Page 1 of 2
That's it - enough w/ the Michael Jackson picture!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 11:21 pm
by Miss Mary
Every time you want to read news online, even locally, you have to see that picture of Michael Jackson just one more time - the one where he's looking like a deer caught in the headlights. Or a manequin. OMG, I want to cover him up. Like he covers the kids' faces.
Will we have to look at that photo for weeks to come now? OMG, I hope not.
Thanks - I'm done.
Is anyone else sickened by this photo? The whole story is sicko but now that picture is almost haunting me.
Mary
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 11:23 pm
by GalvestonDuck
LOL! I knew it would be a doozy!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 11:40 pm
by Stormsfury
NOTE TO SELF: Do NOT open threads that involve Michael Jackson and photos when getting ready to go to sleep for the night ...
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 2:15 am
by coriolis
Haunting is right. He's a ghost, or an alien, or a cartoon character, or I don't know what.
The blitz is on. Gritting teeth.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 7:37 am
by Danaus
Yes, PLEASE keep that frightful face off the TV!!!! I saw his drivers license photo this am and it was freaky!!! And to think, he was such an adorable little boy! He was still cute up until he had that first surgery, then ICK!! I'm glad his face was covered in the live pics.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 7:44 am
by azsnowman
I know...also, have you noticed it's the LEAD STORY on EVERY news channel?? What gives here?? He's a PERV with a BAD, BAD case of a screwed up plastic surgery! I for one cannot STAND this *person*......can't say if he's female, male!!
Dennis
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 7:59 am
by Miss Mary
And just what 15-20 years ago, he looked just fine? Wow, it's almost as if he's a completely different person than he was at the infamous Grammy's appearance in the mid 80s. Dare I say he looked normal then? Now he's just a freak.
I noticed this was THE lead story too, even locally. We only subscribe to the Sunday paper now and read news online mostly. I just didn't have the stomach to keep reading news yesterday. Couldn't stand that picture.
Mary
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 8:05 am
by j
I'm with you Mary...it pains me to look at that cross dressing boy molesting pervert
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 8:28 am
by TexasStooge
Just gives me nightmares looking at that Michael Jackson picture.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:13 am
by bfez1
I must say, his mug shot is better than Wynonna's. At least he was wearing makeup!
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:14 am
by wx247
He is one freakish looking (man?)!
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:39 am
by Lindaloo
Do you all notice the resemblance of he and Diana Ross? I believe that is the look he was after when he had all that plastic surgery.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:46 am
by Stephanie
Stormsfury wrote:NOTE TO SELF: Do NOT open threads that involve Michael Jackson and photos when getting ready to go to sleep for the night ...
LOL!!!Do you all notice the resemblance of he and Diana Ross? I believe that is the look he was after when he had all that plastic surgery.
Lindaloo - I said the same thing to Marty last night when we saw it on the news.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 10:03 am
by JCT777
If we never have to see or hear about him again, I would be fine with that.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 10:26 am
by Amanzi
My son saw a pic of him and said... Mommy whats wrong with that man's noses its all broke
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 11:06 am
by Lindaloo
Amanzi wrote:My son saw a pic of him and said... Mommy whats wrong with that man's noses its all broke
ROFLMBO!! Straight out the mouth of babes. I love it.
Steph... glad I am not the only one who noticed it. LOL. Whew.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 1:54 pm
by pawlee
kind of like Casey Kasem, he hasn't aged a bit!
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 2:05 pm
by TexasStooge
Lindaloo wrote:Amanzi wrote:My son saw a pic of him and said... Mommy whats wrong with that man's noses its all broke
ROFLMBO!! Straight out the mouth of babes. I love it.
LOL!!! I'd ask the same thing!!
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 3:55 pm
by Josephine96
I'm sick of looking at MJ's photos' period..
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:29 pm
by blizzard
He sure is a compelling argument for evolution.
.....or is that de-evolution