Page 1 of 1
Kerry Will Abandon War on Terrorism
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 7:31 pm
by chadtm80
The Democratic Party's presidential front-runner, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), has pledged that if elected he will abandon the president's war on terror, begin a dialogue with terrorist regimes and apologize for three-and-one-half years of mistakes by the Bush administration
http://www.insightmag.com/news/2004/03/ ... 1288.shtml
If you want to keep your families and your country safe.. DONT vote Kerry
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 7:37 pm
by stormraiser
This guys toast
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 8:32 pm
by ColdFront77
The only good thing about Kerry winning all the primaries and caucasus he has one so far, is that he is from Massachusetts.
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 8:34 pm
by mf_dolphin
stormraiser wrote:This guys toast
and I'm going to do everything I can do to help light the fire
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:07 pm
by Lindaloo
What a bold statement for him to make. But then again, this is John Kerry.
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:09 pm
by mf_dolphin
I would say stupid but bold will be ok for now
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:11 pm
by stormchazer
He is too stupid...or worse...too dangerous to be President.
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 12:30 am
by southerngale
Way too dangerous to be President. I still haven't figured out how he got the nomination. Lack of decent Democrats wanting to run?
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 7:23 am
by mf_dolphin
I still think he's the sacrifical lamb si that Hillary can run in 2008. Hillary didn't want to run against President Bush so they're running Kerry and expect him to lose. That will clear the way for Hillary in 2008
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 8:38 am
by j
southerngale wrote:Way too dangerous to be President. I still haven't figured out how he got the nomination. Lack of decent Democrats wanting to run?
I think they are clamoring for a Liberal extremist.
THEY have definitely forgotten. Ever wonder what Kerry's view on terrorism and HOW to fight it might differ had his wife or children been incinerated on 911?
I wonder if their would be ANY limit to the funding he would request from Congress to do WHATEVER it takes?
I think we all know, including you Liberals, the answers to these questions.
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:19 am
by streetsoldier
"Apologize"???? I have to defer to Bugs Bunny on this lunacy...
"Eeeennnhhh...What a maroon!"
And, that there are people in our Republic who "buy" this twaddle...
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 2:00 am
by Corona
Frankly, my view is that GW will be re-elected due to several points: you just don't change horses mid-stream while we're fighting so many priority battles and while we're trying to keep the terror guys away in the short term. Bush is experienced in foreign policy, Kerry is not nearly as skilled, and right now we need a strong leader. This is not the time to test drive a "first production year" car. If so and he's got leaky valves, we'd have to either trade it in or invest in many other 'fixes' like additional personnel to help smoothe out decisions that one guy, our main guy, can do now. Maintenance costs are pretty steep on P-Year 1 cars, er, horses.