kevin wrote:74 kt FL winds and 69 kt SFMR. Might be enough for an upgrade to 70 kt for the next advisory even though I would also understand keeping it at 65 kt.
Best track puts it at 70kts already.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
kevin wrote:74 kt FL winds and 69 kt SFMR. Might be enough for an upgrade to 70 kt for the next advisory even though I would also understand keeping it at 65 kt.
karenfromheaven wrote:Sanibel wrote:RI probably gulped-in some remnant dry air from Fiona...
This is a tough call on evacuation here on Sanibel because of the Charley factor...Plus I think this one might have surge unlike Charley, Wilma, and Irma...
The Bermuda High will make us or break us...
Have you studied the CERA website for surge? The bridge causeway off the island is underwater. You'll be cut off given the current NHC 13 track. That's without any Charlie-type deviations.
Iceresistance wrote:ElectricStorm wrote:SE eyewall stronger than last pass, also down to 981 and not at the center yet
The crazy pressure gradient is the part that bothers me the most.
https://s4.gifyu.com/images/recon_AF300-1409A-IAN_zoom.png
https://s4.gifyu.com/images/recon_AF300-1409A-IAN_zoom.png
CryHavoc wrote:Ugh, the evacuation page for the greater Tampa Area is down.
Not great timing to have a server outage.
wxman57 wrote:NHC track is in line with 12Z TVCN, and very close to my track. I do have lots of doubt about the track beyond Tuesday. It bugs me that some models have shifted the track farther offshore Wed/Thu. On the bright side, it would mean less severe impacts to the western Peninsula. It would also mean a weaker hurricane at landfall if it tracks any west of the current forecast, possibly only a TS at landfall. Would likely be hard hit by shear and dry air intrusion. We won't really be confident in where it will eventually go for another day or so.
chris_fit wrote:wxman57 wrote:NHC track is in line with 12Z TVCN, and very close to my track. I do have lots of doubt about the track beyond Tuesday. It bugs me that some models have shifted the track farther offshore Wed/Thu. On the bright side, it would mean less severe impacts to the western Peninsula. It would also mean a weaker hurricane at landfall if it tracks any west of the current forecast, possibly only a TS at landfall. Would likely be hard hit by shear and dry air intrusion. We won't really be confident in where it will eventually go for another day or so.
How's that jet thing looking that's supposed to push Ian more the E - You had talked about this int he days past. Anything new on that front?
KC7NEC wrote:CryHavoc wrote:Ugh, the evacuation page for the greater Tampa Area is down.
Not great timing to have a server outage.
A page that gets maybe 10 hits a day suddenly getting hundreds a minute will do that.
Weatherboy1 wrote:It sure seems based on satellite imagery that Ian is going to hit Isla de la Juventud directly, rather than miss it to the west and landfall in western Cuba. That would put it, what? 30 miles or so east of forecast points if so? Just wondering because that could have implications for eventual landfall in Florida
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests