STORM2K

I watched Entertainment TV Sunday night and was treated to 2 hours of the life history of Jenna Jameson. For all of you who don't know, she is the #1 stuff star in the business today, and has managed to accumulate a small fortune from having sex in front of the cameras. In fact...she is a marketing machine.

Anyway..to the point of my post. At the very end of the 2 hours, she dropped the bombshell that after her interview with Bill O'reilly on the Factor, he asked her to send him a few of her movies,

This might be old news..in fact I'm sure it is since O'reilly aired a piece in his "Most rediculous item of the day" segment the following day (which I missed), in which he didn't dispute the fact that he had indeed asked her for the movies. He played it off as rediculous, since he implied they were needed for professional purposes only, citing the fact that he couldn't be objective having never seen one of her movies. All in the spirit of "No Spin".

So....do you buy it? Or...do you think Bill just wanted what any red blooded male would want after sitting 3 feet away from arguably a very sexy, beautiful woman, totally uninhibited,....welll you get the point.

I don't see any "egg" yet....I have never seen any of Ms. Jameson's movies, either, so how can I judge them?

I'm not critisizing O'reilly....but...I think he put a little spin on this one. He's only human.

OK, maybe a little spin in the no-spin zone LOL

Bill O'Reilly got to meet and interview Jenna Jameson?? Darn it, knew I should have went to broadcasting school

Very interesting interview....she "held her own", so to speak against a usually in your face O'reilly. Like I said...the man was slightly intimidated I'd have to say. He indirectly called her a slut and a prostitute(which was as brave as he got), which I guess she took great offense to (stuff stars have pride too).

The funny thing about O'Reilly is the mis-conception that he is a Conservative..a label the Left likes to pin on him. The fact of the matter is the man is a self proclaimed Independant, with what I would call a Libertarian philosophy.

All that boils down to this: He believes that an American is entitled to certain liberties, such as smoking pot in one's home, and I guess viewing pornography in one's home (as examples), evidenced by his request for some sample movies.

As long as the activities in no way harm an innocent child, he doesn't have a problem with them.

I'd rather be caught with the movies than Hillary's book.

I can't judge yet, and may not be able to judge. It could be professional, but chances are a little personal too!