STORM2K

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServe ... 2571727088

OMG NK wants Kerry to be president because he will be more willing to negociate the nukes situation and to help them rebuild as a nation.NO WAY.

it still looks to me kerry will win.

Oh helen if Kerry wins North Korea will be a BIG BIG problem for the US more than Iraq because they want consessions that Bush hasn't caved into and to me it is very dangerous to negociate with KIM JON ILL.

it still looks to me kerry will win.

It still looks to me like you just like dropping in your one line political nothings to stir up trouble.. Kind of troll like

Rain storm is not a troll lol

I also think Kerry will win.. I'm going to vote for him in Tuesday's primary and I'll vote for him in November too

the bush team is inept. sorry, but if the unemployment number doesnt improve, its over.
and the ads for bush are pathetic. i dont mean to say there is anything wrong with using 9/11 images, i am saying they were tripe. bush needs, starting now, to attack kerry.

Tell me this. If John Kerry wins the election, isn't the Congress still made up of Republicans for the most part? And don't these same Republicans have the right to veto requests that the President makes?

Unless I'm mistaken, the President can't do whatever he wants without approval from Congress.

Ok guys this thread is about North Korea and their desire to deal with Kerry as the future US president not sidebar issues so let's stick to the theme.

janswizard wrote:Tell me this. If John Kerry wins the election, isn't the Congress still made up of Republicans for the most part? And don't these same Republicans have the right to veto requests that the President makes?

Unless I'm mistaken, the President can't do whatever he wants without approval from Congress.

As it stands now the Republicans hold the majority but do not have sufficient votes to overturn a Presidentil veto.

not only north korea wants kerry, every terrorist wants him. as far as a republican congress, if kerry wins by 5 or more %, that will be history

janswizard wrote:Tell me this. If John Kerry wins the election, isn't the Congress still made up of Republicans for the most part? And don't these same Republicans have the right to veto requests that the President makes?

Unless I'm mistaken, the President can't do whatever he wants without approval from Congress.

Actually during most presidential terms the congress is usually the opposite of the party of the President. This is one of the few terms where it has not happened.

As for the NK thing. I wouldn't be surprised they would pick anyone that goes against bush i believe. Most of those countries just don't want bush.

JQ Public wrote:
As for the NK thing. I wouldn't be surprised they would pick anyone that goes against bush i believe. Most of those countries just don't want bush.

Agreed! They know he means business!!

That is why Kim Jon ILL wants Kerry to be president because he wants to negociate but Bush has standed very firm not to do so.

is that if Bush loses, which I also think he might (I'm certainly not going to vote for him-nor Kerry or Nader, probably Libertarian like last time-you see I don't like Bush at all after the hatchet job he did on McCain), then the Republicans could lose their razor thin majorities in the House and Senate and thanks to the turncoat iin the Senate they only have to gain two seats there to get a slim majority. My thought is that Bush will lose and the Republicans will lose their majority in the House and Senate but not by much which will put them in position for the mid term election which will probably result in enough Democrat losses to give the Republicans the Legislative Branch back. As bad as the prospects of a Kerry Presidency are, and they are bad, there's one bright spot-if Kerry wins, ATTILA THE HEN (HILLARY) WILL NEVER BECOME PRESIDENT and the prospect of her as President would be a fate worse than death for this Country.

Steve