60
12 / 995 / 51
18 / 997 / 49 / 15.0N, 74.1W
24 / 998 / 42
30 / 998 / 45
36 / 998 / 47 / 15.2N, 75.4W
42 / 996 / 48
48 / 995 / 49
54 / 994 / 49 / 15.8N, 75.0W
60 / 993 / 45
66 / 988 / 61
72 / 985 / 57 / 16.4N, 75.4W
78 / 981 / 68 - C1
84 / 972 / 76
90 / 962 / 94 / 16.5N, 76.2W - C2
96 / 955 / 99 - C3
102 / 946 / 108
108 / 935 / 119 / 16.7N, 77.6W - C4
114 / 932 / 120
120 / 926 / 123
126 / 920 / 127 / 17.0N, 78.3W

--- Previous blend analyses ---

00z, Oct 22 = 911mb/134kt

Forecast track (weighted average of the hurricane model tracks)

Image
6 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8928
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#219 Postby aspen » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:58 am

MHC Tracking wrote:
aspen wrote:

Hurricane Eta was able to achieve a very similar T8.0+ IR appearance due to the late season WCar tropopause, despite “only” being 130-140 kt. So if Melissa were to bomb out to the degree that the HAFS models are showing, this IR presentation is very possible.

Eta was not a T8.0, it reached 8.2 via raw ADT values. Dvorak T numbers from TAFB and SAB were 6.5 and 7.0, the latter being the maximum justifiable value as the eye peaked at OW.

I should’ve clarified that I meant raw T8.0+. It did have the CDO thickness and temperature you’d expect from a T8.0 — just a huge donut of CDG — even though it actually wasn’t one.

But another CDO like that is definitely on the table if the Euro/HAFS track verifies.
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2873
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Models

#220 Postby blp » Wed Oct 22, 2025 9:33 am

Image
3 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: pepecool20 and 75 guests