Page 1 of 1
Hans Blix hiding more "bad news"...
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 6:51 am
by streetsoldier
This morning on FoxNews (WELCOME BACK, E.D. HILL!
), it was discovered that another piece. or pieces of ordnance was buried on p. 163 of the 178 page report...this one is a new type of missile with multiple warheads, each containing bio/chem payloads.
This revelation cast doubt on the UN's credibility, not to mention confidence in Dr. Blix himself.
(
...I just now noticed that I have passed into the coveted atmosphere of "Guru"! Do I get a new, different-color paper hat?)
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 6:56 am
by cycloneye
In my opinion Mr Blix has no credibilitie because of his latest reports that has not been strong for the US side.
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:32 am
by j
streetsoldier....Fox and Friends hasn't been the same w/o E.D. To me she is the best woman in the business and Fox is lucky to have her. Now...if she could just do something about that laugh..
I think Hans is about as relevant as the United Nations is about to become
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:44 am
by Derek Ortt
This proves that the UN should be exiled from the USA. Our security is a stake, thanks to this spy, Hans Blix. He is clearly working for the French alliance now, as he is no longer impartial in his reports to the Council, but instead is hiding everything. I am somewhat surprised that he didn't simply delete these from his reports
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 9:12 am
by firefighter16
I think we better wake up and quite reling on this individual. He, Blix, deffinetly seems to have an agenda of his own.
we are the ones that took this to the un
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 9:48 am
by rainstorm
dick cheney was right. the inspections would accomplish nothing, just a device to do nothing
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 9:57 am
by Stephanie
The inspections would've accomplished something if all of the cards were put on the table so to speak - good and bad. Blix's credibility is definately in question now. If he handled this better (or correctly) then we would've probably been at war right now. Unfortunately another good, fair concept gets screwed up due to politics and greed.
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 10:56 am
by mf_dolphin
The only hope for inspections to succeed would have been if Saddam wanted to cooperate. We knew as soon as the documentation was turned over that he had no intent of doing that. I'll say again, France, Germany and Russia's only interest in not forceably disarming is to preserve their good customer. The HELL WITH THEM!!!
LETS'S ROLL!!!!!!!!
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 11:01 am
by vbhoutex
Can we once again say all together now-
HANS BLIX IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE USELESS!!!!!
That has been so OBVIOUS since day one. I can't believe we have allowed this CRAP to go on for so long!!
we have no one to blame but ourselves
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 1:33 pm
by rainstorm
vbhoutex wrote:Can we once again say all together now-
HANS BLIX IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE USELESS!!!!!
That has been so OBVIOUS since day one. I can't believe we have allowed this CRAP to go on for so long!!
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 3:38 pm
by sunny shine
How do we have ourselves to blame rainstorm?
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 3:44 pm
by Rainband
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 3:51 pm
by mf_dolphin
sunny shine wrote:How do we have ourselves to blame rainstorm?
I have to agree with Sunny Shine's question Rainband. I don't understand how we are to blame for Blix's performance. I should have said lack of performance! :o
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 3:55 pm
by Rainband
Rainband??? did you mean rainstorm????? I didn't agree with the statement either :? :? :? read my reply I was refering to rainstorms comment not sunnyshines:)
Johnathan
we have ourselves to blame, because
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 5:36 pm
by rainstorm
sunny shine wrote:How do we have ourselves to blame rainstorm?
over the objections of rumsfield and dick cheney, bush gave powell the go ahead to run to the un. looking at todays developments, we can see what that got us
Re: we have ourselves to blame, because
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2003 1:04 am
by sunny shine
rainstorm wrote:sunny shine wrote:How do we have ourselves to blame rainstorm?
over the objections of rumsfield and dick cheney, bush gave powell the go ahead to run to the un. looking at todays developments, we can see what that got us
Well what way did you want us to go rainstorm? We can always say we tried. There is more to France than meets the eye. I believe they are in business with Saddam and when we go in and take over, we will find that out. Believe half of what you hear and ALL of what you see.
