NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Hurricane Mike
- Category 2

- Posts: 672
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
3pm Video Update on Hurricane Melissa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viSXsGNd0N8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viSXsGNd0N8
0 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34275
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
This is UNOFFICIAL, but here is how I would place the BT as of now.
Much more will come as the rest of the lifespan unfolds, but the rationale for the peak intensity is a blend of the 179 kt FL winds (which translate to 161 kt at the surface) with limited observations (hence a higher intensity seems reasonable), the 172 kt dropsonde and the T8.0 Dvorak reading at the time, plus the continued pressure drop. The peak likely occurred at 1400Z. 175 kt was also considered using the dropsonde at face value, but I took a look back at the fixes to get to that.
Also, the 892 mb pressure is analyzed as the absolute low, based on the 893 mb about 30 minutes later, and slight filling before landfall due to the slight CDO warming.
AL132025, MELISSA, xx,
20251020, 1200, , LO, 13.5N, 66.5W, 30, 1008,
20251020, 1800, , LO, 13.7N, 67.7W, 35, 1006,
20251021, 0000, , LO, 13.9N, 68.9W, 35, 1005,
20251021, 0600, , LO, 14.1N, 70.1W, 40, 1004,
20251021, 1200, , LO, 14.1N, 71.3W, 40, 1003,
20251021, 1800, , LO, 14.1N, 72.5W, 40, 1002,
20251022, 0000, , TS, 14.1N, 73.2W, 45, 1002,
20251022, 0600, , TS, 14.2N, 73.4W, 45, 1001,
20251022, 1200, , TS, 14.3N, 73.6W, 45, 1000,
20251022, 1800, , TS, 14.4N, 73.9W, 40, 1002,
20251023, 0000, , TS, 14.6N, 74.3W, 40, 1004,
20251023, 0600, , TS, 14.8N, 74.6W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1200, , TS, 15.2N, 75.0W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1800, , TS, 15.5N, 75.3W, 40, 1002,
20251024, 0000, , TS, 15.7N, 75.6W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 0600, , TS, 16.0N, 75.3W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 1200, , TS, 15.8N, 74.9W, 45, 1000,
20251024, 1800, , TS, 15.8N, 74.5W, 50, 996,
20251025, 0000, , TS, 16.1N, 74.7W, 55, 993,
20251025, 0600, , TS, 16.3N, 74.9W, 60, 986,
20251025, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 75.1W, 65, 983,
20251025, 1800, , HU, 16.5N, 75.3W, 70, 977,
20251026, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 75.7W, 85, 970,
20251026, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 76.0W, 100, 957,
20251026, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 76.4W, 110, 952,
20251026, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 76.9W, 120, 944,
20251027, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 77.3W, 130, 932,
20251027, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 77.7W, 135, 922,
20251027, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 78.0W, 145, 913,
20251027, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 78.3W, 155, 906,
20251028, 0000, , HU, 16.5N, 78.6W, 155, 905,
20251028, 0600, , HU, 16.9N, 78.4W, 155, 900,
20251028, 1200, , HU, 17.5N, 78.1W, 165, 894,
20251028, 1400, I, HU, 17.9N, 78.0W, 170, 892,
20251028, 1700, L, HU, 18.1N, 78.0W, 160, 897,
20251028, 1800, , HU, 18.2N, 77.9W, 140, 910,
20251020, 1200, , LO, 13.5N, 66.5W, 30, 1008,
20251020, 1800, , LO, 13.7N, 67.7W, 35, 1006,
20251021, 0000, , LO, 13.9N, 68.9W, 35, 1005,
20251021, 0600, , LO, 14.1N, 70.1W, 40, 1004,
20251021, 1200, , LO, 14.1N, 71.3W, 40, 1003,
20251021, 1800, , LO, 14.1N, 72.5W, 40, 1002,
20251022, 0000, , TS, 14.1N, 73.2W, 45, 1002,
20251022, 0600, , TS, 14.2N, 73.4W, 45, 1001,
20251022, 1200, , TS, 14.3N, 73.6W, 45, 1000,
20251022, 1800, , TS, 14.4N, 73.9W, 40, 1002,
20251023, 0000, , TS, 14.6N, 74.3W, 40, 1004,
20251023, 0600, , TS, 14.8N, 74.6W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1200, , TS, 15.2N, 75.0W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1800, , TS, 15.5N, 75.3W, 40, 1002,
20251024, 0000, , TS, 15.7N, 75.6W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 0600, , TS, 16.0N, 75.3W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 1200, , TS, 15.8N, 74.9W, 45, 1000,
20251024, 1800, , TS, 15.8N, 74.5W, 50, 996,
20251025, 0000, , TS, 16.1N, 74.7W, 55, 993,
20251025, 0600, , TS, 16.3N, 74.9W, 60, 986,
20251025, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 75.1W, 65, 983,
