At least they didn't use Wikipedia...

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Post Reply
Message
Author
RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

At least they didn't use Wikipedia...

#1 Postby RL3AO » Sat Sep 05, 2009 10:09 am

but The Onion isn't much better to use as a source.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8237558.stm



Then the original link to the Onion story.

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/conspiracy_theorist_convinces_neil
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
breeze
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9110
Age: 62
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:55 pm
Location: Lawrenceburg, TN

Re: At least they didn't use Wikipedia...

#2 Postby breeze » Sat Sep 05, 2009 3:23 pm

LOL, I cannot believe they didn't check their story first! Did it never occur to them that
no one else was buzzing about it?
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:
Contact senorpepr

#3 Postby senorpepr » Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:32 pm

Shoot... they'd be better off using Wikipedia. There's a better chance the information would be true through Wikipedia over the Onion.
0 likes   
Top
Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:
Contact Cryomaniac

Re:

#4 Postby Cryomaniac » Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:40 am

senorpepr wrote:Shoot... they'd be better off using Wikipedia. There's a better chance the information would be true through Wikipedia over the Onion.


Well exactly.
0 likes   
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests