Page 1 of 1

This comes as NO surprise

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:00 am
by azsnowman
Should we be surprised about this? :roll:


Michael Jackson faces another abuse allegation
advertisement

Tim Molloy
Associated Press
Apr. 14, 2004 12:00 AM


LOS ANGELES - Detectives are investigating a new allegation of child abuse against pop star Michael Jackson involving a person who claims to have been victimized in the late 1980s, a police spokeswoman said Tuesday.

Jackson has pleaded innocent to child molestation charges involving another victim in Santa Barbara County. Jackson attorney Benjamin Brafman said he was unaware of the investigation.

"We have never been informed by the LAPD of any investigation that they are conducting of Michael Jackson," he said. "I would point out that since I have been involved in this case I have addressed literally dozens of completely baseless rumors on a daily basis, and this appears to be just another one of them."

The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office asked the LAPD to investigate the new allegation a month ago, said Mary Grady, commander of the department's public information office.

"The victim alleges the acts took place in the city of Los Angeles in the late 1980s," she said.

The allegations are being investigated by the Child Protective Section of the department's Juvenile Division. Grady declined to elaborate on such details as the age or sex of the victim.

Los Angeles district attorney's spokeswoman Sandi Gibbons declined comment.

"This is a matter under investigation by the LAPD," she said. "We are not the investigative agency."

Santa Barbara County prosecutors did not immediately return calls for comment Tuesday evening.

Steve Cron, a defense attorney who has represented clients accused of molestation, said the new suspected abuse would be within the statute of limitations if it occurred after 1988. He said the accuser could also help prosecutors in the Santa Barbara case show a pattern of abuse, though the amount of time since the alleged acts could hurt the accuser's credibility.

"The questions are asked: Why didn't this allegation surface earlier? Why didn't he report it to someone a long time ago? How accurate is his recollection? How accurate is his ability to relay the events to someone else?" Cron said.

Also Tuesday, an appeals court rejected a request by several news agencies to lift a gag order placed on the parties by the judge in the Santa Barbara case.


Dennis :roll:

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:07 am
by stormraiser
:eek: Surprised, no. Even if he didn't do it, his bizarre behaviour only invites more allegations

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 1:15 pm
by bfez1
Im shocked!!! NOT!!!

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2004 1:17 pm
by wx247
stormraiser wrote::eek: Surprised, no. Even if he didn't do it, his bizarre behaviour only invites more allegations


Exactly. Anyone who acts like Michael does and defends himself as pitifully as he does is guilty of something... if only it is dillusionality.