20251025, 1800, , HU, 16.5N, 75.3W, 70, 977,
20251026, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 75.7W, 85, 970,
20251026, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 76.0W, 100, 957,
20251026, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 76.4W, 110, 952,
20251026, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 76.9W, 120, 944,
20251027, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 77.3W, 130, 932,
20251027, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 77.7W, 135, 922,
20251027, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 78.0W, 145, 913,
20251027, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 78.3W, 155, 906,
20251028, 0000, , HU, 16.5N, 78.6W, 155, 905,
20251028, 0600, , HU, 16.9N, 78.4W, 155, 900,
20251028, 1200, , HU, 17.5N, 78.1W, 165, 894,
20251028, 1400, I, HU, 17.9N, 78.0W, 170, 892,
20251028, 1700, L, HU, 18.1N, 78.0W, 160, 897,
20251028, 1800, , HU, 18.2N, 77.9W, 140, 910,
Much more will come as the rest of the lifespan unfolds, but the rationale for the peak intensity is a blend of the 179 kt FL winds (which translate to 161 kt at the surface) with limited observations (hence a higher intensity seems reasonable), the 172 kt dropsonde and the T8.0 Dvorak reading at the time, plus the continued pressure drop. The peak likely occurred at 1400Z. 175 kt was also considered using the dropsonde at face value, but I took a look back at the fixes to get to that.
Also, the 892 mb pressure is analyzed as the absolute low, based on the 893 mb about 30 minutes later, and slight filling before landfall due to the slight CDO warming.
10 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
CrazyC83 wrote:This is UNOFFICIAL, but here is how I would place the BT as of now.AL132025, MELISSA, xx,
20251020, 1200, , LO, 13.5N, 66.5W, 30, 1008,
20251020, 1800, , LO, 13.7N, 67.7W, 35, 1006,
20251021, 0000, , LO, 13.9N, 68.9W, 35, 1005,
20251021, 0600, , LO, 14.1N, 70.1W, 40, 1004,
20251021, 1200, , LO, 14.1N, 71.3W, 40, 1003,
20251021, 1800, , LO, 14.1N, 72.5W, 40, 1002,
20251022, 0000, , TS, 14.1N, 73.2W, 45, 1002,
20251022, 0600, , TS, 14.2N, 73.4W, 45, 1001,
20251022, 1200, , TS, 14.3N, 73.6W, 45, 1000,
20251022, 1800, , TS, 14.4N, 73.9W, 40, 1002,
20251023, 0000, , TS, 14.6N, 74.3W, 40, 1004,
20251023, 0600, , TS, 14.8N, 74.6W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1200, , TS, 15.2N, 75.0W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1800, , TS, 15.5N, 75.3W, 40, 1002,
20251024, 0000, , TS, 15.7N, 75.6W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 0600, , TS, 16.0N, 75.3W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 1200, , TS, 15.8N, 74.9W, 45, 1000,
20251024, 1800, , TS, 15.8N, 74.5W, 50, 996,
20251025, 0000, , TS, 16.1N, 74.7W, 55, 993,
20251025, 0600, , TS, 16.3N, 74.9W, 60, 986,
20251025, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 75.1W, 65, 983,
20251025, 1800, , HU, 16.5N, 75.3W, 70, 977,
20251026, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 75.7W, 85, 970,
20251026, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 76.0W, 100, 957,
20251026, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 76.4W, 110, 952,
20251026, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 76.9W, 120, 944,
20251027, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 77.3W, 130, 932,
20251027, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 77.7W, 135, 922,
20251027, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 78.0W, 145, 913,
20251027, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 78.3W, 155, 906,
20251028, 0000, , HU, 16.5N, 78.6W, 155, 905,
20251028, 0600, , HU, 16.9N, 78.4W, 155, 900,
20251028, 1200, , HU, 17.5N, 78.1W, 165, 894,
20251028, 1400, I, HU, 17.9N, 78.0W, 170, 892,
20251028, 1700, L, HU, 18.1N, 78.0W, 160, 897,
20251028, 1800, , HU, 18.2N, 77.9W, 140, 910,
Much more will come as the rest of the lifespan unfolds, but the rationale for the peak intensity is a blend of the 179 kt FL winds (which translate to 161 kt at the surface) with limited observations (hence a higher intensity seems reasonable), the 172 kt dropsonde and the T8.0 Dvorak reading at the time, plus the continued pressure drop. The peak likely occurred at 1400Z. 175 kt was also considered using the dropsonde at face value, but I took a look back at the fixes to get to that.
