Page 1 of 1

At least they didn't use Wikipedia...

Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 10:09 am
by RL3AO
but The Onion isn't much better to use as a source.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8237558.stm



Then the original link to the Onion story.

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/conspiracy_theorist_convinces_neil

Re: At least they didn't use Wikipedia...

Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 3:23 pm
by breeze
LOL, I cannot believe they didn't check their story first! Did it never occur to them that
no one else was buzzing about it?

Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:32 pm
by senorpepr
Shoot... they'd be better off using Wikipedia. There's a better chance the information would be true through Wikipedia over the Onion.

Re:

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:40 am
by Cryomaniac
senorpepr wrote:Shoot... they'd be better off using Wikipedia. There's a better chance the information would be true through Wikipedia over the Onion.


Well exactly.