Page 1 of 1
J. Jackson poses topless!
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 5:33 pm
by sunnyday
This woman is an exhibitionist and too old to be showing, no matter what plastic surgery can do for an almost 40 year old body. She is posing topless for her new cd that comes out in March.
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 5:53 pm
by azsnowman
Some how doesn't suprize me, who's next in that WACKO family, Tito shows some (edit)
Dennis
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 6:02 pm
by Lindaloo
LOL Dennis.
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 6:10 pm
by David
Lol,,, heard that on Jay Leno last night.
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:35 pm
by GalvestonDuck
She did it years ago on the cover of Rolling Stone. Of course, she had Lenny Kravitz's hands over her (I think it was him), so it wasn't truly "topless" and yet it was.
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:42 pm
by blizzard
I just don't see why this is making such headlines. I mean she posed topless at the superbowl too...
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:48 pm
by streetsoldier
Frankly, I don't give a tit.
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:49 pm
by blizzard
streetsoldier wrote:Frankly, I don't give a tit.
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 8:10 pm
by Stephanie
streetsoldier wrote:Frankly, I don't give a tit.
Good one Bill!
Yeah, I'm sure that she was REALLY SORRY!
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:17 pm
by Miss Mary
streetsoldier wrote:Frankly, I don't give a tit.
Bill!!! This post is right up there with Ed's way back when on TWC boards.....remember his? Well anyway, yours made me almost choke on my tea!!!! LOL
Mary
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:27 pm
by timNms
The Superbowl was free advertisement for her new cd??? LOL
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:33 pm
by Pburgh
Bill, ROTFLMAO. I'm glad she doesn't go bottomless cause I think we would be shocked at her big set of balls. OOPS Did I really say that???? Sorry
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:33 pm
by blizzard
timNms wrote:The Superbowl was free advertisement for her new cd??? LOL
That, and she probably is hoping to get a spread in Playboy, which will probably happen. They seem to go for the scandalous. Remember Jenna and Heidi from the survivor show, they bared themselves on the show and Playboy gave them some exposure also.
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:34 am
by streetsoldier
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 7:52 am
by coriolis
streetsoldier wrote:Frankly, I don't give a tit.
No, but she does.
So is she disqualified as a "character" witness at her brother's trial?
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 8:57 am
by streetsoldier
From what I have heard, the Nation of Islam won't let MJ's family anywhere mear him...if Janet does attend the court proceedings, it will only be to keep "a-breast "of the situation.
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:10 am
by coriolis
Ouch.
That's weird. Under Islamic law, wouldn't MJ be up for a good old fashioned stoning for what he (is alleged) to have done?
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:30 am
by furluvcats
Bill, you've got me rolling!
She's just trying to revive and long gone career, and this PR is better than no PR in her book I'm sure...when was the last time she stole the spotlight from her brother Michael, can you remember?
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:01 pm
by TexasStooge
No surprise.