Also, the 892 mb pressure is analyzed as the absolute low, based on the 893 mb about 30 minutes later, and slight filling before landfall due to the slight CDO warming.
Is there anything to make of the T8.5 estimate from not too long before?
0 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34275
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
Exalt wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:This is UNOFFICIAL, but here is how I would place the BT as of now.AL132025, MELISSA, xx,
20251020, 1200, , LO, 13.5N, 66.5W, 30, 1008,
20251020, 1800, , LO, 13.7N, 67.7W, 35, 1006,
20251021, 0000, , LO, 13.9N, 68.9W, 35, 1005,
20251021, 0600, , LO, 14.1N, 70.1W, 40, 1004,
20251021, 1200, , LO, 14.1N, 71.3W, 40, 1003,
20251021, 1800, , LO, 14.1N, 72.5W, 40, 1002,
20251022, 0000, , TS, 14.1N, 73.2W, 45, 1002,
20251022, 0600, , TS, 14.2N, 73.4W, 45, 1001,
20251022, 1200, , TS, 14.3N, 73.6W, 45, 1000,
20251022, 1800, , TS, 14.4N, 73.9W, 40, 1002,
20251023, 0000, , TS, 14.6N, 74.3W, 40, 1004,
20251023, 0600, , TS, 14.8N, 74.6W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1200, , TS, 15.2N, 75.0W, 35, 1005,
20251023, 1800, , TS, 15.5N, 75.3W, 40, 1002,
20251024, 0000, , TS, 15.7N, 75.6W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 0600, , TS, 16.0N, 75.3W, 40, 1001,
20251024, 1200, , TS, 15.8N, 74.9W, 45, 1000,
20251024, 1800, , TS, 15.8N, 74.5W, 50, 996,
20251025, 0000, , TS, 16.1N, 74.7W, 55, 993,
20251025, 0600, , TS, 16.3N, 74.9W, 60, 986,
20251025, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 75.1W, 65, 983,
20251025, 1800, , HU, 16.5N, 75.3W, 70, 977,
20251026, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 75.7W, 85, 970,
20251026, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 76.0W, 100, 957,
20251026, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 76.4W, 110, 952,
20251026, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 76.9W, 120, 944,
20251027, 0000, , HU, 16.4N, 77.3W, 130, 932,
20251027, 0600, , HU, 16.3N, 77.7W, 135, 922,
20251027, 1200, , HU, 16.4N, 78.0W, 145, 913,
20251027, 1800, , HU, 16.4N, 78.3W, 155, 906,
20251028, 0000, , HU, 16.5N, 78.6W, 155, 905,
20251028, 0600, , HU, 16.9N, 78.4W, 155, 900,
20251028, 1200, , HU, 17.5N, 78.1W, 165, 894,
20251028, 1400, I, HU, 17.9N, 78.0W, 170, 892,
20251028, 1700, L, HU, 18.1N, 78.0W, 160, 897,
20251028, 1800, , HU, 18.2N, 77.9W, 140, 910,
Much more will come as the rest of the lifespan unfolds, but the rationale for the peak intensity is a blend of the 179 kt FL winds (which translate to 161 kt at the surface) with limited observations (hence a higher intensity seems reasonable), the 172 kt dropsonde and the T8.0 Dvorak reading at the time, plus the continued pressure drop. The peak likely occurred at 1400Z. 175 kt was also considered using the dropsonde at face value, but I took a look back at the fixes to get to that.
