Page 1 of 1
Gallup poll shows Bush popularity dropping below 50%
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2003 8:44 pm
by cycloneye
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/02/ ... index.html
But still he beats the democrats 47% to 39% but the gap is more close than anytime in his presidency.
The economy is to blame for his drop in % and the Iraqi situation too.The biggest section of the poll that bush goes well down in % is when the question comes of the misseles.It drops to 33% the popularity if iraq destroys the misseles.
So guys there you have it and you can comment about it in favor or against.
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2003 10:04 pm
by wx247
Doesn't surprise me really. Not because of what Bush is doing, but because the country has moved more to the center as a whole and less of a mass of people on the left or right. And the economy going down the toilet is the worst thing that can happen to you during the presidency whether it is your fault or not.
Garrett

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 7:57 am
by cycloneye
Yes Garrett the key to the reelection of Bush will be not the Iraqi situation but the economy.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 6:02 pm
by JQ Public
Having a Bush deja vu...
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2003 8:51 pm
by Stephanie
Like the old saying..."It's the economy stupid!"
I'm not surprised at the lower approval ratings due to everything that has been going on. People are frustrated and frightened and they will take it out on the President and his Administration, whether he's to the best job that he can under the circumstances or not. This will happen no matter who's in charge.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 2:10 pm
by southerngale
Actually, it wasn't the usual approval ratings poll.
The percentage of voters who said they would support Bush for re-election dropped a little, but it's still a good bit more than supporters for Democrats.
I guess some of ya'll didn't read the story. Anyway, here it is.
Btw, the economy isn't as bad as the liberals want us to believe it is.
Support for Bush's re-election falls below 50 percent
President still enjoys advantage over Democrats
From Keating Holland
CNN Washington Bureau
Friday, February 28, 2003 Posted: 1:06 PM EST (1806 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The percentage of registered voters who say they would support President Bush in 2004 fell below 50 percent for the first time, according to a new CNN/USA TODAY/Gallup poll, which finds more Americans concerned about the economy.
Two-thirds of those who responded to the poll, released Thursday, describe current economic conditions as poor, a 10-point increase since December. Optimism about the future of the economy also dropped 10 points during that time.
Asked their choice for president, 47 percent of the registered voters polled said they would support Bush in 2004 -- compared with 51 percent in December. About 39 percent said they would support the Democratic candidate, compared with 37 percent in December.
Still, a majority of those polled, 57 percent, said they approved of the way Bush is handling the job of president. That Bush approval rating is the lowest since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
The poll -- based on telephone interviews with 1,004 adult Americans between February 24 and 26 -- also found that support for sending U.S. troops to Iraq remains steady at 59 percent. Public attitudes, however, are likely to be shaped by the events of the next week or so as indicated by the respondents' answers to other questions. Nearly half of all Americans say they may change their minds on Iraq; about a third said they are committed to war.
The poll comes as Bush continues to lobby the U.N. Security Council to pass another resolution declaring that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has missed his last chance to disarm. And the president has made several speeches in recent weeks, emphasizing his concern about the economy and his administration's determination to strengthen it.
The poll numbers suggest Bush has further to go in convincing Americans that he can turn the economy around. About 45 percent of those polled said they favor Bush's economic plan, while 40 percent said they oppose it, and 15 percent described themselves as unsure.
On Iraq, the support for invading that country seemed to hinge on several factors. One example: Forty percent of those polled said they would support an invasion of Iraq with U.S. forces only if the United Nations approves another U.S. resolution against Iraq. And support for an invasion drops significantly if Saddam destroys missiles cited by U.N. weapons inspectors, falling from 71 percent to 33 percent.
As for Saddam's recent challenge to Bush to join him in a debate, poll respondents left no doubt about who they thought would win. Three-quarters of respondents said Bush would win a debate.
The poll has a sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 2:15 pm
by Stephanie
"The economy isn't as bad as the liberals want us to believe"????
How's your 401k holding up? What about the gasoline prices have they stayed level for you? Are all of your friends and family employed? Made any expensive purchases lately or did you just pay down your debt with the $300 refund that you received last year like I did? How's your state's budget holding up? C'mon!
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 2:56 pm
by wx247
Missouri has lost more jobs than any other state in the US. Some 100,000+ in the last year. Luckily for us, that has been mainly in KC and St. Louis, but unfortunate for them.
I think the low number for the Dem. side is because there is no clear Dem. running for the office. These numbers don't mean much until the primaries are over, but the fact that Bush is below 50% and we know he IS running, speaks volumes.
Garrett