Also, the 892 mb pressure is analyzed as the absolute low, based on the 893 mb about 30 minutes later, and slight filling before landfall due to the slight CDO warming.
Is there anything to make of the T8.5 estimate from not too long before?
That was the ADT which was running a little hot.
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
She looks a mess now on IR, hopefully good news for Cuba.
1 likes
-
IsabelaWeather
- Category 1

- Posts: 316
- Age: 36
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:29 am
- Location: Isabela, Puerto Rico
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
SteveM wrote:She looks a mess now on IR, hopefully good news for Cuba.
Not to me, the eye was always going to close up, the question is if the circulation got disrupted. If it didnt then the eye will open again quickly.
4 likes
- Ed_2001
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 245
- Age: 23
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:39 pm
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA>>Tampa, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMBPM0KYLgo
Montego Bay probably entered the inner eyewall around 30 minutes ago. Full on whiteout and winds looks well in excess of 100 mph.
To think, it's still this intense after already traversing 20+ miles of relatively mountainous land...
Montego Bay probably entered the inner eyewall around 30 minutes ago. Full on whiteout and winds looks well in excess of 100 mph.
To think, it's still this intense after already traversing 20+ miles of relatively mountainous land...
Last edited by Ed_2001 on Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
The answer my friend, is blowing in the wind...
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34275
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
IsabelaWeather wrote:SteveM wrote:She looks a mess now on IR, hopefully good news for Cuba.
Not to me, the eye was always going to close up, the question is if the circulation got disrupted. If it didnt then the eye will open again quickly.
When does Recon get back in after Jamaica? That will tell how much it weakened, and if the circulation got disrupted. If it is intact, then yes it could get going quickly, but if disrupted, it would likely be steady state to Cuba.
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
Ed_2001 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMBPM0KYLgo
Montego Bay probably entered the inner eyewall around 30 minutes ago. Full on whiteout and winds looks well in excess of 100 mph.
To think, it's still this intense after already traversing 20+ miles of relatively mountainous land...
Palm tree is flopping around like maybe 50 knots but that may be in a protected area.
When the center gets back out over the water the winds from the WNW may be heavier.
0 likes
- Ed_2001
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 245
- Age: 23
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:39 pm
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA>>Tampa, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
Nimbus wrote:
Palm tree is flopping around like maybe 50 knots but that may be in a protected area.
When the center gets back out over the water the winds from the WNW may be heavier.
There’s no way that’s only 50 knots winds with this degree of whiteout.
0 likes
The answer my friend, is blowing in the wind...
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
Ed_2001 wrote:Nimbus wrote:
Palm tree is flopping around like maybe 50 knots but that may be in a protected area.
When the center gets back out over the water the winds from the WNW may be heavier.
There’s no way that’s only 50 knots winds with this degree of whiteout.
38 with 58 at the airport now
28 05:00 E 38 G 54 0.00 Heavy Rain and Windy BKN010 OVC045 77 75.2 94% 78 0 0.0
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
Why is the 1932 Cuba Hurricane not on this list? Wiki article says it had 175 mph sustained winds and made multiple landfalls in Cuba and Bahamas.
The article also claims it is the latest in the season Cat 5, in November, and the longest duration at Cat 5.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1932_Cuba_hurricane
1 likes
- galaxy401
- Category 5

- Posts: 2443
- Age: 30
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
- Location: Casa Grande, Arizona
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
The worst damage from this storm appears to be the heavy flooding that's occurring in the mountains. That would create terrible landslides. They are no joke at all.
2 likes
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= Made Landfall at 185 mph / 892 mbs
mitchell wrote:
Why is the 1932 Cuba Hurricane not on this list? Wiki article says it had 175 mph sustained winds and made multiple landfalls in Cuba and Bahamas.
The article also claims it is the latest in the season Cat 5, in November, and the longest duration at Cat 5.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1932_Cuba_hurricane
IIRC, the 1932 Cuba Hurricane didn't actually make landfall at category 5 strength.
4 likes
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests