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 4:29 pm
by Rainband
I think given the circumstances he is dealing with, Bush is doing a great job. I also think the economy has seen better days but alot of that isn't his fault. Prices on everything seem to have gone up a little here and there. The reason for higher food prices is because of the drought and freeze etc. People were also less apt to spend during the last year due to the uncertainty but I say if anybody thinks Bush is doing such a bad job consider who the alternate was :o :o :o
Johnathan
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 4:45 pm
by wx247
I can't disagree with that Rainband!
And I know that the economy is not completely the President's fault, but where the fault is found is when a Prez. says that he will do something that will turn the economy back around, ie. tax cuts, and it doesn't help. I am not here to debate whether or not he should have cut taxes, but when people in high positions like that make bold statements, we expect results.
The prez. doesn't control the economy...but his job is controlled by the public. Watch in 2004...if the economy isn't much better...a lot of executives, Dems and/or Repubs will be in trouble.

Garrett

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 8:05 pm
by southerngale
I didn't say that the economy was soaring or even good. I just said that it's not as bad as the liberals want us to believe. You don't hear anything that's good about it, like plummeting interest rates and sky-rocketing home sales and values.
Our household runs about the same now as it did a few years ago, with the exception of the brand new minivan and 2nd hand pickup we bought last year. We only paid cash for one of them. (I'll let you guess which one

) Our 401k is staying steady but we won't need it for another 30 years or so and I'm not worried. In case it has escaped anyone's notice,
WE ARE AT WAR!!! If I have to pay a little more for a few things to keep from being blown up while I do it, I will gladly hand over the extra cash. I am not rich. I'm middle-class, and probably lower-end middle class. I'm also not extravagant. We save for the things we want.
I'm certainly no economist. In fact, I don't know as much as I should about how all of this works. But I've got enough sense not to give credit or blame to the President of the United States for every dime and dollar that comes in and out of my pocket.
Surely some of Bush's plans to restore the recessive economy that he inherited when he took office were put on the back burner after 9/11. It had to be that way. If he manages to fight and win the war against terror (did you hear about arrests yesterday?)
AND inspire an economic recovery, he will be one of the greatest presidents ever! That is one
FULL PLATE!
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 8:14 pm
by wx247
I think you make some good points, but Bush as one of the greatest presidents of all time? Hardly!
Garrett

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 8:20 pm
by chadtm80
I didn't say that the economy was soaring or even good. I just said that it's not as bad as the liberals want us to believe. You don't hear anything that's good about it, like plummeting interest rates and sky-rocketing home sales and values.
Our household runs about the same now as it did a few years ago, with the exception of the brand new minivan and 2nd hand pickup we bought last year. We only paid cash for one of them. (I'll let you guess which one ) Our 401k is staying steady but we won't need it for another 30 years or so and I'm not worried. In case it has escaped anyone's notice, WE ARE AT WAR!!! If I have to pay a little more for a few things to keep from being blown up while I do it, I will gladly hand over the extra cash. I am not rich. I'm middle-class, and probably lower-end middle class. I'm also not extravagant. We save for the things we want.
I'm certainly no economist. In fact, I don't know as much as I should about how all of this works. But I've got enough sense not to give credit or blame to the President of the United States for every dime and dollar that comes in and out of my pocket.
Surely some of Bush's plans to restore the recessive economy that he inherited when he took office were put on the back burner after 9/11. It had to be that way. If he manages to fight and win the war against terror (did you hear about arrests yesterday?) AND inspire an economic recovery, he will be one of the greatest presidents ever! That is one FULL PLATE
Great post southerngale.. He indeed does have a full plate... and i for one think he is handling it very well...
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 8:20 pm
by JQ Public
Stephanie wrote:"The economy isn't as bad as the liberals want us to believe"????
How's your 401k holding up? What about the gasoline prices have they stayed level for you? Are all of your friends and family employed? Made any expensive purchases lately or did you just pay down your debt with the $300 refund that you received last year like I did? How's your state's budget holding up? C'mon!
401k...i'm only in college. Gas...up 40-60 cents since last year. Employed...nope uncle's been outta job for a while. Expensive purchases...nope. State Budget...we're have a very bad budget crisis in NC. hmmmmmmmmmm
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 8:38 pm
by Stephanie
Bush did not "inherit" a recession. He inherited a bullish market that was running out of gas as had been foretold and warned about for years before. Because of the bullish market, our economy was bullish too.
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2003 9:33 pm
by mf_dolphin
Our stock markets were artifically high to begin with. The events of 9-11 and the corruption of corporate giants such as Enron sealed the fate of the stock market for the short term. The unrest over the situation in Iraq and the added pressure of the Venezuela situation have driven up the price of oil. The basic US economy is in good shape and a return to a bull market will happen as soon as things settle down.